H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC

Lucie Safarova vs Ana Ivanovic H2H: 5-3

Lucie Safarova holds a 5–3 lead over Ana Ivanovic in their WTA head-to-head. Across 8 main-draw meetings, Lucie Safarova leads 3–2 on hard courts and 2–1 on clay. Most recently, Lucie Safarova won the 2015 Roland Garros semifinal 7-5 7-5.

CZE Age 39 Left-Handed 177 cm / 5'10"
H2H
5 3
8 main draw meetings
SRB Age 38 Right-Handed 184 cm / 6'0"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Jun 6, 2015* Roland Garros Grand Slam SF Clay Lucie Safarova #13 7-5 7-5 Ana Ivanovic #7 Match data
Sep 20, 2014* Tokyo WTA 500 QF Hard Ana Ivanovic #10 6-3 6-2 Lucie Safarova #15 Match data
Jun 1, 2014* Roland Garros Grand Slam R32 Clay Lucie Safarova #24 6-3 6-3 Ana Ivanovic #12 Match data
Jan 12, 2012* Sydney WTA 500 R32 Hard Lucie Safarova #25 7-6(5) 6-2 Ana Ivanovic #22 Match data
Sep 30, 2009* Tokyo WTA 1000 R64 Hard Lucie Safarova #43 6-4 7-6(1) Ana Ivanovic #11 Match data
Aug 20, 2009* Toronto WTA 1000 R32 Hard Lucie Safarova #46 3-6 7-5 6-3 Ana Ivanovic #11 Match data
May 28, 2008* Roland Garros Grand Slam R64 Clay Ana Ivanovic #2 6-1 6-2 Lucie Safarova #41 Match data
Aug 10, 2007* Los Angeles WTA 500 R16 Hard Ana Ivanovic #5 6-2 6-2 Lucie Safarova #24 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Lucie Safarova #1,269 #5 4,055 1,929 351 270 56.5% 0 0 0 2 5 7
Ana Ivanovic #63 #1 6,912 2,095 419 213 66.3% 1 3 2 7 2 15

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Lucie Safarova Ana Ivanovic
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 2004 3–4 42.9% #101 1,544 0 0
17 2005 32–14 69.6% #16 1,847 0 1
18 2005 15–9 62.5% #47 1,665 0 2 2006 36–18 66.7% #14 1,900 0 2
19 2006 21–21 50.0% #42 1,625 0 3 2007 49–17 74.2% #4 2,034 0 5
20 2007 28–16 63.6% #23 1,778 0 3 2008 38–16 70.4% #5 1,975 1 8
21 2008 15–19 44.1% #63 1,640 0 4 2009 22–14 61.1% #21 1,825 1 8
22 2009 32–23 58.2% #41 1,768 0 4 2010 33–18 64.7% #17 1,938 1 10
23 2010 27–23 54.0% #33 1,722 0 4 2011 32–20 61.5% #22 1,877 1 11
24 2011 34–23 59.6% #25 1,797 0 4 2012 33–18 64.7% #13 1,872 1 11
25 2012 27–22 55.1% #17 1,771 0 4 2013 38–23 62.3% #16 1,855 1 11
26 2013 26–22 54.2% #29 1,797 0 5 2014 59–18 76.6% #5 2,019 1 15
27 2014 36–23 61.0% #16 1,858 0 5 2015 29–19 60.4% #16 1,857 1 15
28 2015 31–21 59.6% #9 1,829 0 6 2016 15–14 51.7% #63 1,702 1 15
29 2016 14–18 43.8% #62 1,696 0 7
30 2017 35–19 64.8% #30 1,791 0 7
31 2018 10–11 47.6% #105 1,754 0 7