H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Louise Allen vs Caryn Copeland Wilson H2H: 1-1
Louise Allen and Caryn Copeland Wilson are tied 1–1 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Caryn Copeland Wilson leads 1–0 on grass, while Louise Allen leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Caryn Copeland Wilson won the 1986 Newport third round 6-2 3-6 7-6.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 17, 1986* | Newport | WTA 250 | R32 | Grass | Caryn Copeland Wilson | 6-2 3-6 7-6 | Louise Allen | Match data |
| Jul 9, 1982* | Oklahoma City | WTA 250 | R16 | Hard | Louise Allen | 6-0 6-1 | Caryn Copeland Wilson | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Louise Allen | — | — | — | 1,759 | 67 | 100 | 40.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
| Caryn Copeland Wilson | — | — | — | 1,531 | 11 | 18 | 37.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Louise Allen | Caryn Copeland Wilson | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | 1980 | 3–2 | 60.0% | — | 1,520 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1981 | 6–5 | 54.5% | — | 1,541 | 0 | 0 | 1980 | 2–3 | 40.0% | — | 1,483 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1982 | 22–5 | 81.5% | — | 1,737 | 0 | 3 | 1981 | 1–3 | 25.0% | — | 1,467 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1983 | 3–7 | 30.0% | — | 1,706 | 0 | 3 | 1982 | 4–4 | 50.0% | — | 1,475 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1984 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,686 | 0 | 3 | 1983 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,463 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1984 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,451 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1986 | 0–4 | 0.0% | — | 1,612 | 0 | 3 | 1985 | 2–3 | 40.0% | — | 1,447 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 1987 | 3–8 | 27.3% | — | 1,565 | 0 | 3 | 1986 | 2–2 | 50.0% | — | 1,480 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 1988 | 5–8 | 38.5% | — | 1,584 | 0 | 3 | 1987 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,461 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 1989 | 9–15 | 37.5% | — | 1,561 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 1990 | 2–9 | 18.2% | — | 1,492 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 1991 | 2–8 | 20.0% | — | 1,453 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 1992 | 10–14 | 41.7% | — | 1,577 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 1993 | 2–14 | 12.5% | — | 1,451 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |