H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Lita Liem vs Gail Sherriff H2H: 0-2
Gail Sherriff holds a 2–0 lead over Lita Liem in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Gail Sherriff leads 1–0 on clay and 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Gail Sherriff won the 1971 Haverford quarterfinal 7-5 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 21, 1971* | Haverford | WTA 250 | QF | Grass | Gail Sherriff | 7-5 6-4 | Lita Liem | Match data |
| May 31, 1970* | Roland Garros | Grand Slam | R32 | Clay | Gail Sherriff | 7-5 6-2 | Lita Liem | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lita Liem | — | — | — | 1,728 | 55 | 86 | 39.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Gail Sherriff | — | — | — | 1,978 | 342 | 145 | 70.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 41 | 41 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Lita Liem | Gail Sherriff | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 1968 | 3–4 | 42.9% | — | 1,504 | 0 | 0 | 1968 | 65–14 | 82.3% | — | 1,847 | 0 | 13 |
| 1969 | 5–10 | 33.3% | — | 1,516 | 0 | 0 | 1969 | 45–22 | 67.2% | — | 1,800 | 0 | 17 |
| 1970 | 4–12 | 25.0% | — | 1,503 | 0 | 0 | 1970 | 52–19 | 73.2% | — | 1,933 | 0 | 21 |
| 1971 | 17–17 | 50.0% | — | 1,657 | 0 | 1 | 1971 | 49–20 | 71.0% | — | 1,921 | 0 | 23 |
| 1972 | 12–22 | 35.3% | — | 1,599 | 0 | 1 | 1972 | 35–13 | 72.9% | — | 1,860 | 0 | 28 |
| 1973 | 3–12 | 20.0% | — | 1,527 | 0 | 1 | 1973 | 3–7 | 30.0% | — | 1,758 | 0 | 28 |
| 1974 | 3–3 | 50.0% | — | 1,565 | 0 | 1 | 1974 | 30–10 | 75.0% | — | 1,877 | 0 | 34 |
| 1975 | 4–5 | 44.4% | — | 1,592 | 0 | 1 | 1975 | 17–10 | 63.0% | — | 1,833 | 0 | 38 |
| 1978 | 4–1 | 80.0% | — | 1,618 | 0 | 1 | 1976 | 18–10 | 64.3% | — | 1,793 | 0 | 38 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1977 | 0–3 | 0.0% | — | 1,755 | 0 | 38 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1978 | 15–6 | 71.4% | — | 1,772 | 0 | 39 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1979 | 1–4 | 20.0% | — | 1,721 | 0 | 39 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1980 | 9–5 | 64.3% | — | 1,704 | 0 | 40 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1981 | 3–1 | 75.0% | — | 1,711 | 0 | 41 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1982 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,701 | 0 | 41 |