H2H data updated: 2026-09-12 00:00 UTC

Lori Mcneil vs Patricia Medrado H2H: 1-0

Lori Mcneil holds a 1–0 lead over Patricia Medrado in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Lori Mcneil leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Lori Mcneil won the 1987 Houston round of 32 6-4 6-4.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Lori Mcneil
USA Age 62 Right-Handed 170 cm / 5'7"
H2H
1 – 0
1 main-draw meetings
Patricia Medrado
BRA Age 69

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Lori Mcneil #13 6-4 6-4 Patricia Medrado #106 Match data Apr 23, 1987* R32 Houston WTA 250 Clay

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Lori Mcneil #867 #9 303 2,024 377 273 58.0% 0 0 0 1 10 11
Patricia Medrado #359 #67 9 1,836 152 163 48.3% 0 0 0 0 10 10

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Lori Mcneil Patricia Medrado
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 1980 0–1 0.0% — 1,484 0 0 — — — — — — —
17 1981 2–0 100.0% — 1,520 0 1 — — — — — — —
18 1982 1–2 33.3% — 1,503 0 1 1975 3–1 75.0% — 1,535 0 0
19 1983 6–5 54.5% — 1,568 0 1 1976 0–2 0.0% — 1,517 0 0
20 1984 7–11 38.9% #97 1,608 0 1 1977 2–3 40.0% — 1,527 0 1
21 1985 13–23 36.1% #93 1,587 0 1 1978 6–11 35.3% — 1,582 0 1
22 1986 42–22 65.6% #14 1,884 0 3 1979 3–6 33.3% — 1,599 0 1
23 1987 54–24 69.2% #11 2,007 0 3 1980 22–10 68.8% — 1,647 0 4
24 1988 46–20 69.7% #13 1,901 0 5 1981 38–20 65.5% — 1,738 0 8
25 1989 24–22 52.2% #36 1,760 0 6 1982 33–25 56.9% — 1,778 0 10
26 1990 17–20 45.9% #52 1,695 0 6 1983 4–18 18.2% — 1,576 0 10
27 1991 39–21 65.0% #19 1,870 0 8 1984 11–15 42.3% #108 1,588 0 10
28 1992 37–20 64.9% #15 1,962 0 9 1985 8–14 36.4% #108 1,542 0 10
29 1993 27–19 58.7% #25 1,898 0 10 1986 12–14 46.2% #76 1,561 0 10
30 1994 26–15 63.4% #17 1,871 0 11 1987 6–13 31.6% #117 1,550 0 10
31 1995 19–19 50.0% #34 1,804 0 11 1988 4–11 26.7% #180 1,473 0 10
32 1996 8–14 36.4% #83 1,727 0 11 — — — — — — —
33 1997 1–7 12.5% #301 1,656 0 11 — — — — — — —
34 1998 8–6 57.1% #91 1,718 0 11 — — — — — — —
35 1999 0–2 0.0% #869 1,670 0 11 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Lori Mcneil Patricia Medrado
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
18 1982 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 1975 — — — — 3 1 4 75.0% — — — — — — — —
19 1983 5 3 8 62.5% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1976 — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — —
20 1984 3 2 5 60.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 3 5 8 37.5% 0 1 1 0.0% 1977 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
21 1985 5 7 12 41.7% 3 7 10 30.0% 2 5 7 28.6% 3 4 7 42.9% 1978 3 5 8 37.5% 3 3 6 50.0% — — — — 0 3 3 0.0%
22 1986 20 7 27 74.1% 4 5 9 44.4% 10 4 14 71.4% 8 6 14 57.1% 1979 1 1 2 50.0% 2 1 3 66.7% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0%
23 1987 19 6 25 76.0% 7 4 11 63.6% 9 6 15 60.0% 19 8 27 70.4% 1980 — — — — 9 8 17 52.9% — — — — — — — —
24 1988 22 10 32 68.8% 8 4 12 66.7% 12 3 15 80.0% 4 3 7 57.1% 1981 6 5 11 54.5% 10 9 19 52.6% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
25 1989 10 8 18 55.6% 4 5 9 44.4% 4 4 8 50.0% 6 5 11 54.5% 1982 2 6 8 25.0% 27 9 36 75.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 3 9 12 25.0%
26 1990 8 11 19 42.1% 0 3 3 0.0% 8 3 11 72.7% 1 3 4 25.0% 1983 2 7 9 22.2% 2 6 8 25.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 3 3 0.0%
27 1991 24 10 34 70.6% 1 2 3 33.3% 6 3 9 66.7% 8 6 14 57.1% 1984 3 5 8 37.5% 8 7 15 53.3% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
28 1992 13 9 22 59.1% 3 3 6 50.0% 10 2 12 83.3% 11 6 17 64.7% 1985 1 5 6 16.7% 4 7 11 36.4% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
29 1993 11 8 19 57.9% 2 5 7 28.6% 10 2 12 83.3% 4 4 8 50.0% 1986 4 6 10 40.0% 8 6 14 57.1% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
