H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 17:48 UTC
Lita Liem vs Sharon Walsh Pete H2H: 0-2
Sharon Walsh Pete holds a 2–0 lead over Lita Liem in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Sharon Walsh Pete leads 2–0 on grass. Most recently, Sharon Walsh Pete won the 1972 US Open second round 7-6 3-6 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 2, 1972* | US Open | Grand Slam | R64 | Grass | Sharon Walsh Pete | 7-6 3-6 6-3 | Lita Liem | Match data |
| Jun 21, 1972* | Queens Club | WTA 250 | R64 | Grass | Sharon Walsh Pete | 6-4 6-2 | Lita Liem | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lita Liem | — | — | — | 1,728 | 55 | 86 | 39.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Sharon Walsh Pete | — | — | — | 1,894 | 300 | 340 | 46.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 7 | 8 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Lita Liem | Sharon Walsh Pete | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 1968 | 3–4 | 42.9% | — | 1,504 | 0 | 0 | 1968 | 1–2 | 33.3% | — | 1,484 | 0 | 0 |
| 1969 | 5–10 | 33.3% | — | 1,516 | 0 | 0 | 1969 | 4–6 | 40.0% | — | 1,524 | 0 | 0 |
| 1970 | 4–12 | 25.0% | — | 1,503 | 0 | 0 | 1970 | 32–16 | 66.7% | — | 1,833 | 0 | 2 |
| 1971 | 17–17 | 50.0% | — | 1,657 | 0 | 1 | 1971 | 10–10 | 50.0% | — | 1,707 | 0 | 2 |
| 1972 | 12–22 | 35.3% | — | 1,599 | 0 | 1 | 1972 | 32–27 | 54.2% | — | 1,729 | 0 | 3 |
| 1973 | 3–12 | 20.0% | — | 1,527 | 0 | 1 | 1973 | 37–33 | 52.9% | — | 1,653 | 0 | 4 |
| 1974 | 3–3 | 50.0% | — | 1,565 | 0 | 1 | 1974 | 27–19 | 58.7% | — | 1,774 | 0 | 7 |
| 1975 | 4–5 | 44.4% | — | 1,592 | 0 | 1 | 1975 | 9–25 | 26.5% | — | 1,661 | 0 | 7 |
| 1978 | 4–1 | 80.0% | — | 1,618 | 0 | 1 | 1976 | 7–10 | 41.2% | — | 1,620 | 0 | 7 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1977 | 17–21 | 44.7% | — | 1,722 | 0 | 7 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1978 | 15–27 | 35.7% | — | 1,677 | 0 | 7 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1979 | 14–22 | 38.9% | — | 1,620 | 0 | 7 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1980 | 16–19 | 45.7% | — | 1,712 | 0 | 7 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1981 | 25–17 | 59.5% | — | 1,841 | 0 | 8 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1982 | 10–19 | 34.5% | — | 1,758 | 0 | 8 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1983 | 15–13 | 53.6% | — | 1,810 | 0 | 8 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1984 | 8–12 | 40.0% | — | 1,808 | 0 | 8 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1985 | 8–17 | 32.0% | — | 1,627 | 0 | 8 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1986 | 2–4 | 33.3% | — | 1,602 | 0 | 8 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1987 | 11–15 | 42.3% | — | 1,598 | 0 | 8 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1988 | 0–6 | 0.0% | — | 1,507 | 0 | 8 |