H2H data updated: 2026-09-14 00:00 UTC

Lourdes Domínguez Lino vs Jamea Jackson H2H: 0-1

Jamea Jackson holds a 1–0 lead over Lourdes Domínguez Lino in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Jamea Jackson leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Jamea Jackson won the 2006 Canadian Open round of 64 6-1 6-0.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Lourdes Domínguez Lino
Spain Age 45 Right-Handed 163 cm / 5'4"
H2H
0 – 1
1 main-draw meetings
Jamea Jackson
USA Age 40 Right-Handed 163 cm / 5'4"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Jamea Jackson #56 6-1 6-0 Lourdes Domínguez Lino #43 Match data Aug 16, 2006* R64 Canadian Open Tier I → modern equivalent WTA 1000 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Lourdes Domínguez Lino #1,129 #40 1,305 1,673 125 157 44.3% 0 0 0 0 2 2
Jamea Jackson #382 #43 479 1,662 33 50 39.8% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Lourdes Domínguez Lino Jamea Jackson
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 — — — — — — — 2003 0–1 0.0% #444 1,491 0 0
17 — — — — — — — 2004 2–5 28.6% #156 1,482 0 0
18 — — — — — — — 2005 10–14 41.7% #80 1,520 0 0
19 2000 0–1 0.0% #141 1,489 0 0 2006 19–19 50.0% #45 1,608 0 0
20 2001 0–1 0.0% #378 1,479 0 0 2007 0–6 0.0% #588 1,539 0 0
21 2002 4–3 57.1% #390 1,518 0 0 2008 2–5 28.6% #273 1,529 0 0
22 2003 0–1 0.0% #319 1,503 0 0 — — — — — — —
23 2004 1–1 50.0% #208 1,508 0 0 — — — — — — —
24 2005 6–4 60.0% #72 1,553 0 0 — — — — — — —
25 2006 21–19 52.5% #52 1,623 0 1 — — — — — — —
26 2007 16–21 43.2% #71 1,557 0 1 — — — — — — —
27 2008 6–11 35.3% #91 1,507 0 1 — — — — — — —
28 2009 6–13 31.6% #134 1,477 0 1 — — — — — — —
29 2010 2–4 33.3% #85 1,487 0 1 — — — — — — —
30 2011 16–16 50.0% #79 1,574 0 2 — — — — — — —
31 2012 16–16 50.0% #48 1,652 0 2 — — — — — — —
32 2013 17–22 43.6% #69 1,620 0 2 — — — — — — —
33 2014 7–11 38.9% #110 1,568 0 2 — — — — — — —
34 2015 4–5 44.4% #100 1,550 0 2 — — — — — — —
35 2016 3–8 27.3% #220 1,516 0 2 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Lourdes Domínguez Lino Jamea Jackson
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2003 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2004 1 4 5 20.0% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2005 6 11 17 35.3% 1 1 2 50.0% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — —
19 2000 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 2006 11 13 24 45.8% 2 4 6 33.3% 6 2 8 75.0% — — — —
20 2001 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 2007 0 3 3 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — —
21 2002 — — — — 4 3 7 57.1% — — — — — — — — 2008 2 5 7 28.6% — — — — — — — — — — — —
22 2003 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
23 2004 — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
24 2005 — — — — 6 4 10 60.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
25 2006 7 10 17 41.2% 14 8 22 63.6% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
26 2007 3 9 12 25.0% 13 11 24 54.2% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
27 2008 0 4 4 0.0% 6 7 13 46.2% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 2009 1 3 4 25.0% 5 9 14 35.7% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 2010 2 2 4 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 2011 3 6 9 33.3% 11 8 19 57.9% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 2012 10 8 18 55.6% 5 7 12 41.7% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 2013 1 8 9 11.1% 16 11 27 59.3% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2014 0 5 5 0.0% 6 5 11 54.5% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 2015 0 1 1 0.0% 4 4 8 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 2016 0 3 3 0.0% 3 5 8 37.5% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 27 59 86 31.4% 94 88 182 51.6% 4 9 13 30.8% 0 1 1 0.0% — 20 37 57 35.1% 3 6 9 33.3% 10 7 17 58.8% — — — —

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Lourdes Domínguez Lino Jamea Jackson
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2003 1492 100.0 — — — — — — — 0.0% -3.50 — — — -0.13
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2004 1483 106.1 -0.74 -0.28 0.892 47.5% -1 — — 46.7% -0.07 0–3 (0%) 0–3 (0%) — -0.03
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2005 1521 117.6 -0.08 -0.13 1.020 50.4% -39 — +118 43.6% -0.38 3–4 (43%) 4–1 (80%) 103.8 -0.78
19 2000 1489 98.2 — — — — — — — 33.3% -2.33 0–1 1–0 — -0.06 2006 1609 128.7 -0.56 +0.41 1.005 50.0% -63 -80 +192 53.5% +0.27 6–8 (43%) 3–8 (27%) 98.3 +0.35
20 2001 1480 100.7 — — — — — — — 0.0% -3.50 — — — -0.06 2007 1540 95.2 -4.69 -3.50 0.583 38.5% -33 — — 7.7% -3.54 0–1 — — -0.44
21 2002 1519 112.4 — — — — — +41 — 57.1% +0.14 — 2–1 (67%) — +0.22 2008 1530 101.3 -3.99 -0.29 0.755 43.5% -25 — — 28.6% -2.21 0–2 1–0 — -0.20
22 2003 1503 98.5 — — — — — — — 0.0% -3.00 — — — +0.07 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
23 2004 1509 105.8 — — — — — — — 50.0% +1.34 1–1 0–1 — +0.01 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
24 2005 1553 117.7 — — — — — +72 — 61.9% +0.38 0–1 3–1 (75%) — +0.23 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
25 2006 1623 121.0 — — — — -68 +93 — 51.2% -0.30 4–4 (50%) 5–3 (63%) 102.8 +0.22 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
26 2007 1558 113.3 — — — — -56 +110 — 43.2% -0.49 4–3 (57%) 2–2 (50%) 100.6 -0.29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
27 2008 1508 107.1 — — — — -48 +107 — 37.8% -1.11 1–4 (20%) 1–0 — -0.03 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 2009 1477 108.0 — — — — -35 +83 — 37.8% -0.82 2–5 (29%) 2–5 (29%) 95.2 +0.87 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 2010 1487 102.6 — — — — 0 — — 35.7% -1.36 1–1 0–1 — +0.13 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 2011 1575 121.5 — — — — -73 0 +20 50.0% +0.11 6–6 (50%) 1–7 (13%) 95.2 +0.42 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 2012 1653 124.6 — — — — -17 -96 — 54.3% +0.04 2–6 (25%) 4–1 (80%) 100.6 0.00 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 2013 1620 121.2 — — — — -86 +113 — 41.3% -0.81 10–8 (56%) 2–3 (40%) 103.9 -1.33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2014 1569 107.5 — — — — -102 +137 — 40.0% -0.89 1–0 1–2 (33%) — +0.57 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 2015 1550 113.7 -1.03 +0.35 0.984 50.1% — +126 — 50.0% -0.05 1–3 (25%) 2–0 — +0.51 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 2016 1517 97.5 -3.20 -2.29 0.761 44.1% -86 +117 — 25.0% -1.75 2–2 (50%) 0–2 — -0.18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1674 120.0 -2.29 -1.18 0.851 46.6% -55 +78 +20 45.2% -0.48 35–45 (44%) 26–29 (47%) 98.8 +0.46 — 1662 120.0 -1.40 -0.31 0.907 47.8% -44 -80 +164 44.3% -0.45 9–18 (33%) 8–12 (40%) 96.4 -1.48

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.