H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 17:48 UTC

Lucie Safarova vs Andrea Petkovic H2H: 3-5

Andrea Petkovic holds a 5–3 lead over Lucie Safarova in their WTA head-to-head. Across 8 main-draw meetings, Andrea Petkovic leads 4–3 on hard courts and 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Andrea Petkovic won the 2016 Cincinnati second round 6-4 6-7(4) 6-2.

CZE Age 39 Left-Handed 177 cm / 5'10"
H2H
3 5
8 main draw meetings
GER Age 38 Right-Handed 180 cm / 5'11"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Aug 17, 2016* Cincinnati WTA 1000 R64 Hard Andrea Petkovic #42 6-4 6-7(4) 6-2 Lucie Safarova #28 Match data
Feb 28, 2015* Doha WTA 500 QF Hard Lucie Safarova #15 6-2 6-1 Andrea Petkovic #10 Match data
Apr 5, 2014* Charleston WTA 500 QF Clay Andrea Petkovic #40 6-3 1-6 6-1 Lucie Safarova #26 Match data
Oct 4, 2013* Beijing WTA 1000 R16 Hard Lucie Safarova #34 6-4 6-7(4) 7-6(2) Andrea Petkovic #43 Match data
Oct 5, 2011* Beijing WTA 1000 R64 Hard Andrea Petkovic #11 7-6(5) 6-4 Lucie Safarova #28 Match data
Mar 9, 2011* Indian Wells WTA 1000 R64 Hard Andrea Petkovic #23 7-6(8) 7-5 Lucie Safarova #32 Match data
Oct 6, 2010* Beijing WTA 1000 R64 Hard Andrea Petkovic #35 6-2 6-3 Lucie Safarova #30 Match data
Aug 30, 2007* US Open Grand Slam R64 Hard Lucie Safarova #23 6-3 6-3 Andrea Petkovic #102 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Lucie Safarova #1,269 #5 4,055 1,929 351 270 56.5% 0 0 0 2 5 7
Andrea Petkovic #139 #9 4,640 1,990 273 225 54.8% 0 0 1 3 3 7

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Lucie Safarova Andrea Petkovic
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
18 2005 15–9 62.5% #47 1,665 0 2 2006 0–1 0.0% #242 1,497 0 0
19 2006 21–21 50.0% #42 1,625 0 3 2007 2–4 33.3% #93 1,502 0 0
20 2007 28–16 63.6% #23 1,778 0 3 2008 0–1 0.0% #378 1,500 0 0
21 2008 15–19 44.1% #63 1,640 0 4 2009 11–8 57.9% #55 1,613 0 1
22 2009 32–23 58.2% #41 1,768 0 4 2010 33–24 57.9% #32 1,796 0 1
23 2010 27–23 54.0% #33 1,722 0 4 2011 50–17 74.6% #10 1,975 0 2
24 2011 34–23 59.6% #25 1,797 0 4 2012 9–9 50.0% #125 1,857 0 2
25 2012 27–22 55.1% #17 1,771 0 4 2013 19–14 57.6% #43 1,798 0 2
26 2013 26–22 54.2% #29 1,797 0 5 2014 39–22 63.9% #13 1,826 0 5
27 2014 36–23 61.0% #16 1,858 0 5 2015 29–25 53.7% #24 1,685 0 6
28 2015 31–21 59.6% #9 1,829 0 6 2016 19–19 50.0% #55 1,702 0 6
29 2016 14–18 43.8% #62 1,696 0 7 2017 9–20 31.0% #99 1,631 0 6
30 2017 35–19 64.8% #30 1,791 0 7 2018 13–13 50.0% #64 1,700 0 6
31 2018 10–11 47.6% #105 1,754 0 7 2019 16–19 45.7% #78 1,712 0 6
32 2020 0–1 0.0% #102 1,697 0 6
33 2021 16–16 50.0% #75 1,730 0 7
34 2022 8–12 40.0% #139 1,707 0 7