H2H data updated: 2026-09-14 00:00 UTC

Lourdes Domínguez Lino vs Edina Gallovits Hall H2H: 0-2

Edina Gallovits Hall holds a 2–0 lead over Lourdes Domínguez Lino in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Edina Gallovits Hall leads 2–0 on clay. Most recently, Edina Gallovits Hall won the 2010 Bogotá Open first round 6-2 6-1.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Lourdes Domínguez Lino
Spain Age 45 Right-Handed 163 cm / 5'4"
H2H
0 – 2
2 main-draw meetings
Edina Gallovits Hall
ROU Age 41 Right-Handed 165 cm / 5'5"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Edina Gallovits Hall 6-2 6-1 Lourdes Domínguez Lino #147 Match data Feb 18, 2010* R32 Bogotá Open International → modern equivalent WTA 250 Clay
Edina Gallovits Hall 6-4 6-2 Lourdes Domínguez Lino #58 Match data Jun 15, 2007* R16 Barcelona Tier IV → modern equivalent WTA 250 Clay

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Lourdes Domínguez Lino #1,129 #40 1,305 1,673 125 157 44.3% 0 0 0 0 2 2
Edina Gallovits Hall — — — 1,640 50 80 38.5% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Lourdes Domínguez Lino Edina Gallovits Hall
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 — — — — — — — 2002 1–1 50.0% — 1,498 0 0
18 — — — — — — — 2003 0–1 0.0% — 1,490 0 0
19 2000 0–1 0.0% #141 1,489 0 0 2004 0–3 0.0% — 1,468 0 0
20 2001 0–1 0.0% #378 1,479 0 0 2005 0–4 0.0% — 1,439 0 0
21 2002 4–3 57.1% #390 1,518 0 0 — — — — — — —
22 2003 0–1 0.0% #319 1,503 0 0 2007 9–12 42.9% — 1,466 0 0
23 2004 1–1 50.0% #208 1,508 0 0 2008 13–14 48.1% — 1,570 0 0
24 2005 6–4 60.0% #72 1,553 0 0 2009 10–15 40.0% — 1,556 0 0
25 2006 21–19 52.5% #52 1,623 0 1 2010 9–9 50.0% — 1,610 0 0
26 2007 16–21 43.2% #71 1,557 0 1 2011 2–9 18.2% — 1,514 0 0
27 2008 6–11 35.3% #91 1,507 0 1 2012 6–8 42.9% — 1,528 0 0
28 2009 6–13 31.6% #134 1,477 0 1 2013 0–2 0.0% — 1,517 0 0
29 2010 2–4 33.3% #85 1,487 0 1 — — — — — — —
30 2011 16–16 50.0% #79 1,574 0 2 2015 0–2 0.0% — 1,492 0 0
31 2012 16–16 50.0% #48 1,652 0 2 — — — — — — —
32 2013 17–22 43.6% #69 1,620 0 2 — — — — — — —
33 2014 7–11 38.9% #110 1,568 0 2 — — — — — — —
34 2015 4–5 44.4% #100 1,550 0 2 — — — — — — —
35 2016 3–8 27.3% #220 1,516 0 2 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Lourdes Domínguez Lino Edina Gallovits Hall
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2002 — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — —
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2003 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
19 2000 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 2004 — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
20 2001 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 2005 0 4 4 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
21 2002 — — — — 4 3 7 57.1% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
22 2003 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 2007 2 7 9 22.2% 7 4 11 63.6% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
23 2004 — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — 2008 5 6 11 45.5% 7 7 14 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
24 2005 — — — — 6 4 10 60.0% — — — — — — — — 2009 4 7 11 36.4% 6 7 13 46.2% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
25 2006 7 10 17 41.2% 14 8 22 63.6% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2010 3 5 8 37.5% 5 3 8 62.5% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
26 2007 3 9 12 25.0% 13 11 24 54.2% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2011 0 4 4 0.0% 2 4 6 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
27 2008 0 4 4 0.0% 6 7 13 46.2% — — — — — — — — 2012 2 2 4 50.0% 4 5 9 44.4% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
28 2009 1 3 4 25.0% 5 9 14 35.7% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2013 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 2010 2 2 4 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 2011 3 6 9 33.3% 11 8 19 57.9% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — 2015 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
31 2012 10 8 18 55.6% 5 7 12 41.7% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 2013 1 8 9 11.1% 16 11 27 59.3% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2014 0 5 5 0.0% 6 5 11 54.5% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 2015 0 1 1 0.0% 4 4 8 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 2016 0 3 3 0.0% 3 5 8 37.5% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 27 59 86 31.4% 94 88 182 51.6% 4 9 13 30.8% 0 1 1 0.0% — 16 37 53 30.2% 32 35 67 47.8% 2 8 10 20.0% — — — —

