H2H data updated: 2026-09-13 00:00 UTC

Lita Liem vs Chris Evert H2H: 0-1

Chris Evert holds a 1–0 lead over Lita Liem in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Chris Evert leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Chris Evert won the 1974 Italian Open round of 32 7-5 6-2.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Lita Liem
INA
H2H
0 – 1
1 main-draw meetings
Chris Evert
USA Age 71 Right-Handed 168 cm / 5'6"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Chris Evert 7-5 6-2 Lita Liem Match data May 28, 1974* R32 Italian Open WTA 250 Clay

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Lita Liem — — — 1,707 55 86 39.0% 0 0 0 0 1 1
Chris Evert #10 #1 231 2,610 1,228 158 88.6% 18 0 5 13 112 154

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Lita Liem Chris Evert
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
1968 3–4 42.9% — 1,505 0 0 1969 4–2 66.7% — 1,560 0 1
1969 5–10 33.3% — 1,517 0 0 1970 14–4 77.8% — 1,744 0 4
1970 4–12 25.0% — 1,504 0 0 1971 28–2 93.3% — 2,003 0 11
1971 17–17 50.0% — 1,629 0 1 1972 45–8 84.9% — 2,249 0 15
1972 12–22 35.3% — 1,592 0 1 1973 86–9 90.5% — 2,374 0 27
1973 3–12 20.0% — 1,524 0 1 1974 97–7 93.3% — 2,450 2 40
1974 3–3 50.0% — 1,563 0 1 1975 85–7 92.4% #1 2,544 4 53
1975 4–5 44.4% — 1,590 0 1 1976 63–5 92.6% #1 2,545 6 62
1978 4–1 80.0% — 1,616 0 1 1977 63–4 94.0% #1 2,568 7 73
— — — — — — — 1978 49–4 92.5% #2 2,607 8 80
— — — — — — — 1979 81–14 85.3% #2 2,440 9 87
— — — — — — — 1980 66–9 88.0% #1 2,468 11 95
— — — — — — — 1981 64–9 87.7% #1 2,475 12 103
— — — — — — — 1982 66–6 91.7% #2 2,491 14 112
— — — — — — — 1983 59–11 84.3% #2 2,400 15 118
— — — — — — — 1984 68–8 89.5% #2 2,409 16 124
— — — — — — — 1985 77–8 90.6% #2 2,428 17 133
— — — — — — — 1986 56–6 90.3% #2 2,422 18 139
— — — — — — — 1987 68–12 85.0% #3 2,334 18 144
— — — — — — — 1988 62–13 82.7% #3 2,285 18 148
— — — — — — — 1989 27–10 73.0% #10 2,167 18 148

Surface Results by Career Season

Rows are aligned in career order because complete birth data is unavailable. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Lita Liem Chris Evert
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
1968 — — — — — — — — 3 4 7 42.9% — — — — 1969 — — — — 4 2 6 66.7% — — — — — — — —
1969 — — — — 3 5 8 37.5% 2 5 7 28.6% — — — — 1970 — — — — 14 2 16 87.5% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — —
1970 0 1 1 0.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 3 8 11 27.3% — — — — 1971 — — — — 20 1 21 95.2% 8 1 9 88.9% — — — —
1971 2 2 4 50.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 12 12 24 50.0% — — — — 1972 3 1 4 75.0% 19 2 21 90.5% 18 3 21 85.7% 5 2 7 71.4%
1972 1 2 3 33.3% 8 9 17 47.1% 3 8 11 27.3% 0 3 3 0.0% 1973 17 1 18 94.4% 46 4 50 92.0% 15 4 19 78.9% 8 0 8 100.0%
1973 0 1 1 0.0% 3 6 9 33.3% 0 3 3 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 1974 19 1 20 95.0% 40 0 40 100.0% 24 2 26 92.3% 14 4 18 77.8%
1974 — — — — 3 3 6 50.0% — — — — — — — — 1975 26 2 28 92.9% 36 0 36 100.0% 5 2 7 71.4% 18 3 21 85.7%
1975 — — — — 2 4 6 33.3% 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — 1976 12 1 13 92.3% 11 0 11 100.0% 9 0 9 100.0% 31 4 35 88.6%
1978 — — — — — — — — 4 1 5 80.0% — — — — 1977 12 0 12 100.0% 12 0 12 100.0% 8 2 10 80.0% 31 2 33 93.9%
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1978 17 0 17 100.0% 5 0 5 100.0% 10 2 12 83.3% 17 2 19 89.5%
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1979 18 4 22 81.8% 20 1 21 95.2% 12 1 13 92.3% 31 8 39 79.5%
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1980 17 0 17 100.0% 16 0 16 100.0% 10 1 11 90.9% 23 8 31 74.2%
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1981 14 2 16 87.5% 25 1 26 96.2% 16 1 17 94.1% 9 5 14 64.3%
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1982 24 1 25 96.0% 22 2 24 91.7% 10 1 11 90.9% 10 2 12 83.3%
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1983 19 3 22 86.4% 22 0 22 100.0% 2 1 3 66.7% 16 7 23 69.6%
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1984 21 1 22 95.5% 24 3 27 88.9% 16 2 18 88.9% 7 2 9 77.8%
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1985 21 2 23 91.3% 21 1 22 95.5% 16 2 18 88.9% 19 3 22 86.4%
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1986 21 2 23 91.3% 20 1 21 95.2% 5 1 6 83.3% 10 2 12 83.3%
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1987 18 5 23 78.3% 23 2 25 92.0% 9 2 11 81.8% 18 3 21 85.7%
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1988 33 6 39 84.6% 13 2 15 86.7% 5 1 6 83.3% 11 4 15 73.3%
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1989 14 5 19 73.7% 5 2 7 71.4% 7 2 9 77.8% 1 1 2 50.0%
Career 3 6 9 33.3% 23 33 56 41.1% 29 42 71 40.8% 0 5 5 0.0% Career 326 37 363 89.8% 418 26 444 94.1% 205 33 238 86.1% 279 62 341 81.8%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Career Season

