H2H data updated: 2026-09-14 00:00 UTC

Louise Allen vs Mary Joe Fernandez H2H: 0-1

Mary Joe Fernandez holds a 1–0 lead over Louise Allen in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Mary Joe Fernandez leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Mary Joe Fernandez won the 1989 Wimbledon round of 64 6-4 6-1.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Louise Allen
USA Age 64
H2H
0 – 1
1 main-draw meetings
Mary Joe Fernandez
USA Age 55 Right-Handed 176 cm / 5'9"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Mary Joe Fernandez #16 6-4 6-1 Louise Allen Match data Jun 30, 1989* R64 Wimbledon Grand Slam Grass

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Louise Allen — — — 1,758 67 100 40.1% 0 0 0 0 3 3
Mary Joe Fernandez #136 #4 2,114 2,196 417 195 68.1% 0 1 0 5 1 7

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Louise Allen Mary Joe Fernandez
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
12 — — — — — — — 1984 0–2 0.0% — 1,474 0 0
13 — — — — — — — 1985 5–6 45.5% #99 1,553 0 0
14 — — — — — — — 1986 18–14 56.2% #27 1,765 0 0
15 — — — — — — — 1987 24–14 63.2% #20 1,896 0 0
16 — — — — — — — 1988 22–11 66.7% #15 1,947 0 0
17 — — — — — — — 1989 32–15 68.1% #12 1,985 0 0
18 1980 3–2 60.0% — 1,519 0 0 1990 40–10 80.0% #4 2,125 0 2
19 1981 6–5 54.5% — 1,540 0 0 1991 47–18 72.3% #8 2,062 0 2
20 1982 22–5 81.5% — 1,736 0 3 1992 51–17 75.0% #6 2,121 0 2
21 1983 3–7 30.0% — 1,706 0 3 1993 34–13 72.3% #7 2,058 0 3
22 1984 0–1 0.0% — 1,685 0 3 1994 21–9 70.0% #14 1,977 0 4
23 — — — — — — — 1995 29–11 72.5% #8 2,039 0 6
24 1986 0–4 0.0% — 1,611 0 3 1996 30–17 63.8% #16 1,935 0 6
25 1987 3–8 27.3% — 1,564 0 3 1997 39–16 70.9% #10 1,990 0 7
26 1988 5–8 38.5% — 1,584 0 3 1998 8–8 50.0% #77 1,935 0 7
27 1989 9–15 37.5% — 1,561 0 3 1999 17–13 56.7% #38 1,901 0 7
28 1990 2–9 18.2% — 1,492 0 3 2000 0–1 0.0% #136 1,880 0 7
29 1991 2–8 20.0% — 1,453 0 3 — — — — — — —
30 1992 10–14 41.7% — 1,576 0 3 — — — — — — —
31 1993 2–14 12.5% — 1,451 0 3 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Louise Allen Mary Joe Fernandez
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
12 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1984 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
13 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1985 5 4 9 55.6% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — —
14 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1986 7 5 12 58.3% 10 5 15 66.7% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 2 2 0.0%
15 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1987 9 5 14 64.3% 9 5 14 64.3% 3 2 5 60.0% 3 2 5 60.0%
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1988 11 5 16 68.8% 3 3 6 50.0% 7 2 9 77.8% 1 1 2 50.0%
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1989 11 6 17 64.7% 6 2 8 75.0% 6 2 8 75.0% 9 5 14 64.3%
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1990 17 4 21 81.0% 7 3 10 70.0% 3 1 4 75.0% 13 2 15 86.7%
19 1981 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 1991 22 8 30 73.3% 11 4 15 73.3% 9 2 11 81.8% 5 4 9 55.6%
20 1982 13 4 17 76.5% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 1992 27 8 35 77.1% 12 4 16 75.0% 6 2 8 75.0% 6 3 9 66.7%
21 1983 1 1 2 50.0% 0 3 3 0.0% 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — 1993 16 4 20 80.0% 12 3 15 80.0% 3 2 5 60.0% 3 4 7 42.9%
22 1984 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 1994 13 5 18 72.2% 6 2 8 75.0% 2 1 3 66.7% 0 1 1 0.0%
23 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1995 14 4 18 77.8% 4 4 8 50.0% 4 1 5 80.0% 7 2 9 77.8%
24 1986 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 1996 13 8 21 61.9% 8 4 12 66.7% 8 2 10 80.0% 1 3 4 25.0%
25 1987 1 3 4 25.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 1997 22 8 30 73.3% 13 4 17 76.5% 3 2 5 60.0% 1 2 3 33.3%
