H2H data updated: 2026-10-27 00:00 UTC

Lita Liem vs E Siemons H2H: 1-0

Lita Liem holds a 1–0 lead over E Siemons in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Lita Liem leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Lita Liem won the 1972 Dutch Open round of 32 6-1 6-1.

H2H
1 – 0
1 main-draw meetings

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Lita Liem 6-1 6-1 E Siemons Match data Jul 28, 1972* R32 Dutch Open WTA 250 Clay

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Lita Liem — — — 1,707 55 86 39.0% 0 0 0 0 1 1
E Siemons — — — 1,500 0 2 0.0% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Lita Liem E Siemons
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
1968 3–4 42.9% — 1,505 0 0 1972 0–2 0.0% — 1,472 0 0
1969 5–10 33.3% — 1,517 0 0 — — — — — — —
1970 4–12 25.0% — 1,504 0 0 — — — — — — —
1971 17–17 50.0% — 1,629 0 1 — — — — — — —
1972 12–22 35.3% — 1,592 0 1 — — — — — — —
1973 3–12 20.0% — 1,524 0 1 — — — — — — —
1974 3–3 50.0% — 1,563 0 1 — — — — — — —
1975 4–5 44.4% — 1,590 0 1 — — — — — — —
1978 4–1 80.0% — 1,616 0 1 — — — — — — —

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Career Season

Rows are aligned in career order because complete birth data is unavailable. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Lita Liem E Siemons
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
1968 1505 102.4 — — — — — — +23 41.2% -0.77 2–1 (67%) — — -0.04 1972 1472 92.1 — — — — — — — 0.0% -4.25 — — — +0.11
1969 1518 116.8 — — — — — +17 -13 39.4% -0.64 0–3 (0%) — — -0.58 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
1970 1505 110.7 — — — — — +24 -33 34.2% -1.21 1–5 (17%) — — -0.65 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
1971 1629 128.7 — — — — -53 -66 -28 44.9% -0.12 4–1 (80%) 0–2 — +0.73 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
1972 1592 123.6 — — — — -75 +57 -62 36.0% -0.97 4–5 (44%) 0–2 — -2.69 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
1973 1524 112.2 — — — — -27 +75 -32 27.3% -1.61 0–3 (0%) 1–1 — +0.05 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
1974 1564 127.3 — — — — — +70 — 53.8% +0.62 0–1 0–1 — -0.28 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
1975 1590 114.7 — — — — — +30 -54 40.9% -0.18 3–1 (75%) 1–0 — -0.10 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
1978 1616 108.0 — — — — — — -8 72.7% +1.45 1–0 — — +1.17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career 1708 125.8 — — — — -57 +37 -27 39.9% -0.62 15–20 (43%) 2–6 (25%) 96.9 -1.72 Career 1500 95.7 — — — — — — — 0.0% -4.25 — — — +5.50

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.