H2H data updated: 2026-09-13 00:00 UTC

Lourdes Domínguez Lino vs Iveta Benesova H2H: 2-0

Lourdes Domínguez Lino holds a 2–0 lead over Iveta Benesova in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Lourdes Domínguez Lino leads 1–0 on clay and 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Lourdes Domínguez Lino won the 2008 Vina Del Mar round of 32 6-2 7-5.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Lourdes Domínguez Lino
Spain Age 45 Right-Handed 163 cm / 5'4"
H2H
2 – 0
2 main-draw meetings
Iveta Benesova
CZE Age 43 Left-Handed 170 cm / 5'7"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Lourdes Domínguez Lino #87 6-2 7-5 Iveta Benesova #137 Match data Feb 14, 2008* R32 Vina Del Mar Tier III → modern equivalent WTA 250 Clay
Lourdes Domínguez Lino #43 6-1 5-7 6-2 Iveta Benesova #60 Match data Aug 25, 2006* R16 Forest Hills Tier IV → modern equivalent WTA 250 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Lourdes Domínguez Lino #1,129 #40 1,305 1,673 125 157 44.3% 0 0 0 0 2 2
Iveta Benesova #671 #25 1,811 1,762 178 223 44.4% 0 0 0 0 2 2

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Lourdes Domínguez Lino Iveta Benesova
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
19 2000 0–1 0.0% #141 1,489 0 0 2002 6–9 40.0% #82 1,564 0 0
20 2001 0–1 0.0% #378 1,479 0 0 2003 9–19 32.1% #132 1,478 0 0
21 2002 4–3 57.1% #390 1,518 0 0 2004 25–20 55.6% #36 1,646 0 1
22 2003 0–1 0.0% #319 1,503 0 0 2005 21–27 43.8% #55 1,610 0 1
23 2004 1–1 50.0% #208 1,508 0 0 2006 17–21 44.7% #58 1,592 0 1
24 2005 6–4 60.0% #72 1,553 0 0 2007 6–14 30.0% #116 1,521 0 1
25 2006 21–19 52.5% #52 1,623 0 1 2008 21–18 53.8% #43 1,652 0 1
26 2007 16–21 43.2% #71 1,557 0 1 2009 29–25 53.7% #38 1,647 0 1
27 2008 6–11 35.3% #91 1,507 0 1 2010 18–24 42.9% #59 1,637 0 2
28 2009 6–13 31.6% #134 1,477 0 1 2011 16–24 40.0% #54 1,626 0 2
29 2010 2–4 33.3% #85 1,487 0 1 2012 10–17 37.0% #81 1,579 0 2
30 2011 16–16 50.0% #79 1,574 0 2 — — — — — — —
31 2012 16–16 50.0% #48 1,652 0 2 2014 0–5 0.0% #671 1,519 0 2
32 2013 17–22 43.6% #69 1,620 0 2 — — — — — — —
33 2014 7–11 38.9% #110 1,568 0 2 — — — — — — —
34 2015 4–5 44.4% #100 1,550 0 2 — — — — — — —
35 2016 3–8 27.3% #220 1,516 0 2 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Lourdes Domínguez Lino Iveta Benesova
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
19 2000 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 2002 4 2 6 66.7% 1 5 6 16.7% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
20 2001 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 2003 4 5 9 44.4% 4 10 14 28.6% 0 2 2 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3%
21 2002 — — — — 4 3 7 57.1% — — — — — — — — 2004 11 13 24 45.8% 14 6 20 70.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
22 2003 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 2005 13 16 29 44.8% 6 6 12 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 2 3 5 40.0%
23 2004 — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — 2006 11 11 22 50.0% 4 7 11 36.4% 1 2 3 33.3% 1 1 2 50.0%
24 2005 — — — — 6 4 10 60.0% — — — — — — — — 2007 4 6 10 40.0% 1 7 8 12.5% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
25 2006 7 10 17 41.2% 14 8 22 63.6% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2008 8 8 16 50.0% 13 8 21 61.9% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — —
26 2007 3 9 12 25.0% 13 11 24 54.2% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2009 16 14 30 53.3% 11 8 19 57.9% 2 2 4 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
27 2008 0 4 4 0.0% 6 7 13 46.2% — — — — — — — — 2010 10 14 24 41.7% 8 8 16 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
