H2H data updated: 2026-10-27 00:00 UTC

Liz Smylie vs Robin White H2H: 3-1

Liz Smylie holds a 3–1 lead over Robin White in their WTA head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Liz Smylie leads 3–0 on grass, while Robin White leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Liz Smylie won the 1989 Newport round of 32 7-6 6-7 7-5.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Liz Smylie
AUS Age 63 Right-Handed 166 cm / 5'5"
H2H
3 – 1
4 main-draw meetings
Robin White
USA Age 62 Right-Handed 172 cm / 5'8"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Liz Smylie #80 7-6 6-7 7-5 Robin White #54 Match data Jul 20, 1989* R32 Newport WTA 250 Grass
Liz Smylie #77 6-1 6-2 Robin White #16 Match data Jan 18, 1987* R32 Australian Open Grand Slam Grass
Robin White #91 7-6 6-3 Liz Smylie #40 Match data Mar 2, 1985* QF Hershey WTA 250 Hard
Liz Smylie #66 6-2 6-3 Robin White #121 Match data Jun 27, 1984* R128 Wimbledon Grand Slam Grass

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Liz Smylie — #20 29 1,824 161 189 46.0% 0 0 0 1 4 5
Robin White — #15 37 1,878 142 158 47.3% 0 0 0 0 2 2

