H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Lucie Safarova vs Aleksandra Wozniak H2H: 3-1
Lucie Safarova holds a 3–1 lead over Aleksandra Wozniak in their WTA head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Lucie Safarova leads 2–1 on hard courts and 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Lucie Safarova won the 2012 US Open second round 6-3 4-6 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
CZE
Age 39
Left-Handed
177 cm / 5'10"
H2H
3
–
1
4 main draw meetings
CAN
Age 38
Right-Handed
175 cm / 5'9"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 30, 2012* | US Open | Grand Slam | R64 | Hard | Lucie Safarova | 6-3 4-6 6-2 | Aleksandra Wozniak | Match data |
| Apr 6, 2012* | Charleston | WTA 500 | R16 | Clay | Lucie Safarova | 6-2 6-7(4) 6-1 | Aleksandra Wozniak | Match data |
| Jan 8, 2010* | Brisbane | WTA 500 | R16 | Hard | Lucie Safarova | 6-3 6-1 | Aleksandra Wozniak | Match data |
| Mar 11, 2009* | Indian Wells | WTA 1000 | R64 | Hard | Aleksandra Wozniak | 6-3 6-3 | Lucie Safarova | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lucie Safarova | #1,269 | #5 | 4,055 | 1,929 | 351 | 270 | 56.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 5 | 7 |
| Aleksandra Wozniak | #1,042 | #21 | 2,114 | 1,791 | 102 | 127 | 44.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Lucie Safarova | Aleksandra Wozniak | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2004 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #492 | 1,490 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2005 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #168 | 1,459 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 2005 | 15–9 | 62.5% | #47 | 1,665 | 0 | 2 | 2006 | 3–5 | 37.5% | #93 | 1,468 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 2006 | 21–21 | 50.0% | #42 | 1,625 | 0 | 3 | 2007 | 8–16 | 33.3% | #136 | 1,478 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2007 | 28–16 | 63.6% | #23 | 1,778 | 0 | 3 | 2008 | 19–15 | 55.9% | #34 | 1,676 | 0 | 1 |
| 21 | 2008 | 15–19 | 44.1% | #63 | 1,640 | 0 | 4 | 2009 | 30–25 | 54.5% | #34 | 1,765 | 0 | 1 |
| 22 | 2009 | 32–23 | 58.2% | #41 | 1,768 | 0 | 4 | 2010 | 11–18 | 37.9% | #125 | 1,602 | 0 | 1 |
| 23 | 2010 | 27–23 | 54.0% | #33 | 1,722 | 0 | 4 | 2011 | 4–7 | 36.4% | #107 | 1,582 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | 2011 | 34–23 | 59.6% | #25 | 1,797 | 0 | 4 | 2012 | 18–16 | 52.9% | #43 | 1,690 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | 2012 | 27–22 | 55.1% | #17 | 1,771 | 0 | 4 | 2013 | 2–7 | 22.2% | #288 | 1,631 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | 2013 | 26–22 | 54.2% | #29 | 1,797 | 0 | 5 | 2014 | 7–10 | 41.2% | #130 | 1,607 | 0 | 1 |
| 27 | 2014 | 36–23 | 61.0% | #16 | 1,858 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 2015 | 31–21 | 59.6% | #9 | 1,829 | 0 | 6 | 2016 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #301 | 1,541 | 0 | 1 |
| 29 | 2016 | 14–18 | 43.8% | #62 | 1,696 | 0 | 7 | 2017 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #300 | 1,514 | 0 | 1 |
| 30 | 2017 | 35–19 | 64.8% | #30 | 1,791 | 0 | 7 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 2018 | 10–11 | 47.6% | #105 | 1,754 | 0 | 7 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |