H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC
Lourdes Domínguez Lino vs Laura Robson H2H: 2-1
Lourdes Domínguez Lino holds a 2–1 lead over Laura Robson in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on hard courts, while Lourdes Domínguez Lino leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Laura Robson won the 2013 US Open first round 7-5 6-0.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ESP
Age 45
Right-Handed
163 cm / 5'4"
H2H
2
–
1
3 main draw meetings
GBR
Age 32
Left-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 28, 2013* | US Open | Grand Slam | R128 | Hard | Laura Robson | 7-5 6-0 | Lourdes Domínguez Lino | Match data |
| Apr 11, 2013* | Katowice | WTA 250 | R32 | Clay | Lourdes Domínguez Lino | 5-7 7-6(7) 6-1 | Laura Robson | Match data |
| Oct 4, 2012* | Beijing | WTA 1000 | R32 | Hard | Lourdes Domínguez Lino | 7-5 6-3 | Laura Robson | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lourdes Domínguez Lino | #1,129 | #40 | 1,305 | 1,674 | 125 | 157 | 44.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 |
| Laura Robson | #764 | #27 | 1,685 | 1,708 | 38 | 62 | 38.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Lourdes Domínguez Lino | Laura Robson | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 14 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2008 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #517 | 1,489 | 0 | 0 |
| 15 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2009 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #403 | 1,483 | 0 | 0 |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2010 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #217 | 1,473 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2011 | 3–5 | 37.5% | #133 | 1,507 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2012 | 15–14 | 51.7% | #53 | 1,644 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 2000 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #141 | 1,489 | 0 | 0 | 2013 | 18–22 | 45.0% | #44 | 1,661 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2001 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #378 | 1,479 | 0 | 0 | 2014 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #916 | 1,629 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2002 | 4–3 | 57.1% | #390 | 1,518 | 0 | 0 | 2015 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #557 | 1,594 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2003 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #319 | 1,503 | 0 | 0 | 2016 | 1–8 | 11.1% | #222 | 1,512 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2004 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #208 | 1,508 | 0 | 0 | 2017 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #229 | 1,464 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2005 | 6–4 | 60.0% | #72 | 1,553 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | 2006 | 21–19 | 52.5% | #52 | 1,622 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | 2007 | 16–21 | 43.2% | #71 | 1,558 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 2008 | 6–11 | 35.3% | #91 | 1,521 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 2009 | 6–13 | 31.6% | #134 | 1,484 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 2010 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #85 | 1,493 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 2011 | 16–16 | 50.0% | #79 | 1,583 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 2012 | 16–16 | 50.0% | #48 | 1,653 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 2013 | 17–22 | 43.6% | #69 | 1,620 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 33 | 2014 | 7–11 | 38.9% | #110 | 1,570 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 34 | 2015 | 4–5 | 44.4% | #100 | 1,552 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 35 | 2016 | 3–8 | 27.3% | #220 | 1,517 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |