H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Lucie Hradecka vs Stefanie Voegele H2H: 1-1
Lucie Hradecka and Stefanie Voegele are tied 1–1 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on clay. Most recently, Stefanie Voegele won the 2012 Charleston third round 6-4 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
CZE
Age 41
Right-Handed
177 cm / 5'10"
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
SUI
Age 36
Right-Handed
170 cm / 5'7"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 5, 2012* | Charleston | WTA 500 | R32 | Clay | Stefanie Voegele | 6-4 6-4 | Lucie Hradecka | Match data |
| Jul 15, 2010* | Prague | WTA 250 | R32 | Clay | Lucie Hradecka | 7-6(6) 6-2 | Stefanie Voegele | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lucie Hradecka | #1,142 | #41 | 1,271 | 1,726 | 92 | 120 | 43.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Stefanie Voegele | #1,075 | #42 | 1,255 | 1,712 | 100 | 175 | 36.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Lucie Hradecka | Stefanie Voegele | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2008 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #124 | 1,486 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2009 | 10–9 | 52.6% | #75 | 1,559 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2010 | 9–22 | 29.0% | #135 | 1,504 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2006 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #220 | 1,491 | 0 | 0 | 2011 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #138 | 1,517 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2007 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #223 | 1,476 | 0 | 0 | 2012 | 2–7 | 22.2% | #92 | 1,496 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2008 | 4–3 | 57.1% | #118 | 1,522 | 0 | 0 | 2013 | 21–20 | 51.2% | #50 | 1,665 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2009 | 14–11 | 56.0% | #64 | 1,599 | 0 | 0 | 2014 | 14–23 | 37.8% | #79 | 1,550 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2010 | 5–17 | 22.7% | #110 | 1,498 | 0 | 0 | 2015 | 7–17 | 29.2% | #119 | 1,513 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2011 | 16–20 | 44.4% | #52 | 1,580 | 0 | 0 | 2016 | 10–15 | 40.0% | #114 | 1,517 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2012 | 18–17 | 51.4% | #46 | 1,653 | 0 | 0 | 2017 | 5–4 | 55.6% | #169 | 1,650 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2013 | 5–11 | 31.2% | #148 | 1,562 | 0 | 0 | 2018 | 9–17 | 34.6% | #83 | 1,591 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 2014 | 3–3 | 50.0% | #154 | 1,587 | 0 | 0 | 2019 | 6–16 | 27.3% | #119 | 1,582 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | 2015 | 17–17 | 50.0% | #53 | 1,641 | 0 | 0 | 2020 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #116 | 1,597 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 | 2016 | 5–13 | 27.8% | #166 | 1,586 | 0 | 0 | 2021 | 4–12 | 25.0% | #147 | 1,536 | 0 | 0 |
| 32 | 2017 | 4–3 | 57.1% | #193 | 1,621 | 0 | 0 | 2022 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #260 | 1,499 | 0 | 0 |
| 34 | 2019 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #302 | 1,615 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 36 | 2021 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #567 | 1,549 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |