H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC
Louise Allen vs Naoko Sawamatsu H2H: 0-3
Naoko Sawamatsu holds a 3–0 lead over Louise Allen in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Naoko Sawamatsu leads 2–0 on hard courts and 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Naoko Sawamatsu won the 1993 Eastbourne second round 6-2 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
Age 64
H2H
0
–
3
3 main draw meetings
JPN
Age 53
Right-Handed
167 cm / 5'6"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 16, 1993* | Eastbourne | WTA 250 | R64 | Grass | Naoko Sawamatsu | 6-2 6-3 | Louise Allen | Match data |
| Aug 17, 1992 | Toronto | WTA 1000 | R32 | Hard | Naoko Sawamatsu | 6-1 6-0 | Louise Allen | Match data |
| Apr 14, 1990* | Tokyo Japan Open | WTA 250 | R16 | Hard | Naoko Sawamatsu | 7-6 7-5 | Louise Allen | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Louise Allen | — | — | — | 1,759 | 67 | 100 | 40.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
| Naoko Sawamatsu | #266 | #14 | 881 | 1,971 | 182 | 127 | 58.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 1 | 4 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Louise Allen | Naoko Sawamatsu | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1989 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #262 | 1,478 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1990 | 14–6 | 70.0% | #31 | 1,669 | 0 | 1 |
| 18 | 1980 | 3–2 | 60.0% | — | 1,520 | 0 | 0 | 1991 | 21–16 | 56.8% | #33 | 1,723 | 0 | 1 |
| 19 | 1981 | 6–5 | 54.5% | — | 1,541 | 0 | 0 | 1992 | 23–12 | 65.7% | #24 | 1,865 | 0 | 1 |
| 20 | 1982 | 22–5 | 81.5% | — | 1,737 | 0 | 3 | 1993 | 24–13 | 64.9% | #28 | 1,855 | 0 | 2 |
| 21 | 1983 | 3–7 | 30.0% | — | 1,706 | 0 | 3 | 1994 | 24–12 | 66.7% | #26 | 1,872 | 0 | 3 |
| 22 | 1984 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,686 | 0 | 3 | 1995 | 22–13 | 62.9% | #17 | 1,848 | 0 | 3 |
| 23 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1996 | 18–16 | 52.9% | #38 | 1,807 | 0 | 3 |
| 24 | 1986 | 0–4 | 0.0% | — | 1,612 | 0 | 3 | 1997 | 24–19 | 55.8% | #34 | 1,847 | 0 | 4 |
| 25 | 1987 | 3–8 | 27.3% | — | 1,565 | 0 | 3 | 1998 | 12–18 | 40.0% | #55 | 1,720 | 0 | 4 |
| 26 | 1988 | 5–8 | 38.5% | — | 1,584 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 1989 | 9–15 | 37.5% | — | 1,561 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 1990 | 2–9 | 18.2% | — | 1,492 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 1991 | 2–8 | 20.0% | — | 1,453 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 1992 | 10–14 | 41.7% | — | 1,577 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 1993 | 2–14 | 12.5% | — | 1,451 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |