H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 17:48 UTC
Lisa Bonder Kreiss vs Pam Casale H2H: 4-1
Lisa Bonder Kreiss holds a 4–1 lead over Pam Casale in their WTA head-to-head. Across 5 main-draw meetings, Lisa Bonder Kreiss leads 2–0 on clay and 2–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Lisa Bonder Kreiss won the 1988 Boca Raton second round 6-4 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 9, 1988* | Boca Raton | WTA 250 | R64 | Hard | Lisa Bonder Kreiss | 6-4 6-3 | Pam Casale | Match data |
| Sep 4, 1987* | US Open | Grand Slam | R64 | Hard | Lisa Bonder Kreiss | 6-4 6-1 | Pam Casale | Match data |
| Aug 9, 1984* | Indianapolis | WTA 250 | SF | Clay | Lisa Bonder Kreiss | 7-5 7-6 | Pam Casale | Match data |
| May 26, 1983* | Roland Garros | Grand Slam | R64 | Clay | Lisa Bonder Kreiss | 6-4 6-3 | Pam Casale | Match data |
| Dec 9, 1982* | Richmond | WTA 250 | R32 | Carpet | Pam Casale | 7-6 6-1 | Lisa Bonder Kreiss | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lisa Bonder Kreiss | — | — | — | 1,928 | 148 | 131 | 53.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 5 |
| Pam Casale | #671 | #14 | 22 | 1,944 | 168 | 147 | 53.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Lisa Bonder Kreiss | Pam Casale | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 1981 | 9–6 | 60.0% | — | 1,603 | 0 | 1 | 1980 | 15–10 | 60.0% | — | 1,597 | 0 | 0 |
| 1982 | 28–15 | 65.1% | — | 1,769 | 0 | 3 | 1981 | 30–17 | 63.8% | — | 1,811 | 0 | 0 |
| 1983 | 26–19 | 57.8% | — | 1,885 | 0 | 5 | 1982 | 20–23 | 46.5% | — | 1,746 | 0 | 0 |
| 1984 | 31–19 | 62.0% | — | 1,865 | 0 | 5 | 1983 | 23–20 | 53.5% | — | 1,769 | 0 | 0 |
| 1985 | 17–22 | 43.6% | — | 1,796 | 0 | 5 | 1984 | 31–17 | 64.6% | #15 | 1,914 | 0 | 0 |
| 1986 | 12–13 | 48.0% | — | 1,734 | 0 | 5 | 1985 | 24–20 | 54.5% | #14 | 1,814 | 0 | 0 |
| 1987 | 12–14 | 46.2% | — | 1,703 | 0 | 5 | 1986 | 16–17 | 48.5% | #41 | 1,787 | 0 | 0 |
| 1988 | 6–14 | 30.0% | — | 1,634 | 0 | 5 | 1987 | 5–11 | 31.2% | #111 | 1,654 | 0 | 0 |
| 1989 | 1–2 | 33.3% | — | 1,625 | 0 | 5 | 1988 | 4–10 | 28.6% | #169 | 1,542 | 0 | 0 |
| 1990 | 1–2 | 33.3% | — | 1,620 | 0 | 5 | 1989 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #225 | 1,537 | 0 | 0 |
| 1991 | 5–5 | 50.0% | — | 1,637 | 0 | 5 | 1990 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #554 | 1,516 | 0 | 0 |