H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 08:25 UTC
Louise Allen vs Silke Meier H2H: 1-0
Louise Allen holds a 1–0 lead over Silke Meier in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Louise Allen leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Louise Allen won the 1989 Wimbledon first round 7-6 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
Age 64
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
GER
Age 58
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 28, 1989* | Wimbledon | Grand Slam | R128 | Grass | Louise Allen | 7-6 6-2 | Silke Meier | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Louise Allen | — | — | — | 1,759 | 67 | 100 | 40.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
| Silke Meier | #948 | #40 | 101 | 1,667 | 81 | 141 | 36.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Louise Allen | Silke Meier | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1985 | 3–3 | 50.0% | #164 | 1,512 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1986 | 10–10 | 50.0% | #85 | 1,594 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 1980 | 3–2 | 60.0% | — | 1,520 | 0 | 0 | 1987 | 10–13 | 43.5% | #50 | 1,592 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1981 | 6–5 | 54.5% | — | 1,541 | 0 | 0 | 1988 | 8–16 | 33.3% | #99 | 1,590 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1982 | 22–5 | 81.5% | — | 1,737 | 0 | 3 | 1989 | 7–14 | 33.3% | #148 | 1,555 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1983 | 3–7 | 30.0% | — | 1,706 | 0 | 3 | 1990 | 6–13 | 31.6% | #132 | 1,529 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1984 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,686 | 0 | 3 | 1991 | 4–9 | 30.8% | #138 | 1,511 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1992 | 10–13 | 43.5% | #80 | 1,586 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1986 | 0–4 | 0.0% | — | 1,612 | 0 | 3 | 1993 | 6–16 | 27.3% | #151 | 1,520 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 1987 | 3–8 | 27.3% | — | 1,565 | 0 | 3 | 1994 | 5–9 | 35.7% | #113 | 1,528 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 1988 | 5–8 | 38.5% | — | 1,584 | 0 | 3 | 1995 | 10–14 | 41.7% | #91 | 1,534 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 1989 | 9–15 | 37.5% | — | 1,561 | 0 | 3 | 1996 | 2–10 | 16.7% | #205 | 1,488 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 1990 | 2–9 | 18.2% | — | 1,492 | 0 | 3 | 1997 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #234 | 1,482 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 1991 | 2–8 | 20.0% | — | 1,453 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 1992 | 10–14 | 41.7% | — | 1,577 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 1993 | 2–14 | 12.5% | — | 1,451 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |