H2H data updated: 2026-09-14 00:00 UTC

Lucie Hradecka vs Jana Cepelova H2H: 1-0

Lucie Hradecka holds a 1–0 lead over Jana Cepelova in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Lucie Hradecka leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Lucie Hradecka won the 2015 Indian Wells Open first round 6-3 6-1.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Lucie Hradecka
CZE Age 41 Right-Handed 177 cm / 5'10"
H2H
1 – 0
1 main-draw meetings
Jana Cepelova
Slovak Republic Age 33 Right-Handed 168 cm / 5'6"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Lucie Hradecka #122 6-3 6-1 Jana Cepelova #67 Match data Mar 13, 2015* R128 Indian Wells Open Premier Mandatory → modern equivalent WTA 1000 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Lucie Hradecka #1,142 #41 1,271 1,725 92 121 43.2% 0 0 0 0 0 0
Jana Cepelova #894 #50 1,074 1,671 55 92 37.4% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Lucie Hradecka Jana Cepelova
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
18 — — — — — — — 2011 0–1 0.0% #201 1,485 0 0
19 — — — — — — — 2012 5–5 50.0% #111 1,535 0 0
20 — — — — — — — 2013 7–14 33.3% #76 1,510 0 0
21 2006 1–2 33.3% #220 1,491 0 0 2014 18–19 48.6% #56 1,599 0 0
22 2007 0–1 0.0% #223 1,476 0 0 2015 5–10 33.3% #147 1,575 0 0
23 2008 4–3 57.1% #118 1,522 0 0 2016 9–12 42.9% #100 1,631 0 0
24 2009 14–11 56.0% #64 1,599 0 0 2017 8–21 27.6% #108 1,627 0 0
25 2010 5–17 22.7% #110 1,499 0 0 2018 2–5 28.6% #188 1,625 0 0
26 2011 16–20 44.4% #52 1,581 0 0 2019 1–5 16.7% #158 1,619 0 0
27 2012 18–17 51.4% #46 1,652 0 0 — — — — — — —
28 2013 5–11 31.2% #148 1,561 0 0 — — — — — — —
29 2014 3–3 50.0% #154 1,587 0 0 — — — — — — —
30 2015 17–17 50.0% #53 1,642 0 0 — — — — — — —
31 2016 5–14 26.3% #166 1,580 0 0 — — — — — — —
32 2017 4–3 57.1% #193 1,619 0 0 — — — — — — —
34 2019 0–1 0.0% #302 1,615 0 0 — — — — — — —
36 2021 0–1 0.0% #567 1,549 0 0 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Lucie Hradecka Jana Cepelova
Yr HardClayGrass Yr HardClayGrass
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2011 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2012 3 3 6 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 2 1 3 66.7%
20 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2013 4 9 13 30.8% 2 3 5 40.0% 1 2 3 33.3%
21 2006 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — 2014 10 12 22 45.5% 8 5 13 61.5% 0 2 2 0.0%
22 2007 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2015 1 6 7 14.3% 3 3 6 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
23 2008 — — — — 4 3 7 57.1% — — — — 2016 5 7 12 41.7% 2 4 6 33.3% 2 1 3 66.7%
24 2009 5 5 10 50.0% 9 5 14 64.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 2017 4 14 18 22.2% 3 4 7 42.9% 1 3 4 25.0%
25 2010 0 9 9 0.0% 5 7 12 41.7% 0 1 1 0.0% 2018 2 4 6 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
26 2011 9 14 23 39.1% 7 5 12 58.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 2019 0 3 3 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — —
27 2012 12 10 22 54.5% 6 6 12 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 2013 1 7 8 12.5% 4 3 7 57.1% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 2014 3 3 6 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 2015 6 8 14 42.9% 10 6 16 62.5% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 2016 3 9 12 25.0% 2 5 7 28.6% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 2017 3 2 5 60.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 2019 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
36 2021 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 42 70 112 37.5% 49 43 92 53.3% 1 8 9 11.1% — 29 59 88 33.0% 19 23 42 45.2% 7 10 17 41.2%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 193/209 of Lucie Hradecka's and 141/147 of Jana Cepelova's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Lucie Hradecka Jana Cepelova
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
18 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2011 1/1 2.0 5.0 86.4% 50.9% 11.1% 53.8% 25.0% 45.5% 40.4%
19 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2012 9/10 1.3 2.7 66.5% 58.4% 44.1% 49.8% 44.8% 53.6% 45.4%
20 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2013 21/21 1.0 2.7 64.1% 54.6% 39.5% 44.2% 52.4% 49.4% 42.5%
21 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2014 36/37 1.1 2.3 67.6% 56.9% 44.2% 52.4% 51.9% 53.1% 45.6%
22 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2015 12/15 0.4 2.6 69.0% 51.6% 43.2% 43.7% 42.8% 48.3% 40.4%
23 2008 5/7 4.4 6.2 51.8% 71.1% 42.3% 56.1% 51.6% 57.2% 44.6% 2016 21/21 1.0 3.5 64.5% 59.8% 43.9% 45.0% 50.4% 54.1% 43.3%
24 2009 24/25 4.7 5.7 53.4% 71.1% 49.0% 48.0% 44.0% 60.8% 42.9% 2017 28/29 1.0 2.9 62.6% 60.1% 38.9% 43.3% 43.7% 52.2% 42.9%
25 2010 22/22 4.8 6.0 50.2% 68.4% 45.5% 49.2% 38.3% 56.1% 38.8% 2018 7/7 1.3 2.4 64.5% 58.3% 43.6% 51.6% 51.1% 53.2% 42.9%
26 2011 35/36 6.7 4.6 52.3% 71.6% 44.4% 55.6% 47.7% 58.6% 41.1% 2019 6/6 0.5 2.3 62.5% 54.9% 37.2% 24.8% 54.2% 46.8% 44.3%
27 2012 35/35 6.5 4.9 53.4% 73.2% 46.3% 54.8% 44.6% 60.8% 38.8% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
28 2013 10/16 3.0 5.9 55.8% 65.2% 37.7% 52.7% 36.8% 52.7% 35.5% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
29 2014 6/6 7.7 6.3 52.3% 77.4% 42.9% 66.9% 37.6% 61.1% 41.0% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
30 2015 29/34 6.0 4.9 56.8% 71.5% 49.2% 49.7% 47.5% 61.6% 39.5% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
31 2016 18/19 4.4 5.5 49.6% 69.1% 44.0% 48.8% 38.7% 56.2% 39.4% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
32 2017 7/7 6.7 4.4 53.8% 73.2% 46.9% 48.6% 38.1% 61.0% 39.3% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
34 2019 1/1 5.0 8.0 54.2% 79.5% 36.4% 57.1% 40.0% 59.7% 33.3% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
36 2021 1/1 2.0 1.0 66.7% 63.9% 55.6% 60.0% 55.6% 61.1% 53.3% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
Career — 193/213 5.6 5.2 53.1% 71.1% 45.8% 52.2% 43.6% 59.1% 40.0% — 141/147 1.0 2.7 65.4% 57.2% 41.7% 46.2% 48.8% 51.8% 43.6%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Lucie Hradecka Jana Cepelova
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2011 1486 97.3 +0.56 -1.05 0.740 43.2% — — — 0.0% -3.50 — — — +0.07
19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2012 1535 104.0 +0.24 +0.88 0.978 49.6% -13 — +117 43.5% -0.39 3–0 (100%) 1–2 (33%) 103.5 +0.42
20 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2013 1511 109.4 -5.00 -1.81 0.840 45.9% -15 +25 +91 35.4% -1.19 3–3 (50%) 3–2 (60%) 102.3 +0.41
21 2006 1491 100.6 — — — — — — — 28.6% -0.86 1–0 1–1 — +0.06 2014 1599 124.4 -2.47 +1.17 0.972 49.3% -50 +49 — 48.8% -0.24 6–6 (50%) 6–2 (75%) 105.4 +0.63
22 2007 1476 94.8 — — — — — — — 0.0% -4.50 — — — +0.04 2015 1575 106.4 -3.91 -1.07 0.783 44.6% -70 +65 — 35.3% -1.18 4–2 (67%) 2–2 (50%) 102.6 -1.09
23 2008 1522 116.1 +0.28 -0.38 1.043 51.8% — +57 — 60.0% +1.27 0–1 0–1 — +0.18 2016 1632 123.6 -1.51 +0.12 0.945 48.8% -32 -37 -17 44.9% -0.35 3–4 (43%) 2–1 (67%) 101.0 -1.31
24 2009 1600 113.4 +2.94 -1.31 1.096 52.0% -63 +42 — 52.5% +0.25 6–5 (55%) 2–4 (33%) 101.1 +1.41 2017 1627 118.6 -2.44 -0.29 0.898 47.4% -28 -13 -11 32.8% -1.11 3–7 (30%) 4–4 (50%) 96.2 -1.67
25 2010 1499 111.9 -0.60 -4.41 0.885 47.5% -50 +122 — 31.9% -0.96 0–5 (0%) 2–3 (40%) 94.3 -0.10 2018 1626 119.0 -1.48 -0.41 0.915 48.0% +7 — — 38.9% -0.72 1–3 (25%) 1–1 — -0.49
26 2011 1581 128.7 +2.75 -1.69 0.993 49.9% -48 +51 — 50.0% -0.07 3–11 (21%) 3–5 (38%) 94.0 -0.58 2019 1619 111.1 -2.22 +0.48 0.832 45.4% +46 -54 — 27.3% -1.36 0–1 — — -0.45
27 2012 1653 123.3 +3.46 -3.66 0.991 49.7% -39 +6 — 51.3% -0.09 3–3 (50%) 10–5 (67%) 104.7 -0.15 2020 1567 95.3 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 2013 1562 108.1 -2.03 -4.06 0.752 44.2% -32 +96 — 36.1% -0.94 1–3 (25%) 1–3 (25%) 95.1 +0.39 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 2014 1587 119.5 +2.19 +0.06 1.055 51.1% -26 — — 53.3% +0.13 1–2 (33%) 2–2 (50%) 101.1 -0.33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 2015 1642 127.6 +3.16 -1.64 1.028 50.2% -66 +87 -139 46.3% -0.26 9–3 (75%) 2–4 (33%) 105.6 -2.33 2023 1546 — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 2016 1580 113.8 -0.39 -1.79 0.900 47.8% -16 +88 — 32.5% -0.90 1–3 (25%) 2–4 (33%) 97.3 -0.40 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 2017 1620 113.7 +2.37 -0.32 1.008 50.4% -16 — — 50.0% +0.38 2–0 1–0 — -0.49 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 2019 1616 101.7 +2.29 +2.10 0.828 46.8% — — — 0.0% -1.50 — 0–1 — +0.02 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 2020 1597 97.5 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
36 2021 1550 93.8 +0.91 +0.06 1.371 57.0% — — — 0.0% -3.00 — — — +0.01 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1726 122.6 +1.93 -2.27 0.977 49.5% -43 +67 -139 45.1% -0.27 27–36 (43%) 26–33 (44%) 99.1 -1.07 — 1671 120.4 -2.57 -0.05 0.905 47.7% -30 +17 +41 40.0% -0.75 23–26 (47%) 19–14 (58%) 104.7 -2.37

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.