H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Lucie Safarova vs Anna-Lena Groenefeld H2H: 2-1
Lucie Safarova holds a 2–1 lead over Anna-Lena Groenefeld in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Anna-Lena Groenefeld leads 1–0 on clay, while Lucie Safarova leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Lucie Safarova won the 2010 Brisbane third round 6-7(5) 6-4 6-1.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
CZE
Age 39
Left-Handed
177 cm / 5'10"
H2H
2
–
1
3 main draw meetings
GER
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 7, 2010* | Brisbane | WTA 500 | R32 | Hard | Lucie Safarova | 6-7(5) 6-4 6-1 | Anna-Lena Groenefeld | Match data |
| Jul 11, 2008* | Budapest | WTA 500 | R16 | Clay | Anna-Lena Groenefeld | 6-1 6-4 | Lucie Safarova | Match data |
| Jun 21, 2007* | Eastbourne | WTA 500 | R32 | Grass | Lucie Safarova | 7-6(0) 7-6(5) | Anna-Lena Groenefeld | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lucie Safarova | #1,269 | #5 | 4,055 | 1,929 | 351 | 270 | 56.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 5 | 7 |
| Anna-Lena Groenefeld | #1,012 | #14 | 1,365 | 1,856 | 109 | 130 | 45.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Lucie Safarova | Anna-Lena Groenefeld | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 2005 | 15–9 | 62.5% | #47 | 1,665 | 0 | 2 | 2003 | 3–6 | 33.3% | #118 | 1,515 | 0 | 0 |
| 2006 | 21–21 | 50.0% | #42 | 1,625 | 0 | 3 | 2004 | 7–15 | 31.8% | #68 | 1,478 | 0 | 0 |
| 2007 | 28–16 | 63.6% | #23 | 1,778 | 0 | 3 | 2005 | 36–26 | 58.1% | #21 | 1,786 | 0 | 0 |
| 2008 | 15–19 | 44.1% | #63 | 1,640 | 0 | 4 | 2006 | 30–26 | 53.6% | #19 | 1,656 | 0 | 1 |
| 2009 | 32–23 | 58.2% | #41 | 1,768 | 0 | 4 | 2007 | 4–14 | 22.2% | #204 | 1,527 | 0 | 1 |
| 2010 | 27–23 | 54.0% | #33 | 1,722 | 0 | 4 | 2008 | 7–7 | 50.0% | #76 | 1,596 | 0 | 1 |
| 2011 | 34–23 | 59.6% | #25 | 1,797 | 0 | 4 | 2009 | 18–23 | 43.9% | #65 | 1,655 | 0 | 1 |
| 2012 | 27–22 | 55.1% | #17 | 1,771 | 0 | 4 | 2010 | 4–11 | 26.7% | #166 | 1,563 | 0 | 1 |
| 2013 | 26–22 | 54.2% | #29 | 1,797 | 0 | 5 | 2011 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #266 | 1,542 | 0 | 1 |
| 2014 | 36–23 | 61.0% | #16 | 1,858 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2015 | 31–21 | 59.6% | #9 | 1,829 | 0 | 6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2016 | 14–18 | 43.8% | #62 | 1,696 | 0 | 7 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2017 | 35–19 | 64.8% | #30 | 1,791 | 0 | 7 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2018 | 10–11 | 47.6% | #105 | 1,754 | 0 | 7 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |