H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 17:48 UTC
Liz Smylie vs Robin White H2H: 3-1
Liz Smylie holds a 3–1 lead over Robin White in their WTA head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Liz Smylie leads 3–0 on grass, while Robin White leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Liz Smylie won the 1989 Newport third round 7-6 6-7 7-5.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
AUS
Age 63
Right-Handed
166 cm / 5'5"
H2H
3
–
1
4 main draw meetings
USA
Age 62
Right-Handed
172 cm / 5'8"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 20, 1989* | Newport | WTA 250 | R32 | Grass | Liz Smylie | 7-6 6-7 7-5 | Robin White | Match data |
| Jan 18, 1987* | Australian Open | Grand Slam | R32 | Grass | Liz Smylie | 6-1 6-2 | Robin White | Match data |
| Mar 2, 1985* | Hershey | WTA 250 | QF | Hard | Robin White | 7-6 6-3 | Liz Smylie | Match data |
| Jun 27, 1984* | Wimbledon | Grand Slam | R128 | Grass | Liz Smylie | 6-2 6-3 | Robin White | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Liz Smylie | #501 | #20 | 29 | 1,824 | 161 | 188 | 46.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 5 |
| Robin White | #565 | #15 | 37 | 1,878 | 142 | 158 | 47.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Liz Smylie | Robin White | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | 1980 | 11–4 | 73.3% | — | 1,641 | 0 | 1 | 1981 | 1–1 | 50.0% | — | 1,504 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 1981 | 2–10 | 16.7% | — | 1,528 | 0 | 1 | 1982 | 2–1 | 66.7% | — | 1,518 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1982 | 15–8 | 65.2% | — | 1,634 | 0 | 3 | 1983 | 1–4 | 20.0% | — | 1,493 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1983 | 20–14 | 58.8% | — | 1,758 | 0 | 4 | 1984 | 5–10 | 33.3% | #105 | 1,494 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1984 | 13–18 | 41.9% | #36 | 1,766 | 0 | 4 | 1985 | 25–18 | 58.1% | #32 | 1,764 | 0 | 1 |
| 22 | 1985 | 16–19 | 45.7% | #43 | 1,730 | 0 | 4 | 1986 | 23–19 | 54.8% | #16 | 1,790 | 0 | 1 |
| 23 | 1986 | 6–13 | 31.6% | #114 | 1,669 | 0 | 4 | 1987 | 11–14 | 44.0% | #56 | 1,742 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | 1987 | 20–14 | 58.8% | #27 | 1,747 | 0 | 5 | 1988 | 25–18 | 58.1% | #38 | 1,766 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | 1988 | 4–11 | 26.7% | #153 | 1,597 | 0 | 5 | 1989 | 9–15 | 37.5% | #88 | 1,690 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | 1989 | 21–22 | 48.8% | #66 | 1,679 | 0 | 5 | 1990 | 15–15 | 50.0% | #59 | 1,711 | 0 | 1 |
| 27 | 1990 | 15–16 | 48.4% | #53 | 1,664 | 0 | 5 | 1991 | 7–14 | 33.3% | #101 | 1,636 | 0 | 1 |
| 28 | 1991 | 9–16 | 36.0% | #116 | 1,612 | 0 | 5 | 1992 | 13–14 | 48.1% | #56 | 1,622 | 0 | 2 |
| 29 | 1992 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #209 | 1,599 | 0 | 5 | 1993 | 4–12 | 25.0% | #119 | 1,568 | 0 | 2 |
| 30 | 1993 | 7–15 | 31.8% | #125 | 1,550 | 0 | 5 | 1994 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #281 | 1,539 | 0 | 2 |
| 31 | 1994 | 2–7 | 22.2% | #192 | 1,515 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |