H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Lucie Hradecka vs Anna-Lena Groenefeld H2H: 0-1
Anna-Lena Groenefeld holds a 1–0 lead over Lucie Hradecka in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Anna-Lena Groenefeld leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Anna-Lena Groenefeld won the 2010 Monterrey third round 6-2 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
CZE
Age 41
Right-Handed
177 cm / 5'10"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
GER
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 4, 2010* | Monterrey | WTA 500 | R32 | Hard | Anna-Lena Groenefeld | 6-2 6-4 | Lucie Hradecka | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lucie Hradecka | #1,142 | #41 | 1,271 | 1,726 | 92 | 120 | 43.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Anna-Lena Groenefeld | #1,012 | #14 | 1,365 | 1,856 | 109 | 130 | 45.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Lucie Hradecka | Anna-Lena Groenefeld | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 2006 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #220 | 1,491 | 0 | 0 | 2003 | 3–6 | 33.3% | #118 | 1,515 | 0 | 0 |
| 2007 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #223 | 1,476 | 0 | 0 | 2004 | 7–15 | 31.8% | #68 | 1,478 | 0 | 0 |
| 2008 | 4–3 | 57.1% | #118 | 1,522 | 0 | 0 | 2005 | 36–26 | 58.1% | #21 | 1,786 | 0 | 0 |
| 2009 | 14–11 | 56.0% | #64 | 1,599 | 0 | 0 | 2006 | 30–26 | 53.6% | #19 | 1,656 | 0 | 1 |
| 2010 | 5–17 | 22.7% | #110 | 1,498 | 0 | 0 | 2007 | 4–14 | 22.2% | #204 | 1,527 | 0 | 1 |
| 2011 | 16–20 | 44.4% | #52 | 1,580 | 0 | 0 | 2008 | 7–7 | 50.0% | #76 | 1,596 | 0 | 1 |
| 2012 | 18–17 | 51.4% | #46 | 1,653 | 0 | 0 | 2009 | 18–23 | 43.9% | #65 | 1,655 | 0 | 1 |
| 2013 | 5–11 | 31.2% | #148 | 1,562 | 0 | 0 | 2010 | 4–11 | 26.7% | #166 | 1,563 | 0 | 1 |
| 2014 | 3–3 | 50.0% | #154 | 1,587 | 0 | 0 | 2011 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #266 | 1,542 | 0 | 1 |
| 2015 | 17–17 | 50.0% | #53 | 1,641 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2016 | 5–13 | 27.8% | #166 | 1,586 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2017 | 4–3 | 57.1% | #193 | 1,621 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2019 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #302 | 1,615 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2021 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #567 | 1,549 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |