H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Liz Smylie vs Kathy Horvath H2H: 1-1
Liz Smylie and Kathy Horvath are tied 1–1 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Kathy Horvath leads 1–0 on carpet, while Liz Smylie leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Liz Smylie won the 1987 Key Biscayne first round 6-3 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
AUS
Age 63
Right-Handed
166 cm / 5'5"
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
USA
Right-Handed
170 cm / 5'7"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 24, 1987* | Key Biscayne | WTA 250 | R128 | Hard | Liz Smylie | 6-3 6-3 | Kathy Horvath | Match data |
| Nov 12, 1983* | Honolulu | WTA 250 | QF | Carpet | Kathy Horvath | 7-6 6-3 | Liz Smylie | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Liz Smylie | #501 | #20 | 29 | 1,824 | 161 | 188 | 46.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 5 |
| Kathy Horvath | #283 | #10 | 24 | 1,977 | 192 | 155 | 55.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 7 | 7 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Liz Smylie | Kathy Horvath | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 1980 | 11–4 | 73.3% | — | 1,641 | 0 | 1 | 1979 | 0–2 | 0.0% | — | 1,496 | 0 | 0 |
| 1981 | 2–10 | 16.7% | — | 1,528 | 0 | 1 | 1980 | 11–7 | 61.1% | — | 1,619 | 0 | 0 |
| 1982 | 15–8 | 65.2% | — | 1,634 | 0 | 3 | 1981 | 34–23 | 59.6% | — | 1,872 | 0 | 2 |
| 1983 | 20–14 | 58.8% | — | 1,758 | 0 | 4 | 1982 | 15–17 | 46.9% | — | 1,780 | 0 | 2 |
| 1984 | 13–18 | 41.9% | #36 | 1,766 | 0 | 4 | 1983 | 39–18 | 68.4% | — | 1,936 | 0 | 4 |
| 1985 | 16–19 | 45.7% | #43 | 1,730 | 0 | 4 | 1984 | 25–19 | 56.8% | #29 | 1,800 | 0 | 4 |
| 1986 | 6–13 | 31.6% | #114 | 1,669 | 0 | 4 | 1985 | 23–16 | 59.0% | #34 | 1,776 | 0 | 6 |
| 1987 | 20–14 | 58.8% | #27 | 1,747 | 0 | 5 | 1986 | 16–15 | 51.6% | #47 | 1,740 | 0 | 6 |
| 1988 | 4–11 | 26.7% | #153 | 1,597 | 0 | 5 | 1987 | 18–15 | 54.5% | #37 | 1,714 | 0 | 7 |
| 1989 | 21–22 | 48.8% | #66 | 1,679 | 0 | 5 | 1988 | 9–15 | 37.5% | #85 | 1,603 | 0 | 7 |
| 1990 | 15–16 | 48.4% | #53 | 1,664 | 0 | 5 | 1989 | 2–8 | 20.0% | #224 | 1,530 | 0 | 7 |
| 1991 | 9–16 | 36.0% | #116 | 1,612 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1992 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #209 | 1,599 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1993 | 7–15 | 31.8% | #125 | 1,550 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1994 | 2–7 | 22.2% | #192 | 1,515 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |