H2H data updated: 2026-10-28 00:00 UTC
Lisa Bonder Kreiss holds a 4–1 lead over Pam Casale in their WTA head-to-head. Across 5 main-draw meetings, Lisa Bonder Kreiss leads 2–0 on clay and 2–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Lisa Bonder Kreiss won the 1988 Boca Raton round of 64 6-4 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
| Player | Score | Player | Match Data | Date | Round | Tournament | Category | Surface |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lisa Bonder Kreiss | 6-4 6-3 | Pam Casale | Match data | Mar 9, 1988* | R64 | Boca Raton | WTA 500 | Hard |
| Lisa Bonder Kreiss | 6-4 6-1 | Pam Casale | Match data | Sep 4, 1987* | R64 | US Open | Grand Slam | Hard |
| Lisa Bonder Kreiss | 7-5 7-6 | Pam Casale | Match data | Aug 9, 1984* | SF | Indianapolis | WTA 500 | Clay |
| Lisa Bonder Kreiss | 6-4 6-3 | Pam Casale | Match data | May 26, 1983* | R64 | Roland Garros | Grand Slam | Clay |
| Pam Casale | 7-6 6-1 | Lisa Bonder Kreiss | Match data | Dec 9, 1982* | R32 | Richmond | WTA 250 | Carpet |
Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories | Finals | 500 including documented historical predecessor categories | 250 including documented historical predecessor categories | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lisa Bonder Kreiss | — | — | — | 1,928 | 148 | 131 | 53.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 5 |
| Pam Casale | — | #14 | 22 | 1,944 | 168 | 147 | 53.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Lisa Bonder Kreiss | Pam Casale | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 1981 | 9–6 | 60.0% | — | 1,603 | 0 | 1 | 1980 | 15–10 | 60.0% | — | 1,597 | 0 | 0 |
| 1982 | 28–15 | 65.1% | — | 1,768 | 0 | 3 | 1981 | 30–17 | 63.8% | — | 1,811 | 0 | 0 |
| 1983 | 26–19 | 57.8% | — | 1,885 | 0 | 5 | 1982 | 20–23 | 46.5% | — | 1,746 | 0 | 0 |
| 1984 | 31–19 | 62.0% | — | 1,865 | 0 | 5 | 1983 | 23–20 | 53.5% | — | 1,770 | 0 | 0 |
| 1985 | 17–22 | 43.6% | — | 1,797 | 0 | 5 | 1984 | 31–17 | 64.6% | #15 | 1,914 | 0 | 0 |
| 1986 | 12–13 | 48.0% | — | 1,733 | 0 | 5 | 1985 | 24–20 | 54.5% | — | 1,815 | 0 | 0 |
| 1987 | 12–14 | 46.2% | — | 1,703 | 0 | 5 | 1986 | 16–17 | 48.5% | #41 | 1,788 | 0 | 0 |
| 1988 | 6–14 | 30.0% | — | 1,634 | 0 | 5 | 1987 | 5–11 | 31.2% | #111 | 1,673 | 0 | 0 |
| 1989 | 1–2 | 33.3% | — | 1,626 | 0 | 5 | 1988 | 4–10 | 28.6% | #169 | 1,552 | 0 | 0 |
| 1990 | 1–2 | 33.3% | — | 1,621 | 0 | 5 | 1989 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #225 | 1,547 | 0 | 0 |
| 1991 | 5–5 | 50.0% | — | 1,638 | 0 | 5 | 1990 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,526 | 0 | 0 |
Rows are aligned in career order because complete birth data is unavailable. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.
| Lisa Bonder Kreiss | Pam Casale | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | Carpet | Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | Carpet | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | ||
| 1981 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | 1980 | 8 | 7 | 15 | 53.3% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1982 | 9 | 3 | 12 | 75.0% | 19 | 7 | 26 | 73.1% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | 0 | 3 | 3 | 0.0% | 1981 | 17 | 6 | 23 | 73.9% | 7 | 5 | 12 | 58.3% | 4 | 3 | 7 | 57.1% | 2 | 3 | 5 | 40.0% |
| 1983 | 8 | 2 | 10 | 80.0% | 7 | 10 | 17 | 41.2% | 3 | 2 | 5 | 60.0% | 8 | 5 | 13 | 61.5% | 1982 | 2 | 4 | 6 | 33.3% | 10 | 7 | 17 | 58.8% | 2 | 2 | 4 | 50.0% | 6 | 10 | 16 | 37.5% |
| 1984 | 7 | 3 | 10 | 70.0% | 15 | 6 | 21 | 71.4% | 2 | 2 | 4 | 50.0% | 7 | 8 | 15 | 46.7% | 1983 | 5 | 5 | 10 | 50.0% | 13 | 8 | 21 | 61.9% | 3 | 3 | 6 | 50.0% | 2 | 4 | 6 | 33.3% |
| 1985 | 6 | 6 | 12 | 50.0% | 4 | 5 | 9 | 44.4% | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% | 6 | 8 | 14 | 42.9% | 1984 | 8 | 3 | 11 | 72.7% | 8 | 5 | 13 | 61.5% | 4 | 3 | 7 | 57.1% | 11 | 6 | 17 | 64.7% |
| 1986 | 5 | 5 | 10 | 50.0% | 5 | 4 | 9 | 55.6% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% | 1985 | 17 | 7 | 24 | 70.8% | 4 | 5 | 9 | 44.4% | 0 | 3 | 3 | 0.0% | 3 | 5 | 8 | 37.5% |
| 1987 | 8 | 5 | 13 | 61.5% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | 2 | 5 | 7 | 28.6% | 1986 | 3 | 6 | 9 | 33.3% | 11 | 5 | 16 | 68.8% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | 1 | 5 | 6 | 16.7% |
| 1988 | 5 | 10 | 15 | 33.3% | 0 | 3 | 3 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | 1987 | 3 | 5 | 8 | 37.5% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% |
| 1989 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1988 | 3 | 6 | 9 | 33.3% | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — |
| 1990 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1989 | — | — | — | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1991 | 5 | 4 | 9 | 55.6% | — | — | — | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | 1990 | — | — | — | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Career | 55 | 44 | 99 | 55.6% | 51 | 37 | 88 | 58.0% | 8 | 13 | 21 | 38.1% | 26 | 35 | 61 | 42.6% | Career | 66 | 49 | 115 | 57.4% | 55 | 41 | 96 | 57.3% | 15 | 19 | 34 | 44.1% | 25 | 35 | 60 | 41.7% |
Rows are aligned in career order because complete birth data is unavailable. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.
| Lisa Bonder Kreiss | Pam Casale | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule |
| 1981 | 1604 | 125.7 | — | — | — | — | -15 | — | — | 58.1% | +0.77 | 1–2 (33%) | 3–1 (75%) | 101.3 | +0.04 | 1980 | 1598 | 118.8 | — | — | — | — | +31 | — | — | 57.4% | +0.72 | 3–3 (50%) | 1–1 | — | +2.08 |
| 1982 | 1768 | 139.6 | — | — | — | — | -113 | +67 | — | 61.1% | +0.97 | 9–2 (82%) | 3–4 (43%) | 108.6 | -1.35 | 1981 | 1811 | 140.6 | — | — | — | — | -1 | -153 | -195 | 64.1% | +1.03 | 3–6 (33%) | 6–0 (100%) | 101.9 | +2.45 |
