H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Lita Liem vs Chris Evert H2H: 0-1
Chris Evert holds a 1–0 lead over Lita Liem in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Chris Evert leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Chris Evert won the 1974 Rome third round 7-5 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 28, 1974* | Rome | WTA 1000 | R32 | Clay | Chris Evert | 7-5 6-2 | Lita Liem | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lita Liem | — | — | — | 1,728 | 55 | 86 | 39.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Chris Evert | #10 | #1 | 231 | 2,574 | 1,222 | 157 | 88.6% | 18 | 4 | 1 | 8 | 115 | 146 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Lita Liem | Chris Evert | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 1968 | 3–4 | 42.9% | — | 1,504 | 0 | 0 | 1969 | 4–2 | 66.7% | — | 1,560 | 0 | 1 |
| 1969 | 5–10 | 33.3% | — | 1,516 | 0 | 0 | 1970 | 14–4 | 77.8% | — | 1,750 | 0 | 4 |
| 1970 | 4–12 | 25.0% | — | 1,503 | 0 | 0 | 1971 | 28–2 | 93.3% | — | 2,002 | 0 | 11 |
| 1971 | 17–17 | 50.0% | — | 1,657 | 0 | 1 | 1972 | 45–8 | 84.9% | — | 2,235 | 0 | 15 |
| 1972 | 12–22 | 35.3% | — | 1,599 | 0 | 1 | 1973 | 86–9 | 90.5% | — | 2,359 | 0 | 27 |
| 1973 | 3–12 | 20.0% | — | 1,527 | 0 | 1 | 1974 | 93–7 | 93.0% | — | 2,438 | 2 | 39 |
| 1974 | 3–3 | 50.0% | — | 1,565 | 0 | 1 | 1975 | 84–7 | 92.3% | — | 2,508 | 4 | 51 |
| 1975 | 4–5 | 44.4% | — | 1,592 | 0 | 1 | 1976 | 63–5 | 92.6% | — | 2,525 | 6 | 60 |
| 1978 | 4–1 | 80.0% | — | 1,618 | 0 | 1 | 1977 | 63–4 | 94.0% | — | 2,553 | 7 | 71 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1978 | 49–4 | 92.5% | — | 2,568 | 8 | 78 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1979 | 81–14 | 85.3% | — | 2,394 | 9 | 85 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1980 | 66–9 | 88.0% | — | 2,417 | 11 | 93 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1981 | 64–9 | 87.7% | — | 2,423 | 12 | 101 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1982 | 66–6 | 91.7% | — | 2,459 | 14 | 110 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1983 | 59–11 | 84.3% | — | 2,353 | 15 | 116 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1984 | 68–8 | 89.5% | #2 | 2,388 | 16 | 122 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1985 | 77–8 | 90.6% | #2 | 2,417 | 17 | 131 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1986 | 56–6 | 90.3% | #2 | 2,415 | 18 | 137 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1987 | 68–12 | 85.0% | #3 | 2,331 | 18 | 142 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1988 | 61–12 | 83.6% | #3 | 2,285 | 18 | 146 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1989 | 27–10 | 73.0% | #10 | 2,141 | 18 | 146 |