H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Lita Liem vs Valerie Ziegenfuss H2H: 1-2
Valerie Ziegenfuss holds a 2–1 lead over Lita Liem in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on clay, while Valerie Ziegenfuss leads 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Valerie Ziegenfuss won the 1972 Columbus fourth round 7-6 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 5, 1972* | Columbus | WTA 250 | R16 | Clay | Valerie Ziegenfuss | 7-6 6-3 | Lita Liem | Match data |
| Apr 8, 1972* | Jacksonville | WTA 250 | R16 | Clay | Lita Liem | 6-1 6-3 | Valerie Ziegenfuss | Match data |
| Mar 10, 1972* | Dallas | WTA 250 | R32 | Carpet | Valerie Ziegenfuss | 6-3 6-2 | Lita Liem | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lita Liem | — | — | — | 1,728 | 55 | 86 | 39.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Valerie Ziegenfuss | — | — | — | 1,952 | 231 | 232 | 49.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Lita Liem | Valerie Ziegenfuss | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 1968 | 3–4 | 42.9% | — | 1,504 | 0 | 0 | 1968 | 35–24 | 59.3% | — | 1,586 | 0 | 0 |
| 1969 | 5–10 | 33.3% | — | 1,516 | 0 | 0 | 1969 | 28–24 | 53.8% | — | 1,715 | 0 | 1 |
| 1970 | 4–12 | 25.0% | — | 1,503 | 0 | 0 | 1970 | 40–28 | 58.8% | — | 1,776 | 0 | 2 |
| 1971 | 17–17 | 50.0% | — | 1,657 | 0 | 1 | 1971 | 23–29 | 44.2% | — | 1,796 | 0 | 3 |
| 1972 | 12–22 | 35.3% | — | 1,599 | 0 | 1 | 1972 | 26–24 | 52.0% | — | 1,829 | 0 | 3 |
| 1973 | 3–12 | 20.0% | — | 1,527 | 0 | 1 | 1973 | 33–29 | 53.2% | — | 1,759 | 0 | 3 |
| 1974 | 3–3 | 50.0% | — | 1,565 | 0 | 1 | 1974 | 12–14 | 46.2% | — | 1,786 | 0 | 3 |
| 1975 | 4–5 | 44.4% | — | 1,592 | 0 | 1 | 1975 | 16–16 | 50.0% | — | 1,822 | 0 | 3 |
| 1978 | 4–1 | 80.0% | — | 1,618 | 0 | 1 | 1976 | 12–20 | 37.5% | — | 1,742 | 0 | 3 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1977 | 2–12 | 14.3% | — | 1,674 | 0 | 3 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1978 | 3–11 | 21.4% | — | 1,651 | 0 | 3 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1979 | 1–1 | 50.0% | — | 1,664 | 0 | 3 |