Rows are aligned in career order because complete birth data is unavailable. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Lita Liem Chris Evert
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
1968 1505 102.4 — — — — — — +23 41.2% -0.77 2–1 (67%) — — -0.04 1969 1560 117.6 — — — — — +24 — 63.6% +1.18 0–1 — — +0.13
1969 1518 116.8 — — — — — +17 -13 39.4% -0.64 0–3 (0%) — — -0.58 1970 1745 152.4 — — — — — +83 — 77.1% +2.63 0–1 2–0 — -0.34
1970 1505 110.7 — — — — — +24 -33 34.2% -1.21 1–5 (17%) — — -0.65 1971 2004 157.6 — — — — — +17 -224 85.9% +3.36 5–1 (83%) 2–2 (50%) 107.3 +1.65
1971 1629 128.7 — — — — -53 -66 -28 44.9% -0.12 4–1 (80%) 0–2 — +0.73 1972 2250 173.8 — — — — -437 +32 -205 82.6% +2.69 5–2 (71%) 5–2 (71%) 107.2 -7.71
1972 1592 123.6 — — — — -75 +57 -62 36.0% -0.97 4–5 (44%) 0–2 — -2.66 1973 2374 178.1 — — — — -194 +102 -190 87.7% +3.21 8–3 (73%) 8–2 (80%) 110.6 -5.17
1973 1524 112.2 — — — — -27 +75 -32 27.3% -1.61 0–3 (0%) 1–1 — -0.33 1974 2450 180.5 — — — — -56 +162 -92 88.2% +3.37 12–4 (75%) 3–6 (33%) 101.3 -5.59
1974 1564 127.3 — — — — — +70 — 53.8% +0.62 0–1 0–1 — -0.23 1975 2544 181.4 — — — — -55 +162 -225 89.2% +3.37 8–3 (73%) 6–2 (75%) 104.4 -5.18
1975 1590 114.7 — — — — — +30 -54 40.9% -0.18 3–1 (75%) 1–0 — -0.02 1976 2546 179.8 — — — — +44 +128 -121 86.5% +3.11 10–2 (83%) 6–4 (60%) 101.6 -3.21
1978 1616 108.0 — — — — — — -9 72.7% +1.45 1–0 — — +1.17 1977 2568 181.6 — — — — +148 +144 -101 90.7% +3.33 5–1 (83%) 4–1 (80%) 104.6 -2.88
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1978 2608 179.5 — — — — +105 +63 -131 87.1% +3.14 9–3 (75%) 1–1 — -2.79
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1979 2440 178.4 — — — — +13 +292 +61 81.2% +2.78 12–2 (86%) 3–4 (43%) 99.2 -3.99
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1980 2469 177.6 — — — — +80 +330 +100 82.6% +2.79 13–0 (100%) 2–4 (33%) 105.1 -4.31
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1981 2476 182.2 — — — — +9 +291 +130 86.1% +3.10 9–2 (82%) 7–1 (88%) 105.6 -3.95
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1982 2491 179.3 — — — — +62 +255 +73 88.2% +3.33 6–3 (67%) 3–2 (60%) 98.0 -4.01
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1983 2400 176.5 — — — — +47 +316 +178 79.9% +2.28 10–3 (77%) 6–3 (67%) 97.9 -4.38
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1984 2410 175.5 — — — — +69 +207 +137 82.8% +2.90 11–2 (85%) 2–4 (33%) 99.3 -4.61
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1985 2429 176.4 — — — — +30 +241 +127 85.9% +2.88 10–4 (71%) 4–2 (67%) 98.8 -3.55
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1986 2423 177.3 — — — — +9 +241 +113 83.6% +2.78 10–0 (100%) 4–3 (57%) 104.6 -3.45
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1987 2335 176.3 — — — — +23 +294 +200 81.9% +2.62 7–6 (54%) 4–1 (80%) 96.2 -4.20
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1988 2286 173.9 — — — — +34 +319 +231 79.0% +2.37 11–2 (85%) 5–4 (56%) 101.2 -3.52
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1989 2167 158.6 — — — — +40 +347 +265 73.8% +1.59 3–5 (38%) 5–2 (71%) 93.3 -2.18
Career 1708 125.8 — — — — -57 +37 -27 39.9% -0.62 15–20 (43%) 2–6 (25%) 96.9 -1.88 Career 2610 182.0 — — — — +21 +194 -3 84.5% +2.92 164–50 (77%) 82–50 (62%) 105.8 -5.37

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.