26 1988 5 7 12 41.7% — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 1998 7 6 13 53.8% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
27 1989 8 12 20 40.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1999 9 8 17 52.9% 7 3 10 70.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
28 1990 2 8 10 20.0% — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 2000 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 1991 2 6 8 25.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 1992 7 5 12 58.3% 1 4 5 20.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 1993 1 6 7 14.3% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 3 3 0.0% 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 40 56 96 41.7% 4 16 20 20.0% 5 12 17 29.4% 0 10 10 0.0% — 203 91 294 69.0% 109 49 158 69.0% 55 22 77 71.4% 50 33 83 60.2%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Louise Allen Mary Joe Fernandez
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
12 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1984 1475 98.2 — — — — — — — 20.0% -1.20 0–1 — — +0.18
13 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1985 1554 130.0 — — — — +65 — — 50.0% +0.04 0–2 2–0 — -0.49
14 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1986 1765 147.3 — — — — -82 -11 -174 54.2% +0.32 5–3 (63%) 4–2 (67%) 107.3 -4.54
15 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1987 1897 158.0 — — — — -60 -77 -252 61.2% +1.15 5–4 (56%) 2–4 (33%) 100.5 -5.16
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1988 1947 151.0 — — — — -47 -156 -175 68.2% +1.45 5–1 (83%) 0–4 (0%) 103.5 -2.13
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1989 1986 162.4 — — — — -24 -108 -155 63.2% +1.20 9–3 (75%) 4–6 (40%) 104.1 -2.80
18 1980 1520 102.6 — — — — — — — 60.0% +0.40 2–0 1–0 — +0.07 1990 2126 168.3 — — — — +40 -229 -238 79.2% +2.17 7–2 (78%) 4–0 (100%) 107.8 +0.66
19 1981 1540 111.9 — — — — — — — 53.6% +0.64 3–3 (50%) 1–3 (25%) 98.7 -0.03 1991 2063 164.9 — — — — +20 -103 -62 69.6% +1.53 5–6 (45%) 3–1 (75%) 97.9 -0.78
20 1982 1736 132.6 — — — — -16 — — 75.4% +2.03 5–2 (71%) 2–2 (50%) 103.9 +2.84 1992 2121 171.9 — — — — +33 -59 -48 69.4% +1.32 11–2 (85%) 6–5 (55%) 106.9 -1.97
21 1983 1706 117.7 — — — — — -183 -107 33.3% -1.67 0–1 1–1 — -0.80 1993 2058 164.0 — — — — +1 +127 -28 66.1% +1.05 11–4 (73%) 9–3 (75%) 105.3 +0.67
22 1984 1686 96.2 — — — — — — — 33.3% -2.67 0–1 — — +0.11 1994 1977 147.9 — — — — +8 +146 +2 66.2% +0.96 6–5 (55%) 6–2 (75%) 99.6 +0.06
23 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1995 2039 159.3 — — — — +38 -7 -10 64.8% +1.11 10–1 (91%) 4–3 (57%) 107.6 -0.51
24 1986 1612 101.4 — — — — — — — 20.0% -1.50 0–2 0–2 — +0.38 1996 1935 158.7 — — — — -4 +81 +198 61.9% +1.09 7–0 (100%) 2–6 (25%) 103.3 -1.36
25 1987 1565 110.9 — — — — +20 -55 — 32.0% -1.28 1–2 (33%) 1–2 (33%) 97.0 +0.16 1997 1990 164.4 — — — — +18 +53 +117 66.9% +1.20 10–5 (67%) 2–4 (33%) 100.0 -1.63
26 1988 1584 119.3 — — — — -2 — — 45.7% -0.20 3–6 (33%) 2–2 (50%) 97.4 -0.03 1998 1935 150.6 — — — — +21 — — 50.0% -0.03 3–1 (75%) 4–2 (67%) 101.7 -1.81
27 1989 1561 113.9 — — — — -23 — — 43.1% -0.66 3–7 (30%) 5–2 (71%) 100.1 +0.22 1999 1902 152.1 — — — — -1 +93 — 56.5% +0.72 6–5 (55%) 1–6 (14%) 93.5 -2.78
28 1990 1493 106.1 — — — — -19 — — 21.7% -1.39 0–1 0–3 (0%) — +0.64 2000 1881 102.8 — — — — — — — 0.0% -2.00 — — — -0.21
29 1991 1453 100.2 — — — — -9 — — 31.8% -1.54 1–3 (25%) 1–0 — +0.75 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 1992 1576 125.0 — — — — +2 -118 -27 41.8% -0.80 4–3 (57%) 2–2 (50%) 103.6 -0.19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 1993 1452 91.9 — — — — +19 +6 +65 20.6% -2.12 1–3 (25%) 2–3 (40%) 96.2 +0.76 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1759 120.5 — — — — -7 -89 -37 43.6% -0.45 23–34 (40%) 18–22 (45%) 95.9 +2.92 — 2197 168.6 — — — — +6 -13 -56 64.9% +1.15 100–45 (69%) 53–48 (52%) 107.6 -4.04

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.