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Lourdes Domínguez Lino Edina Gallovits Hall
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2002 1498 102.4 — — — — — — — 60.0% +1.00 0–1 1–0 — +0.29
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2003 1491 97.5 +0.73 +1.48 0.600 36.3% — — — 0.0% -5.50 — — — -0.05
19 2000 1489 98.2 — — — — — — — 33.3% -2.33 0–1 1–0 — -0.06 2004 1468 96.0 — — — — — — — 0.0% -3.83 — — — -0.36
20 2001 1480 100.7 — — — — — — — 0.0% -3.50 — — — -0.06 2005 1439 103.6 +0.73 -0.75 0.778 44.7% +49 — — 20.0% -2.60 0–2 — — -0.49
21 2002 1519 112.4 — — — — — +41 — 57.1% +0.14 — 2–1 (67%) — +0.22 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
22 2003 1503 98.5 — — — — — — — 0.0% -3.00 — — — +0.07 2007 1466 109.9 -2.61 -1.75 0.910 48.0% -48 +144 — 47.6% -0.10 2–4 (33%) 0–1 — +0.72
23 2004 1509 105.8 — — — — — — — 50.0% +1.34 1–1 0–1 — +0.01 2008 1571 123.3 -0.46 -1.71 0.934 48.9% -87 +65 — 43.4% -0.25 2–1 (67%) 2–2 (50%) 102.0 -0.82
24 2005 1553 117.7 — — — — — +72 — 61.9% +0.38 0–1 3–1 (75%) — +0.23 2009 1557 111.8 -2.93 -2.15 0.835 46.1% -49 +63 — 39.3% -0.95 4–2 (67%) 1–1 — -0.20
25 2006 1623 121.0 — — — — -68 +93 — 51.2% -0.30 4–4 (50%) 5–3 (63%) 102.8 +0.22 2010 1611 116.9 0.00 -0.02 0.947 49.1% -91 +65 — 46.5% -0.02 5–2 (71%) 0–1 — -0.01
26 2007 1558 113.3 — — — — -56 +110 — 43.2% -0.49 4–3 (57%) 2–2 (50%) 100.6 -0.29 2011 1514 99.0 -2.49 -3.10 0.821 45.9% -40 +110 — 29.6% -1.52 1–4 (20%) 2–0 — +0.42
27 2008 1508 107.1 — — — — -48 +107 — 37.8% -1.11 1–4 (20%) 1–0 — -0.03 2012 1529 107.3 -1.22 -1.02 0.927 48.4% -36 +83 — 43.8% -0.72 2–2 (50%) 1–0 — +0.26
28 2009 1477 108.0 — — — — -35 +83 — 37.8% -0.82 2–5 (29%) 2–5 (29%) 95.2 +0.87 2013 1518 103.7 -0.63 +3.58 0.427 31.0% — — — 0.0% -5.25 — — — -0.41
29 2010 1487 102.6 — — — — 0 — — 35.7% -1.36 1–1 0–1 — +0.13 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 2011 1575 121.5 — — — — -73 0 +20 50.0% +0.11 6–6 (50%) 1–7 (13%) 95.2 +0.42 2015 1493 93.2 -1.08 -3.59 0.676 43.0% — — — 20.0% -2.80 0–1 1–0 — +0.08
31 2012 1653 124.6 — — — — -17 -96 — 54.3% +0.04 2–6 (25%) 4–1 (80%) 100.6 0.00 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 2013 1620 121.2 — — — — -86 +113 — 41.3% -0.81 10–8 (56%) 2–3 (40%) 103.9 -1.33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2014 1569 107.5 — — — — -102 +137 — 40.0% -0.89 1–0 1–2 (33%) — +0.57 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 2015 1550 113.7 -1.03 +0.35 0.984 50.1% — +126 — 50.0% -0.05 1–3 (25%) 2–0 — +0.51 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 2016 1517 97.5 -3.20 -2.29 0.761 44.1% -86 +117 — 25.0% -1.75 2–2 (50%) 0–2 — -0.18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1674 120.0 -2.29 -1.18 0.851 46.6% -55 +78 +20 45.2% -0.48 35–45 (44%) 26–29 (47%) 98.8 +0.46 — 1641 114.5 -1.43 -1.46 0.874 47.2% -54 +86 — 39.6% -0.79 16–19 (46%) 8–5 (62%) 102.9 -0.44

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.