H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Lucie Hradecka vs Ksenia Pervak H2H: 2-1
Lucie Hradecka holds a 2–1 lead over Ksenia Pervak in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on hard courts, while Lucie Hradecka leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Ksenia Pervak won the 2011 Monterrey fourth round 6-2 6-7(4) 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
CZE
Age 41
Right-Handed
177 cm / 5'10"
H2H
2
–
1
3 main draw meetings
RUS
Age 35
Left-Handed
170 cm / 5'7"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 4, 2011* | Monterrey | WTA 500 | R16 | Hard | Ksenia Pervak | 6-2 6-7(4) 6-3 | Lucie Hradecka | Match data |
| Feb 19, 2011* | Memphis | WTA 250 | QF | Hard | Lucie Hradecka | 6-4 6-3 | Ksenia Pervak | Match data |
| Jul 16, 2009* | Prague | WTA 250 | R32 | Clay | Lucie Hradecka | 6-3 6-2 | Ksenia Pervak | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lucie Hradecka | #1,142 | #41 | 1,271 | 1,726 | 92 | 120 | 43.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Ksenia Pervak | #834 | #37 | 1,475 | 1,703 | 53 | 63 | 45.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Lucie Hradecka | Ksenia Pervak | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2009 | 3–5 | 37.5% | #129 | 1,516 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2010 | 7–9 | 43.8% | #97 | 1,541 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2011 | 23–17 | 57.5% | #39 | 1,669 | 0 | 1 |
| 21 | 2006 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #220 | 1,491 | 0 | 0 | 2012 | 14–22 | 38.9% | #103 | 1,588 | 0 | 1 |
| 22 | 2007 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #223 | 1,476 | 0 | 0 | 2013 | 4–6 | 40.0% | #125 | 1,595 | 0 | 1 |
| 23 | 2008 | 4–3 | 57.1% | #118 | 1,522 | 0 | 0 | 2014 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #151 | 1,583 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | 2009 | 14–11 | 56.0% | #64 | 1,599 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | 2010 | 5–17 | 22.7% | #110 | 1,498 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | 2011 | 16–20 | 44.4% | #52 | 1,580 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 2012 | 18–17 | 51.4% | #46 | 1,653 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 2013 | 5–11 | 31.2% | #148 | 1,562 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 2014 | 3–3 | 50.0% | #154 | 1,587 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 2015 | 17–17 | 50.0% | #53 | 1,641 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 2016 | 5–13 | 27.8% | #166 | 1,586 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 2017 | 4–3 | 57.1% | #193 | 1,621 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 34 | 2019 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #302 | 1,615 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 36 | 2021 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #567 | 1,549 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |