H2H data updated: 2026-09-14 00:00 UTC

Lucie Hradecka vs Ksenia Pervak H2H: 2-1

Lucie Hradecka holds a 2–1 lead over Ksenia Pervak in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on hard courts, while Lucie Hradecka leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Ksenia Pervak won the 2011 Monterrey Open round of 16 6-2 6-7(4) 6-3.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Lucie Hradecka
CZE Age 41 Right-Handed 177 cm / 5'10"
H2H
2 – 1
3 main-draw meetings
Ksenia Pervak
RUS Age 35 Left-Handed 170 cm / 5'7"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Ksenia Pervak #88 6-2 6-7(4) 6-3 Lucie Hradecka #83 Match data Mar 4, 2011* R16 Monterrey Open International → modern equivalent WTA 250 Hard
Lucie Hradecka #102 6-4 6-3 Ksenia Pervak #94 Match data Feb 19, 2011* QF Memphis Classic International → modern equivalent WTA 250 Hard
Lucie Hradecka #56 6-3 6-2 Ksenia Pervak #160 Match data Jul 16, 2009* R32 Prague International → modern equivalent WTA 250 Clay

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Lucie Hradecka #1,142 #41 1,271 1,725 92 121 43.2% 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ksenia Pervak #834 #37 1,475 1,702 53 63 45.7% 0 0 0 0 1 1

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Lucie Hradecka Ksenia Pervak
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
18 — — — — — — — 2009 3–5 37.5% #129 1,516 0 0
19 — — — — — — — 2010 7–9 43.8% #97 1,540 0 0
20 — — — — — — — 2011 23–17 57.5% #39 1,669 0 1
21 2006 1–2 33.3% #220 1,491 0 0 2012 14–22 38.9% #103 1,587 0 1
22 2007 0–1 0.0% #223 1,476 0 0 2013 4–6 40.0% #125 1,595 0 1
23 2008 4–3 57.1% #118 1,522 0 0 2014 2–4 33.3% #151 1,583 0 1
24 2009 14–11 56.0% #64 1,599 0 0 — — — — — — —
25 2010 5–17 22.7% #110 1,499 0 0 — — — — — — —
26 2011 16–20 44.4% #52 1,581 0 0 — — — — — — —
27 2012 18–17 51.4% #46 1,652 0 0 — — — — — — —
28 2013 5–11 31.2% #148 1,561 0 0 — — — — — — —
29 2014 3–3 50.0% #154 1,587 0 0 — — — — — — —
30 2015 17–17 50.0% #53 1,642 0 0 — — — — — — —
31 2016 5–14 26.3% #166 1,580 0 0 — — — — — — —
32 2017 4–3 57.1% #193 1,619 0 0 — — — — — — —
34 2019 0–1 0.0% #302 1,615 0 0 — — — — — — —
36 2021 0–1 0.0% #567 1,549 0 0 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Lucie Hradecka Ksenia Pervak
Yr HardClayGrass Yr HardClayGrass
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2009 2 3 5 40.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2010 6 7 13 46.2% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — —
20 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2011 16 11 27 59.3% 4 5 9 44.4% 3 1 4 75.0%
21 2006 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — 2012 10 14 24 41.7% 4 6 10 40.0% 0 2 2 0.0%
22 2007 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2013 4 6 10 40.0% — — — — — — — —
23 2008 — — — — 4 3 7 57.1% — — — — 2014 2 3 5 40.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
24 2009 5 5 10 50.0% 9 5 14 64.3% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — —
25 2010 0 9 9 0.0% 5 7 12 41.7% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — —
26 2011 9 14 23 39.1% 7 5 12 58.3% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — —
27 2012 12 10 22 54.5% 6 6 12 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 2013 1 7 8 12.5% 4 3 7 57.1% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 2014 3 3 6 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 2015 6 8 14 42.9% 10 6 16 62.5% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 2016 3 9 12 25.0% 2 5 7 28.6% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 2017 3 2 5 60.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 2019 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
36 2021 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 42 70 112 37.5% 49 43 92 53.3% 1 8 9 11.1% — 40 44 84 47.6% 9 15 24 37.5% 4 4 8 50.0%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 193/209 of Lucie Hradecka's and 108/116 of Ksenia Pervak's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Lucie Hradecka Ksenia Pervak
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
18 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2009 7/8 0.7 5.1 63.2% 58.1% 43.6% 57.0% 48.4% 53.4% 41.5%
19 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2010 16/16 0.3 3.4 72.5% 57.9% 37.8% 48.6% 44.8% 53.1% 44.9%
20 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2011 36/40 0.7 3.6 65.0% 59.6% 45.6% 42.3% 47.4% 54.7% 46.2%
21 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2012 33/36 1.0 4.4 64.0% 59.8% 43.8% 48.2% 53.6% 54.1% 42.7%
22 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2013 10/10 0.8 5.3 65.5% 57.3% 37.5% 37.2% 43.2% 50.2% 44.9%
23 2008 5/7 4.4 6.2 51.8% 71.1% 42.3% 56.1% 51.6% 57.2% 44.6% 2014 6/6 0.8 6.8 59.7% 60.9% 48.5% 45.7% 67.1% 56.1% 39.4%
24 2009 24/25 4.7 5.7 53.4% 71.1% 49.0% 48.0% 44.0% 60.8% 42.9% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
25 2010 22/22 4.8 6.0 50.2% 68.4% 45.5% 49.2% 38.3% 56.1% 38.8% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
26 2011 35/36 6.7 4.6 52.3% 71.6% 44.4% 55.6% 47.7% 58.6% 41.1% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
27 2012 35/35 6.5 4.9 53.4% 73.2% 46.3% 54.8% 44.6% 60.8% 38.8% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
28 2013 10/16 3.0 5.9 55.8% 65.2% 37.7% 52.7% 36.8% 52.7% 35.5% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
29 2014 6/6 7.7 6.3 52.3% 77.4% 42.9% 66.9% 37.6% 61.1% 41.0% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
30 2015 29/34 6.0 4.9 56.8% 71.5% 49.2% 49.7% 47.5% 61.6% 39.5% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
31 2016 18/19 4.4 5.5 49.6% 69.1% 44.0% 48.8% 38.7% 56.2% 39.4% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
32 2017 7/7 6.7 4.4 53.8% 73.2% 46.9% 48.6% 38.1% 61.0% 39.3% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
34 2019 1/1 5.0 8.0 54.2% 79.5% 36.4% 57.1% 40.0% 59.7% 33.3% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
36 2021 1/1 2.0 1.0 66.7% 63.9% 55.6% 60.0% 55.6% 61.1% 53.3% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
Career — 193/213 5.6 5.2 53.1% 71.1% 45.8% 52.2% 43.6% 59.1% 40.0% — 108/116 0.7 4.3 65.4% 59.2% 43.2% 45.7% 49.7% 53.9% 44.1%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Lucie Hradecka Ksenia Pervak
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2009 1516 105.5 -0.12 +0.57 0.891 47.4% +19 — — 43.8% -1.00 1–1 1–0 — -0.22
19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2010 1541 116.0 -2.10 +0.93 0.958 49.0% +14 -11 — 48.6% -0.16 3–4 (43%) 1–0 — +0.79
20 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2011 1669 118.5 -0.14 +1.89 1.020 50.3% -10 -138 -7 56.2% +0.40 7–4 (64%) 4–3 (57%) 105.0 +2.50
21 2006 1491 100.6 — — — — — — — 28.6% -0.86 1–0 1–1 — +0.06 2012 1588 125.2 -1.50 -1.17 0.930 48.4% +34 -30 — 45.9% -0.45 4–6 (40%) 8–4 (67%) 102.1 -0.15
22 2007 1476 94.8 — — — — — — — 0.0% -4.50 — — — +0.04 2013 1595 123.3 -1.89 +0.41 0.903 47.6% +25 — — 40.0% -1.12 3–2 (60%) 2–1 (67%) — -0.47
23 2008 1522 116.1 +0.28 -0.38 1.043 51.8% — +57 — 60.0% +1.27 0–1 0–1 — +0.18 2014 1583 116.3 +1.31 -1.07 0.896 48.0% +19 — — 42.9% -0.57 0–2 2–0 — -0.31
24 2009 1600 113.4 +2.94 -1.31 1.096 52.0% -63 +42 — 52.5% +0.25 6–5 (55%) 2–4 (33%) 101.1 +1.41 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
25 2010 1499 111.9 -0.60 -4.41 0.885 47.5% -50 +122 — 31.9% -0.96 0–5 (0%) 2–3 (40%) 94.3 -0.10 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
26 2011 1581 128.7 +2.75 -1.69 0.993 49.9% -48 +51 — 50.0% -0.07 3–11 (21%) 3–5 (38%) 94.0 -0.58 2017 1565 98.5 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
27 2012 1653 123.3 +3.46 -3.66 0.991 49.7% -39 +6 — 51.3% -0.09 3–3 (50%) 10–5 (67%) 104.7 -0.15 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 2013 1562 108.1 -2.03 -4.06 0.752 44.2% -32 +96 — 36.1% -0.94 1–3 (25%) 1–3 (25%) 95.1 +0.39 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 2014 1587 119.5 +2.19 +0.06 1.055 51.1% -26 — — 53.3% +0.13 1–2 (33%) 2–2 (50%) 101.1 -0.33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 2015 1642 127.6 +3.16 -1.64 1.028 50.2% -66 +87 -139 46.3% -0.26 9–3 (75%) 2–4 (33%) 105.6 -2.33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 2016 1580 113.8 -0.39 -1.79 0.900 47.8% -16 +88 — 32.5% -0.90 1–3 (25%) 2–4 (33%) 97.3 -0.40 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 2017 1620 113.7 +2.37 -0.32 1.008 50.4% -16 — — 50.0% +0.38 2–0 1–0 — -0.49 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 2019 1616 101.7 +2.29 +2.10 0.828 46.8% — — — 0.0% -1.50 — 0–1 — +0.02 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 2020 1597 97.5 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
36 2021 1550 93.8 +0.91 +0.06 1.371 57.0% — — — 0.0% -3.00 — — — +0.01 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1726 122.6 +1.93 -2.27 0.977 49.5% -43 +67 -139 45.1% -0.27 27–36 (43%) 26–33 (44%) 99.1 -1.07 — 1702 124.3 -0.93 +0.43 0.957 49.0% +14 -72 -7 49.0% -0.22 18–19 (49%) 18–8 (69%) 106.5 +1.84

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.