28 2009 1 3 4 25.0% 5 9 14 35.7% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2011 13 15 28 46.4% 2 7 9 22.2% 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
29 2010 2 2 4 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — 2012 9 9 18 50.0% 1 5 6 16.7% 0 3 3 0.0% — — — —
30 2011 3 6 9 33.3% 11 8 19 57.9% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 2012 10 8 18 55.6% 5 7 12 41.7% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — 2014 0 3 3 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — —
32 2013 1 8 9 11.1% 16 11 27 59.3% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2014 0 5 5 0.0% 6 5 11 54.5% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 2015 0 1 1 0.0% 4 4 8 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 2016 0 3 3 0.0% 3 5 8 37.5% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 27 59 86 31.4% 94 88 182 51.6% 4 9 13 30.8% 0 1 1 0.0% — 103 116 219 47.0% 65 79 144 45.1% 5 18 23 21.7% 5 10 15 33.3%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Lourdes Domínguez Lino Iveta Benesova
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
19 2000 1489 98.2 — — — — — — — 33.3% -2.33 0–1 1–0 — -0.06 2002 1564 116.6 — — — — +44 -100 — 47.4% -0.47 2–6 (25%) 4–2 (67%) 98.8 -0.65
20 2001 1480 100.7 — — — — — — — 0.0% -3.50 — — — -0.06 2003 1479 107.1 — — — — +105 -55 — 38.2% -0.94 4–8 (33%) 3–5 (38%) 95.1 +0.69
21 2002 1519 112.4 — — — — — +41 — 57.1% +0.14 — 2–1 (67%) — +0.22 2004 1647 128.5 — — — — -23 +14 — 53.9% +0.09 9–5 (64%) 4–4 (50%) 106.0 +0.27
22 2003 1503 98.5 — — — — — — — 0.0% -3.00 — — — +0.07 2005 1610 122.9 — — — — -28 +68 — 43.2% -0.50 13–9 (59%) 2–7 (22%) 99.0 -0.22
23 2004 1509 105.8 — — — — — — — 50.0% +1.34 1–1 0–1 — +0.01 2006 1592 112.3 — — — — +38 +5 -151 40.9% -0.93 10–4 (71%) 5–4 (56%) 106.6 -0.26
24 2005 1553 117.7 — — — — — +72 — 61.9% +0.38 0–1 3–1 (75%) — +0.23 2007 1521 104.5 — — — — +85 -42 — 34.1% -1.25 3–3 (50%) 4–6 (40%) 97.1 -0.37
25 2006 1623 121.0 — — — — -68 +93 — 51.2% -0.30 4–4 (50%) 5–3 (63%) 102.8 +0.22 2008 1652 126.5 — — — — -4 -18 — 50.5% +0.30 9–6 (60%) 1–2 (33%) 102.8 -0.69
26 2007 1558 113.3 — — — — -56 +110 — 43.2% -0.49 4–3 (57%) 2–2 (50%) 100.6 -0.29 2009 1647 132.9 — — — — +22 +22 -131 50.9% +0.18 9–1 (90%) 4–3 (57%) 109.1 +1.09
27 2008 1508 107.1 — — — — -48 +107 — 37.8% -1.11 1–4 (20%) 1–0 — -0.03 2010 1637 121.1 — — — — +2 +1 — 44.7% -0.61 4–6 (40%) 4–2 (67%) 99.9 +0.03
28 2009 1477 108.0 — — — — -35 +83 — 37.8% -0.82 2–5 (29%) 2–5 (29%) 95.2 +0.87 2011 1627 135.9 — — — — +26 -37 — 40.2% -0.68 3–5 (38%) 0–3 (0%) 95.4 -2.20
29 2010 1487 102.6 — — — — 0 — — 35.7% -1.36 1–1 0–1 — +0.13 2012 1579 127.8 — — — — +90 -3 -125 33.9% -1.08 5–2 (71%) 4–4 (50%) 102.9 -1.52
30 2011 1575 121.5 — — — — -73 0 +20 50.0% +0.11 6–6 (50%) 1–7 (13%) 95.2 +0.42 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 2012 1653 124.6 — — — — -17 -96 — 54.3% +0.04 2–6 (25%) 4–1 (80%) 100.6 0.00 2014 1520 96.7 -2.44 -2.36 0.746 44.1% +94 — — 0.0% -2.70 — 0–2 — -0.26
32 2013 1620 121.2 — — — — -86 +113 — 41.3% -0.81 10–8 (56%) 2–3 (40%) 103.9 -1.33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2014 1569 107.5 — — — — -102 +137 — 40.0% -0.89 1–0 1–2 (33%) — +0.57 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 2015 1550 113.7 -1.03 +0.35 0.984 50.1% — +126 — 50.0% -0.05 1–3 (25%) 2–0 — +0.51 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 2016 1517 97.5 -3.20 -2.29 0.761 44.1% -86 +117 — 25.0% -1.75 2–2 (50%) 0–2 — -0.18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1674 120.0 -2.29 -1.18 0.851 46.6% -55 +78 +20 45.2% -0.48 35–45 (44%) 26–29 (47%) 98.8 +0.46 — 1763 127.5 -2.44 -2.36 0.746 44.1% +22 -6 -135 44.0% -0.47 71–55 (56%) 35–44 (44%) 101.5 -1.02

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.