H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Lita Liem vs Judy Tegart H2H: 1-5
Judy Tegart holds a 5–1 lead over Lita Liem in their WTA head-to-head. Across 6 main-draw meetings, Judy Tegart leads 2–1 on clay and 3–0 on grass. Most recently, Judy Tegart won the 1972 St. Petersburg third round 6-3 6-1.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 14, 1972* | St. Petersburg | WTA 500 | R32 | Clay | Judy Tegart | 6-3 6-1 | Lita Liem | Match data |
| Apr 9, 1972* | Jacksonville | WTA 250 | QF | Clay | Lita Liem | 6-4 6-2 | Judy Tegart | Match data |
| Feb 5, 1972* | Fort Lauderdale Pro | WTA 250 | R16 | Clay | Judy Tegart | 6-2 6-4 | Lita Liem | Match data |
| Jan 6, 1970* | Sydney Manly | WTA 250 | QF | Grass | Judy Tegart | 6-4 6-2 | Lita Liem | Match data |
| Dec 11, 1968* | Brisbane | WTA 500 | R16 | Grass | Judy Tegart | 2-6 6-2 6-0 | Lita Liem | Match data |
| Jan 11, 1968* | Hobart | WTA 250 | R32 | Grass | Judy Tegart | 6-3 6-4 | Lita Liem | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lita Liem | — | — | — | 1,728 | 55 | 86 | 39.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Judy Tegart | — | — | — | 2,055 | 281 | 141 | 66.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 13 | 13 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Lita Liem | Judy Tegart | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 1968 | 3–4 | 42.9% | — | 1,504 | 0 | 0 | 1968 | 69–21 | 76.7% | — | 1,800 | 0 | 5 |
| 1969 | 5–10 | 33.3% | — | 1,516 | 0 | 0 | 1969 | 54–21 | 72.0% | — | 1,934 | 0 | 7 |
| 1970 | 4–12 | 25.0% | — | 1,503 | 0 | 0 | 1970 | 45–24 | 65.2% | — | 1,926 | 0 | 7 |
| 1971 | 17–17 | 50.0% | — | 1,657 | 0 | 1 | 1971 | 55–32 | 63.2% | — | 1,939 | 0 | 9 |
| 1972 | 12–22 | 35.3% | — | 1,599 | 0 | 1 | 1972 | 27–25 | 51.9% | — | 1,804 | 0 | 9 |
| 1973 | 3–12 | 20.0% | — | 1,527 | 0 | 1 | 1973 | 1–2 | 33.3% | — | 1,775 | 0 | 10 |
| 1974 | 3–3 | 50.0% | — | 1,565 | 0 | 1 | 1974 | 4–2 | 66.7% | — | 1,780 | 0 | 10 |
| 1975 | 4–5 | 44.4% | — | 1,592 | 0 | 1 | 1975 | 11–4 | 73.3% | — | 1,772 | 0 | 11 |
| 1978 | 4–1 | 80.0% | — | 1,618 | 0 | 1 | 1976 | 1–2 | 33.3% | — | 1,761 | 0 | 11 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1977 | 2–2 | 50.0% | — | 1,755 | 0 | 11 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1978 | 5–3 | 62.5% | — | 1,758 | 0 | 11 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1980 | 0–2 | 0.0% | — | 1,705 | 0 | 11 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1981 | 7–1 | 87.5% | — | 1,736 | 0 | 13 |