H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC

Lindsay Davenport vs Pam Shriver H2H: 1-0

Lindsay Davenport holds a 1–0 lead over Pam Shriver in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Lindsay Davenport leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Lindsay Davenport won the 1994 US Open second round 6-1 6-2.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Lindsay Davenport
USA Age 50 Right-Handed 189 cm / 6'2"
H2H
1 – 0
1 main draw meetings
Pam Shriver
USA Age 64 Right-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Sep 1, 1994* US Open Grand Slam R64 Hard Lindsay Davenport #7 6-1 6-2 Pam Shriver #52 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Lindsay Davenport #35 #1 6,100 2,353 704 190 78.7% 3 13 1 25 12 54
Pam Shriver #234 #3 163 2,302 624 277 69.3% 0 0 0 4 20 24

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Lindsay Davenport Pam Shriver
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 1991 1–2 33.3% #348 1,504 0 0 1978 23–8 74.2% — 1,849 0 1
16 1992 2–5 28.6% #161 1,511 0 0 1979 16–16 50.0% — 1,798 0 1
17 1993 31–15 67.4% #20 1,858 0 1 1980 47–21 69.1% — 2,027 0 2
18 1994 44–15 74.6% #6 2,022 0 3 1981 58–25 69.9% — 2,122 0 4
19 1995 31–14 68.9% #12 1,933 0 4 1982 47–19 71.2% — 2,087 0 5
20 1996 41–15 73.2% #9 2,013 0 6 1983 52–15 77.6% — 2,161 0 8
21 1997 57–16 78.1% #3 2,161 0 12 1984 44–13 77.2% #4 2,060 0 10
22 1998 68–14 82.9% #1 2,283 1 18 1985 54–13 80.6% #4 2,117 0 14
23 1999 58–11 84.1% #2 2,297 2 25 1986 47–15 75.8% #5 2,194 0 16
24 2000 56–13 81.2% #2 2,228 3 29 1987 60–13 82.2% #4 2,254 0 20
25 2001 64–10 86.5% #1 2,275 3 36 1988 58–14 80.6% #5 2,188 0 24
26 2002 24–9 72.7% #12 2,153 3 36 1989 24–14 63.2% #18 1,955 0 24
27 2003 48–15 76.2% #5 2,076 3 37 1990 8–5 61.5% #66 1,911 0 24
28 2004 64–10 86.5% #1 2,203 3 44 1991 21–18 53.8% #37 1,822 0 24
29 2005 58–11 84.1% #1 2,199 3 50 1992 25–18 58.1% #30 1,858 0 24
30 2006 21–8 72.4% #25 2,122 3 50 1993 14–13 51.9% #38 1,819 0 24
31 2007 13–1 92.9% #72 2,147 3 52 1994 13–16 44.8% #63 1,699 0 24
32 2008 23–6 79.3% #35 2,063 3 54 1995 7–11 38.9% #110 1,649 0 24
33 — — — — — — — 1996 4–9 30.8% #189 1,611 0 24
34 — — — — — — — 1997 2–1 66.7% #234 1,635 0 24