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Liz Smylie Robin White
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 1980 11–4 73.3% — 1,630 0 1 1981 1–1 50.0% — 1,504 0 0
18 1981 2–10 16.7% — 1,515 0 1 1982 2–1 66.7% — 1,518 0 0
19 1982 15–8 65.2% — 1,628 0 3 1983 1–4 20.0% — 1,493 0 0
20 1983 20–14 58.8% — 1,754 0 4 1984 5–10 33.3% #105 1,495 0 0
21 1984 13–18 41.9% #36 1,765 0 4 1985 25–18 58.1% #32 1,763 0 1
22 1985 16–19 45.7% #43 1,730 0 4 1986 23–19 54.8% #16 1,789 0 1
23 1986 6–13 31.6% #114 1,669 0 4 1987 11–14 44.0% #56 1,743 0 1
24 1987 20–14 58.8% #27 1,748 0 5 1988 25–18 58.1% #38 1,766 0 1
25 1988 4–12 25.0% #153 1,607 0 5 1989 9–15 37.5% #88 1,689 0 1
26 1989 21–22 48.8% #66 1,682 0 5 1990 15–15 50.0% #59 1,711 0 1
27 1990 15–16 48.4% #53 1,665 0 5 1991 7–14 33.3% #101 1,636 0 1
28 1991 9–16 36.0% #116 1,612 0 5 1992 13–14 48.1% #56 1,622 0 2
29 1992 0–1 0.0% #209 1,599 0 5 1993 4–12 25.0% #119 1,568 0 2
30 1993 7–15 31.8% #125 1,549 0 5 1994 1–3 25.0% #281 1,540 0 2
31 1994 2–7 22.2% #192 1,515 0 5 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Liz Smylie Robin White
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
17 1980 — — — — — — — — 10 3 13 76.9% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 1981 0 4 4 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 4 4 0.0% — — — — 1982 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 1982 0 2 2 0.0% 8 1 9 88.9% 7 5 12 58.3% — — — — 1983 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 1 3 4 25.0% — — — —
20 1983 5 2 7 71.4% 2 2 4 50.0% 12 7 19 63.2% 1 3 4 25.0% 1984 3 6 9 33.3% — — — — 2 3 5 40.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
21 1984 0 5 5 0.0% 0 4 4 0.0% 11 5 16 68.8% 2 4 6 33.3% 1985 11 6 17 64.7% — — — — 8 6 14 57.1% 6 6 12 50.0%
22 1985 5 8 13 38.5% — — — — 9 7 16 56.3% 2 4 6 33.3% 1986 2 5 7 28.6% 2 2 4 50.0% 8 4 12 66.7% 11 8 19 57.9%
23 1986 2 5 7 28.6% 0 3 3 0.0% 4 3 7 57.1% 0 2 2 0.0% 1987 4 7 11 36.4% — — — — 4 4 8 50.0% 3 3 6 50.0%
24 1987 8 5 13 61.5% 0 1 1 0.0% 12 6 18 66.7% 0 2 2 0.0% 1988 19 13 32 59.4% — — — — 5 3 8 62.5% 1 2 3 33.3%
25 1988 1 5 6 16.7% — — — — 3 5 8 37.5% 0 2 2 0.0% 1989 6 8 14 42.9% 0 1 1 0.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 1 3 4 25.0%
26 1989 14 14 28 50.0% 0 3 3 0.0% 5 4 9 55.6% 2 1 3 66.7% 1990 9 10 19 47.4% — — — — 4 2 6 66.7% 2 3 5 40.0%
27 1990 11 9 20 55.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 1991 2 9 11 18.2% — — — — 2 2 4 50.0% 3 3 6 50.0%
28 1991 4 9 13 30.8% 0 1 1 0.0% 5 3 8 62.5% 0 3 3 0.0% 1992 12 8 20 60.0% — — — — 1 2 3 33.3% 0 4 4 0.0%
29 1992 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 1993 2 9 11 18.2% — — — — 2 2 4 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
30 1993 1 8 9 11.1% 0 1 1 0.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 1994 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 1994 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — 1 2 3 33.3% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 51 80 131 38.9% 11 19 30 36.7% 84 60 144 58.3% 13 29 42 31.0% — 73 86 159 45.9% 2 3 5 40.0% 39 34 73 53.4% 27 34 61 44.3%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Liz Smylie Robin White
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
17 1980 1631 113.8 — — — — — — +66 63.6% +0.73 4–1 (80%) 2–2 (50%) 103.1 +1.28 1981 1505 105.7 — — — — — — — 50.0% +1.00 — — — -0.06
18 1981 1516 99.1 — — — — +29 +16 +113 20.0% -1.68 0–3 (0%) 0–1 — +0.89 1982 1518 105.9 — — — — +74 — — 71.4% +1.57 0–1 — — +0.70
19 1982 1629 117.0 — — — — — +36 +60 59.3% +0.70 8–2 (80%) 3–4 (43%) 106.2 +1.74 1983 1493 101.3 — — — — — — +63 30.8% -1.31 1–2 (33%) 1–1 — +0.29
20 1983 1755 135.9 — — — — -170 -34 +77 54.4% +0.25 8–5 (62%) 3–3 (50%) 104.5 +2.04 1984 1495 104.0 — — — — +20 — +92 38.9% -0.67 2–4 (33%) 0–1 — +1.11
21 1984 1766 123.0 — — — — -246 -130 +139 45.6% -0.50 3–5 (38%) 2–2 (50%) 98.6 -1.30 1985 1764 139.4 — — — — -12 — -119 55.8% +0.51 10–8 (56%) 4–3 (57%) 106.8 +0.26
22 1985 1730 128.2 — — — — -158 — +131 47.1% -0.38 7–8 (47%) 3–3 (50%) 99.5 -0.26 1986 1790 138.5 — — — — -26 -221 -18 51.0% -0.15 11–5 (69%) 4–4 (50%) 105.9 -1.39
23 1986 1669 119.1 — — — — -123 -108 +185 38.5% -0.67 2–3 (40%) 3–5 (38%) 96.1 -0.67 1987 1744 140.6 — — — — -18 — +36 51.7% -0.10 0–8 (0%) 4–3 (57%) 90.6 -1.18
24 1987 1748 133.3 — — — — -128 — +163 57.7% +0.17 5–5 (50%) 2–1 (67%) 102.3 +0.17 1988 1766 136.1 — — — — -10 — +22 56.9% +0.51 8–10 (44%) 8–4 (67%) 99.8 +1.17
25 1988 1607 97.6 — — — — -89 — +199 25.7% -1.91 4–1 (80%) 1–2 (33%) 102.1 +1.24 1989 1689 131.2 — — — — -8 — +56 45.0% -0.12 3–9 (25%) 1–6 (14%) 89.5 -0.85
26 1989 1682 124.9 — — — — -33 -171 +107 47.1% -0.16 10–6 (63%) 5–7 (42%) 101.1 +1.69 1990 1711 133.4 — — — — -36 — +99 50.0% -0.01 3–5 (38%) 5–3 (63%) 100.1 -0.04
27 1990 1666 124.4 — — — — +4 — +122 47.1% -0.23 7–3 (70%) 2–5 (29%) 101.1 +0.59 1991 1637 120.5 — — — — -47 — +161 34.8% -1.02 2–2 (50%) 2–3 (40%) 99.1 +0.47
28 1991 1613 115.0 — — — — -43 — +187 37.9% -1.31 4–4 (50%) 4–1 (80%) 103.0 -0.32 1992 1623 126.4 — — — — -14 — +161 47.6% -0.02 5–4 (56%) 0–3 (0%) 99.7 +1.71
29 1992 1600 99.2 — — — — — — — 0.0% -4.00 — — — +0.01 1993 1569 127.2 — — — — -40 — +233 33.3% -1.03 2–5 (29%) 1–2 (33%) 97.1 -0.72
30 1993 1550 117.2 — — — — -36 — +259 37.0% -0.70 4–6 (40%) 0–2 — +0.46 1994 1540 105.6 — — — — -30 — — 40.0% -0.60 0–2 1–0 — +0.68
31 1994 1515 99.5 — — — — -31 — +232 31.6% -1.79 1–2 (33%) — — +0.11 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1824 127.4 — — — — -80 -43 +132 46.2% -0.37 67–54 (55%) 30–38 (44%) 100.0 +2.21 — 1879 138.6 — — — — -18 -221 +31 48.7% -0.06 47–65 (42%) 31–33 (48%) 95.6 +0.72

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.