H2H data updated: 2026-09-12 00:00 UTC

Lita Liem vs Nancy Yeargin H2H: 0-1

Nancy Yeargin holds a 1–0 lead over Lita Liem in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Nancy Yeargin leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Nancy Yeargin won the 1978 Surbiton quarterfinal 6-4 6-2.

H2H
0 1
1 main-draw meetings
USA Age 71 Right-Handed

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Nancy Yeargin 6-4 6-2 Lita Liem Match data Jun 3, 1978* QF Surbiton WTA 250 Grass

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Lita Liem 1,707 55 86 39.0% 0 0 0 0 1 1
Nancy Yeargin 1,667 42 73 36.5% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Lita Liem Nancy Yeargin
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
1968 3–4 42.9% 1,505 0 0 1972 0–1 0.0% 1,483 0 0
1969 5–10 33.3% 1,517 0 0 1974 0–2 0.0% 1,452 0 0
1970 4–12 25.0% 1,504 0 0 1975 0–4 0.0% 1,410 0 0
1971 17–17 50.0% 1,629 0 1 1976 2–2 50.0% 1,431 0 0
1972 12–22 35.3% 1,592 0 1 1977 1–2 33.3% 1,438 0 0
1973 3–12 20.0% 1,524 0 1 1978 7–3 70.0% 1,554 0 0
1974 3–3 50.0% 1,563 0 1 1979 2–6 25.0% 1,533 0 0
1975 4–5 44.4% 1,590 0 1 1980 2–8 20.0% 1,490 0 0
1978 4–1 80.0% 1,616 0 1 1981 6–7 46.2% 1,568 0 0
1982 11–17 39.3% 1,637 0 0
1983 8–15 34.8% 1,556 0 0
1984 3–6 33.3% 1,552 0 0

Surface Results by Career Season

Rows are aligned in career order because complete birth data is unavailable. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Lita Liem Nancy Yeargin
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
1968 3 4 7 42.9% 1972 0 1 1 0.0%
1969 3 5 8 37.5% 2 5 7 28.6% 1974 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
1970 0 1 1 0.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 3 8 11 27.3% 1975 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
1971 2 2 4 50.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 12 12 24 50.0% 1976 0 1 1 0.0%
1972 1 2 3 33.3% 8 9 17 47.1% 3 8 11 27.3% 0 3 3 0.0% 1978 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 6 1 7 85.7%
1973 0 1 1 0.0% 3 6 9 33.3% 0 3 3 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 1979 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3%
1974 3 3 6 50.0% 1980 0 3 3 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
1975 2 4 6 33.3% 2 1 3 66.7% 1981 1 2 3 33.3% 4 4 8 50.0%
1978 4 1 5 80.0% 1982 4 4 8 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 7 7 14 50.0% 0 5 5 0.0%
1983 3 7 10 30.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 4 4 8 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3%
1984 3 2 5 60.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0%
Career 3 6 9 33.3% 23 33 56 41.1% 29 42 71 40.8% 0 5 5 0.0% Career 11 21 32 34.4% 1 11 12 8.3% 23 23 46 50.0% 3 12 15 20.0%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Career Season

Rows are aligned in career order because complete birth data is unavailable. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Lita Liem Nancy Yeargin
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
1968 1505 102.4 +23 41.2% -0.77 2–1 (67%) -0.04 1972 1484 97.8 0.0% -2.50 +0.23
1969 1518 116.8 +17 -13 39.4% -0.64 0–3 (0%) -0.58 1974 1453 96.0 0.0% -2.50 +0.36
1970 1505 110.7 +24 -33 34.2% -1.21 1–5 (17%) -0.65 1975 1411 92.9 11.1% -3.00 0–1 0–1 +0.17
1971 1629 128.7 -53 -66 -28 44.9% -0.12 4–1 (80%) 0–2 +0.73 1976 1431 102.6 55.6% -0.33 0–1 +0.09
1972 1592 123.6 -75 +57 -62 36.0% -0.97 4–5 (44%) 0–2 -2.66 1977 1439 112.0 33.3% -0.67 -0.27
1973 1524 112.2 -27 +75 -32 27.3% -1.61 0–3 (0%) 1–1 -0.33 1978 1554 127.3 +103 65.2% +1.39 2–1 (67%) 0–2 +0.90
1974 1564 127.3 +70 53.8% +0.62 0–1 0–1 -0.23 1979 1534 102.7 +33 23.5% -1.47 1–0 +0.63
1975 1590 114.7 +30 -54 40.9% -0.18 3–1 (75%) 1–0 -0.02 1980 1490 105.7 -15 +123 22.7% -1.14 1–1 1–5 (17%) +0.35
1978 1616 108.0 -9 72.7% +1.45 1–0 +1.17 1981 1568 127.4 -36 +97 46.4% +0.21 1–1 2–0 +0.18
1982 1638 118.5 -118 +49 38.7% -0.87 4–2 (67%) 3–2 (60%) 104.4 -0.53
1983 1557 103.8 -52 +122 36.5% -1.13 3–3 (50%) 3–1 (75%) 101.5 +2.29
1984 1552 109.3 -32 33.3% -1.28 2–1 (67%) 1–1 +0.22
Career 1708 125.8 -57 +37 -27 39.9% -0.62 15–20 (43%) 2–6 (25%) 96.9 -1.88 Career 1667 117.6 -53 +89 37.3% -0.79 14–11 (56%) 10–12 (45%) 104.9 +4.02

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.