H2H data updated: 2026-09-13 00:00 UTC

Lita Liem vs Pam Teeguarden H2H: 0-1

Pam Teeguarden holds a 1–0 lead over Lita Liem in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Pam Teeguarden leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Pam Teeguarden won the 1975 Roland Garros round of 32 4-6 7-5 9-7.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Lita Liem
INA
H2H
0 – 1
1 main-draw meetings
Pam Teeguarden
USA Age 75 Right-Handed 178 cm / 5'10"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Pam Teeguarden 4-6 7-5 9-7 Lita Liem Match data Jun 10, 1975* R32 Roland Garros Grand Slam Clay

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Lita Liem — — — 1,707 55 86 39.0% 0 0 0 0 1 1
Pam Teeguarden — — — 1,922 246 297 45.3% 0 0 0 0 4 4

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Lita Liem Pam Teeguarden
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
1968 3–4 42.9% — 1,505 0 0 1968 12–17 41.4% — 1,488 0 0
1969 5–10 33.3% — 1,517 0 0 1969 5–11 31.2% — 1,493 0 0
1970 4–12 25.0% — 1,504 0 0 1970 19–19 50.0% — 1,612 0 1
1971 17–17 50.0% — 1,629 0 1 1971 17–21 44.7% — 1,679 0 1
1972 12–22 35.3% — 1,592 0 1 1972 31–25 55.4% — 1,868 0 1
1973 3–12 20.0% — 1,524 0 1 1973 22–23 48.9% — 1,839 0 1
1974 3–3 50.0% — 1,563 0 1 1974 22–18 55.0% — 1,901 0 3
1975 4–5 44.4% — 1,590 0 1 1975 21–25 45.7% — 1,816 0 3
1978 4–1 80.0% — 1,616 0 1 1976 7–14 33.3% — 1,779 0 3
— — — — — — — 1977 14–20 41.2% — 1,762 0 3
— — — — — — — 1978 11–19 36.7% — 1,723 0 3
— — — — — — — 1979 13–19 40.6% — 1,746 0 3
— — — — — — — 1980 17–16 51.5% — 1,802 0 3
— — — — — — — 1981 20–19 51.3% — 1,789 0 4
— — — — — — — 1982 3–10 23.1% — 1,682 0 4
— — — — — — — 1983 4–6 40.0% — 1,651 0 4
— — — — — — — 1984 8–11 42.1% — 1,615 0 4
— — — — — — — 1985 0–4 0.0% — 1,587 0 4

Surface Results by Career Season

Rows are aligned in career order because complete birth data is unavailable. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Lita Liem Pam Teeguarden
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
1968 — — — — — — — — 3 4 7 42.9% — — — — 1968 6 5 11 54.5% 2 3 5 40.0% 2 4 6 33.3% 2 5 7 28.6%
1969 — — — — 3 5 8 37.5% 2 5 7 28.6% — — — — 1969 1 1 2 50.0% 1 4 5 20.0% 3 6 9 33.3% — — — —
1970 0 1 1 0.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 3 8 11 27.3% — — — — 1970 7 3 10 70.0% 4 6 10 40.0% 5 8 13 38.5% 1 1 2 50.0%
1971 2 2 4 50.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 12 12 24 50.0% — — — — 1971 3 2 5 60.0% 10 12 22 45.5% 3 6 9 33.3% 1 1 2 50.0%
1972 1 2 3 33.3% 8 9 17 47.1% 3 8 11 27.3% 0 3 3 0.0% 1972 3 3 6 50.0% 13 9 22 59.1% 15 6 21 71.4% 0 7 7 0.0%
1973 0 1 1 0.0% 3 6 9 33.3% 0 3 3 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 1973 5 4 9 55.6% 7 8 15 46.7% 8 5 13 61.5% 2 6 8 25.0%
1974 — — — — 3 3 6 50.0% — — — — — — — — 1974 6 5 11 54.5% 1 2 3 33.3% 8 4 12 66.7% 6 7 13 46.2%
1975 — — — — 2 4 6 33.3% 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — 1975 2 5 7 28.6% 14 10 24 58.3% 4 2 6 66.7% 1 8 9 11.1%
1978 — — — — — — — — 4 1 5 80.0% — — — — 1976 0 1 1 0.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 4 8 12 33.3%
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1977 2 4 6 33.3% 6 7 13 46.2% 4 4 8 50.0% 2 5 7 28.6%
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1978 2 7 9 22.2% 3 4 7 42.9% 4 3 7 57.1% 2 5 7 28.6%
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1979 5 6 11 45.5% 1 3 4 25.0% 4 3 7 57.1% 3 7 10 30.0%
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1980 6 5 11 54.5% 3 3 6 50.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 6 6 12 50.0%
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1981 1 5 6 16.7% 2 1 3 66.7% 6 4 10 60.0% 6 9 15 40.0%
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1982 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 3 2 5 60.0% 0 6 6 0.0%
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1983 3 3 6 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1984 5 4 9 55.6% 1 3 4 25.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1985 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
Career 3 6 9 33.3% 23 33 56 41.1% 29 42 71 40.8% 0 5 5 0.0% Career 57 66 123 46.3% 70 82 152 46.1% 75 65 140 53.6% 36 83 119 30.3%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Career Season