30 1994 6 6 12 50.0% 4 3 7 57.1% 11 2 13 84.6% 5 4 9 55.6% 1987 1 4 5 20.0% 5 9 14 35.7% — — — — — — — —
31 1995 4 7 11 36.4% 1 4 5 20.0% 7 3 10 70.0% 7 5 12 58.3% 1988 1 3 4 25.0% 3 7 10 30.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
32 1996 3 6 9 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 4 3 7 57.1% 1 4 5 20.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 1997 1 4 5 20.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 1998 5 3 8 62.5% 1 2 3 33.3% 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 1999 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 160 110 270 59.3% 39 52 91 42.9% 99 49 148 66.9% 77 60 137 56.2% — 25 49 74 33.8% 84 75 159 52.8% 1 9 10 10.0% 3 21 24 12.5%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Lori Mcneil Patricia Medrado
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
16 1980 1485 95.1 — — — — — — — 0.0% -4.50 — — — +0.17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 1981 1521 104.9 — — — — — — — 100.0% +4.50 — — — +0.24 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 1982 1503 100.0 — — — — — — — 42.9% -0.14 0–1 0–1 — +0.35 1975 1535 102.4 — — — — — +33 — 75.0% +1.25 — — — +1.01
19 1983 1569 107.1 — — — — +44 — — 53.8% +0.19 2–2 (50%) 0–1 — +1.06 1976 1517 92.1 — — — — — — — 0.0% -4.25 — — — -0.02
20 1984 1608 115.2 — — — — +12 -54 +10 38.1% -0.81 4–2 (67%) 1–1 — +0.27 1977 1528 97.0 — — — — +38 — — 33.3% -2.22 0–1 1–0 — +0.68
21 1985 1587 118.3 — — — — +22 -103 +5 39.2% -0.85 2–5 (29%) 3–5 (38%) 96.4 -0.20 1978 1582 115.6 — — — — +3 -32 — 36.6% -1.05 5–2 (71%) — — -0.14
22 1986 1884 144.9 — — — — -9 -341 -107 60.5% +0.68 16–10 (62%) 12–9 (57%) 109.2 +1.49 1979 1600 122.4 — — — — -32 +22 — 40.9% -1.45 1–3 (25%) 5–0 (100%) 102.1 -0.16
23 1987 2007 158.4 — — — — +54 -355 -205 63.8% +0.91 16–9 (64%) 12–1 (92%) 109.8 -0.78 1980 1647 127.0 — — — — — -68 — 64.9% +1.30 6–4 (60%) 1–4 (20%) 98.0 +0.78
24 1988 1901 142.6 — — — — +37 -185 +39 62.9% +0.76 19–10 (66%) 8–5 (62%) 105.0 +2.06 1981 1739 134.1 — — — — -124 -50 — 63.3% +1.20 7–7 (50%) 6–9 (40%) 96.5 +2.58
25 1989 1760 134.7 — — — — +60 -78 +79 52.0% +0.07 5–7 (42%) 5–6 (45%) 96.3 -0.23 1982 1779 140.8 — — — — -197 +94 — 56.6% +0.45 6–11 (35%) 7–3 (70%) 99.2 -1.37
26 1990 1695 134.9 — — — — +14 -74 +200 48.2% -0.08 4–9 (31%) 5–6 (45%) 90.4 -0.80 1983 1577 104.0 — — — — -93 +205 — 24.0% -1.80 2–4 (33%) 1–3 (25%) 94.8 +0.53
27 1991 1870 151.0 — — — — +12 -241 +42 60.4% +0.77 13–6 (68%) 9–10 (47%) 104.2 -0.74 1984 1588 120.4 — — — — -112 +162 — 48.3% -0.34 0–6 (0%) 5–3 (63%) 95.2 +0.36
28 1992 1962 156.8 — — — — -4 -303 +76 63.6% +0.94 8–10 (44%) 10–9 (53%) 96.7 -0.46 1985 1542 114.5 — — — — -92 +100 — 39.1% -0.22 0–2 1–3 (25%) — +0.78
29 1993 1899 147.7 — — — — -6 -291 +192 58.1% +0.61 6–7 (46%) 3–9 (25%) 95.3 -0.38 1986 1562 123.2 — — — — -82 +112 — 49.2% +0.11 5–8 (38%) 5–2 (71%) 99.4 +1.15
30 1994 1871 145.9 — — — — -58 -207 +244 61.1% +0.69 7–8 (47%) 7–5 (58%) 98.9 -0.52 1987 1551 107.8 — — — — -107 +50 — 39.1% -0.48 2–6 (25%) 3–1 (75%) 97.0 +0.64
31 1995 1805 142.2 — — — — -13 -206 +304 53.8% +0.38 5–12 (29%) 4–8 (33%) 91.4 -0.26 1988 1473 104.6 — — — — -66 +64 — 31.4% -1.20 2–3 (40%) 1–1 — +1.44
32 1996 1727 130.2 — — — — -12 — +384 36.5% -0.65 5–3 (63%) 2–7 (22%) 96.5 -0.48 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 1997 1656 120.2 — — — — +31 — — 22.2% -1.61 0–2 0–1 — -1.12 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 1998 1719 129.4 — — — — +1 -154 +315 51.4% +0.09 5–2 (71%) 0–2 — -0.58 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 1999 1671 99.0 — — — — — — — 20.0% -0.80 0–1 0–1 — +0.18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 2025 149.2 — — — — +14 -212 +86 56.0% +0.41 117–106 (52%) 81–87 (48%) 98.3 -0.11 — 1837 128.4 — — — — -99 +60 — 49.5% +0.04 36–57 (39%) 36–29 (55%) 95.0 +2.62

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.