| 1983 | 1885 | 141.9 | — | — | — | — | +6 | -142 | -283 | 55.0% | +0.38 | 7–6 (54%) | 5–2 (71%) | 104.1 | +1.97 | 1982 | 1746 | 140.5 | — | — | — | — | -55 | -5 | -107 | 50.5% | +0.01 | 1–8 (11%) | 9–5 (64%) | 95.6 | -2.94 |
| 1984 | 1866 | 149.1 | — | — | — | — | -23 | +31 | -236 | 60.9% | +0.95 | 7–8 (47%) | 3–6 (33%) | 96.1 | +1.43 | 1983 | 1771 | 144.3 | — | — | — | — | -54 | +93 | -103 | 52.1% | +0.47 | 5–3 (63%) | 3–3 (50%) | 102.6 | -1.30 |
| 1985 | 1797 | 146.3 | — | — | — | — | +41 | +44 | -194 | 41.9% | -0.55 | 10–7 (59%) | 3–6 (33%) | 101.4 | -1.77 | 1984 | 1915 | 155.4 | — | — | — | — | +5 | -61 | -210 | 64.8% | +1.01 | 3–6 (33%) | 7–3 (70%) | 100.3 | -3.10 |
| 1986 | 1734 | 125.4 | — | — | — | — | +15 | +69 | — | 54.5% | +0.16 | 3–6 (33%) | 3–1 (75%) | 96.8 | +0.68 | 1985 | 1815 | 137.8 | — | — | — | — | +80 | -55 | -189 | 53.1% | +0.34 | 6–4 (60%) | 3–3 (50%) | 98.8 | -1.03 |
| 1987 | 1704 | 131.8 | — | — | — | — | +26 | +55 | -105 | 48.2% | -0.21 | 1–3 (25%) | 0–2 | — | -0.94 | 1986 | 1788 | 137.2 | — | — | — | — | -55 | +53 | — | 46.8% | -0.18 | 7–4 (64%) | 6–3 (67%) | 103.8 | -3.60 |
| 1988 | 1635 | 129.9 | — | — | — | — | +22 | +64 | — | 34.8% | -0.85 | 2–4 (33%) | 0–1 | — | -1.59 | 1987 | 1674 | 114.3 | — | — | — | — | -20 | — | -78 | 41.7% | -0.56 | 3–5 (38%) | 2–1 (67%) | — | -0.56 |
| 1989 | 1626 | 98.2 | — | — | — | — | +3 | — | — | 37.5% | -1.38 | 1–1 | — | — | +0.16 | 1988 | 1552 | 100.5 | — | — | — | — | +26 | +207 | — | 36.4% | -0.79 | 1–4 (20%) | 1–2 (33%) | 92.4 | +1.02 |
| 1990 | 1621 | 109.4 | — | — | — | — | +3 | — | — | 42.9% | -0.71 | 0–1 | 0–1 | — | -0.21 | 1989 | 1547 | 93.6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 0.0% | -5.50 | — | — | — | -0.23 |
| 1991 | 1638 | 118.4 | — | — | — | — | +9 | — | — | 50.0% | -0.10 | — | 1–0 | — | +0.13 | 1990 | 1526 | 90.6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 0.0% | -5.00 | — | — | — | +0.21 |
| Career | 1929 | 145.2 | — | — | — | — | 0 | +15 | -216 | 52.6% | +0.24 | 41–40 (51%) | 21–24 (47%) | 99.3 | -0.52 | Career | 1945 | 143.6 | — | — | — | — | +2 | +5 | -154 | 53.9% | +0.36 | 32–43 (43%) | 38–21 (64%) | 100.1 | -2.23 |
Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.
| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Chris Evert | 1 | 8 | 9 | Jun 18, 1987 | H2H |
| Martina Navratilova | 0 | 6 | 6 | Sep 7, 1987 | H2H |
| Laura Arraya | 2 | 4 | 6 | Jul 23, 1985 | H2H |
| Pam Casale | 4 | 1 | 5 | Mar 9, 1988 | H2H |
| Michelle Torres | 2 | 3 | 5 | Sep 18, 1986 | H2H |
| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Kathy Rinaldi Stunkel | 3 | 7 | 10 | May 10, 1986 | H2H |
| Pilar Vasquez | 5 | 2 | 7 | Apr 6, 1988 | H2H |
| Bonnie Gadusek | 0 | 7 | 7 | Oct 13, 1985 | H2H |
| Bettina Bunge | 1 | 5 | 6 | Feb 19, 1987 | H2H |
| Zina Garrison | 3 | 3 | 6 | Nov 13, 1986 | H2H |