Rows are aligned in career order because complete birth data is unavailable. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Lita Liem Pam Teeguarden
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
1968 1505 102.4 — — — — — — +23 41.2% -0.77 2–1 (67%) — — -0.04 1968 1489 104.8 — — — — +4 -5 +11 45.0% -0.33 1–5 (17%) — — -0.27
1969 1518 116.8 — — — — — +17 -13 39.4% -0.64 0–3 (0%) — — -0.58 1969 1494 104.2 — — — — — -42 +25 36.1% -1.11 1–3 (25%) — — -0.40
1970 1505 110.7 — — — — — +24 -33 34.2% -1.21 1–5 (17%) — — -0.65 1970 1613 133.6 — — — — +18 -130 -29 52.9% +0.58 2–9 (18%) 0–1 — -0.45
1971 1629 128.7 — — — — -53 -66 -28 44.9% -0.12 4–1 (80%) 0–2 — +0.73 1971 1679 136.1 — — — — +4 -80 -95 47.1% +0.06 3–6 (33%) 0–2 — -0.97
1972 1592 123.6 — — — — -75 +57 -62 36.0% -0.97 4–5 (44%) 0–2 — -2.66 1972 1868 151.0 — — — — -247 -107 -5 55.4% +0.26 4–9 (31%) 1–1 — -7.18
1973 1524 112.2 — — — — -27 +75 -32 27.3% -1.61 0–3 (0%) 1–1 — -0.33 1973 1839 149.0 — — — — -139 -96 +71 50.5% -0.06 6–9 (40%) 4–4 (50%) 100.2 -9.05
1974 1564 127.3 — — — — — +70 — 53.8% +0.62 0–1 0–1 — -0.23 1974 1902 145.5 — — — — -77 -170 +7 52.8% +0.33 6–3 (67%) 3–1 (75%) — -4.34
1975 1590 114.7 — — — — — +30 -54 40.9% -0.18 3–1 (75%) 1–0 — -0.02 1975 1817 144.3 — — — — -102 +1 +94 46.8% -0.11 8–9 (47%) 6–6 (50%) 99.4 -4.08
1978 1616 108.0 — — — — — — -9 72.7% +1.45 1–0 — — +1.17 1976 1779 135.2 — — — — -111 -7 +168 38.0% -1.00 3–5 (38%) — — -3.53
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1977 1763 141.5 — — — — -105 0 +158 41.4% -0.63 3–3 (50%) 4–7 (36%) 98.3 -3.44
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1978 1724 122.7 — — — — -143 -12 +180 36.8% -0.90 5–5 (50%) 3–6 (33%) 97.4 -2.11
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1979 1746 144.0 — — — — -120 -19 +184 42.7% -0.37 5–6 (45%) 4–7 (36%) 99.3 -1.56
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1980 1802 134.4 — — — — -98 -69 +93 48.1% -0.16 7–6 (54%) 3–4 (43%) 101.0 -1.72
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1981 1789 134.6 — — — — -128 -12 +88 52.2% +0.34 6–8 (43%) 3–4 (43%) 97.5 -0.17
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1982 1683 118.4 — — — — -148 — +191 31.3% -1.16 2–4 (33%) 0–1 — +0.19
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1983 1652 106.0 — — — — -83 +79 — 45.8% -0.13 1–3 (25%) 2–3 (40%) 96.0 +0.80
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1984 1615 107.2 — — — — -38 +70 +200 40.9% -0.93 4–2 (67%) 3–1 (75%) 105.0 +1.32
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1985 1588 113.3 — — — — -40 — — 11.1% -2.78 0–1 0–1 — -0.53
Career 1708 125.8 — — — — -57 +37 -27 39.9% -0.62 15–20 (43%) 2–6 (25%) 96.9 -1.88 Career 1923 143.0 — — — — -97 -51 +59 46.5% -0.19 67–96 (41%) 36–49 (42%) 93.3 -6.98

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.