H2H data updated: 2026-09-14 00:00 UTC

Lucie Safarova vs Kveta Peschke H2H: 1-0

Lucie Safarova holds a 1–0 lead over Kveta Peschke in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Lucie Safarova leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Lucie Safarova won the 2006 Italian Open round of 64 7-6(1) 6-4.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Lucie Safarova
Czech Republic Age 39 Left-Handed 177 cm / 5'10"
H2H
1 – 0
1 main-draw meetings
Kveta Peschke
CZE Age 51 Right-Handed 165 cm / 5'5"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Lucie Safarova #31 7-6(1) 6-4 Kveta Peschke #42 Match data May 17, 2006* R64 Italian Open Tier I → modern equivalent WTA 1000 Clay

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Lucie Safarova #1,269 #5 4,055 1,930 354 273 56.5% 0 0 0 1 6 7
Kveta Peschke #264 #26 1,028 1,806 92 116 44.2% 0 0 0 0 1 1

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Lucie Safarova Kveta Peschke
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 — — — — — — — 1993 1–2 33.3% #237 1,510 0 0
18 2005 15–9 62.5% #47 1,664 0 2 1994 0–1 0.0% #222 1,507 0 0
19 2006 21–21 50.0% #42 1,625 0 3 — — — — — — —
20 2007 28–16 63.6% #23 1,779 0 3 — — — — — — —
21 2008 17–20 45.9% #63 1,652 0 4 — — — — — — —
22 2009 32–23 58.2% #41 1,772 0 4 1998 10–11 47.6% #60 1,568 0 1
23 2010 27–23 54.0% #33 1,742 0 4 1999 13–18 41.9% #44 1,703 0 1
24 2011 34–23 59.6% #25 1,799 0 4 2000 18–16 52.9% #47 1,790 0 1
25 2012 27–23 54.0% #17 1,749 0 4 2001 13–16 44.8% #85 1,710 0 1
26 2013 26–22 54.2% #29 1,792 0 5 2002 5–9 35.7% #148 1,673 0 1
27 2014 36–23 61.0% #16 1,860 0 5 — — — — — — —
28 2015 31–21 59.6% #9 1,831 0 6 2004 3–3 50.0% #93 1,675 0 1
29 2016 15–19 44.1% #62 1,698 0 7 2005 21–19 52.5% #30 1,769 0 1
30 2017 35–19 64.8% #30 1,797 0 7 2006 7–20 25.9% #133 1,594 0 1
31 2018 10–11 47.6% #105 1,758 0 7 2007 1–1 50.0% #264 1,600 0 1

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Lucie Safarova Kveta Peschke
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1993 — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
18 2005 6 5 11 54.5% 5 2 7 71.4% 4 2 6 66.7% — — — — 1994 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
19 2006 11 14 25 44.0% 10 6 16 62.5% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 2007 13 10 23 56.5% 8 3 11 72.7% 3 2 5 60.0% 4 1 5 80.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
21 2008 11 11 22 50.0% 6 8 14 42.9% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
22 2009 26 16 42 61.9% 6 6 12 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 1998 1 4 5 20.0% 9 4 13 69.2% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
23 2010 8 13 21 38.1% 14 7 21 66.7% 1 2 3 33.3% 4 1 5 80.0% 1999 5 8 13 38.5% 4 5 9 44.4% 0 2 2 0.0% 4 3 7 57.1%
24 2011 28 15 43 65.1% 5 5 10 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 2000 6 7 13 46.2% 7 5 12 58.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 5 3 8 62.5%
25 2012 18 15 33 54.5% 7 4 11 63.6% 2 3 5 40.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 2001 9 8 17 52.9% 2 5 7 28.6% — — — — 2 3 5 40.0%
26 2013 15 13 28 53.6% 6 6 12 50.0% 3 2 5 60.0% 2 1 3 66.7% 2002 2 5 7 28.6% 0 1 1 0.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
27 2014 22 15 37 59.5% 9 5 14 64.3% 5 3 8 62.5% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 2015 17 14 31 54.8% 11 5 16 68.8% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — 2004 2 1 3 66.7% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — —
29 2016 3 11 14 21.4% 9 5 14 64.3% 3 3 6 50.0% — — — — 2005 12 13 25 48.0% 5 3 8 62.5% 3 2 5 60.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
30 2017 25 11 36 69.4% 3 5 8 37.5% 7 3 10 70.0% — — — — 2006 4 11 15 26.7% 1 5 6 16.7% 2 2 4 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0%
31 2018 4 7 11 36.4% 2 2 4 50.0% 4 2 6 66.7% — — — — 2007 — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — —
Career — 207 170 377 54.9% 101 69 170 59.4% 36 28 64 56.2% 10 6 16 62.5% — 41 57 98 41.8% 31 33 64 48.4% 7 11 18 38.9% 13 15 28 46.4%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 526/627 of Lucie Safarova's and 34/75 of Kveta Peschke's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Lucie Safarova Kveta Peschke
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
18 2005 3/24 3.3 6.3 61.3% 63.5% 37.8% 57.1% 34.5% 54.2% 33.3% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
19 2006 22/42 4.4 4.3 59.5% 63.3% 47.8% 57.9% 34.3% 57.0% 39.7% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
20 2007 42/44 4.2 4.2 60.1% 71.1% 46.9% 56.3% 47.7% 61.6% 42.7% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
21 2008 23/37 3.3 5.7 60.1% 66.6% 41.4% 55.8% 37.6% 56.4% 40.7% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
22 2009 50/55 3.5 3.6 61.3% 70.3% 50.0% 54.0% 48.5% 62.4% 42.0% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
23 2010 49/50 3.8 3.8 64.8% 67.9% 42.6% 53.4% 44.5% 58.9% 40.0% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
24 2011 49/57 4.4 4.5 60.0% 71.2% 49.2% 61.0% 49.1% 62.1% 39.7% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
25 2012 43/50 3.4 4.1 62.6% 67.6% 49.4% 64.0% 44.8% 60.5% 40.9% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
26 2013 37/48 3.2 4.1 62.7% 66.7% 46.4% 51.8% 43.1% 59.1% 40.7% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
27 2014 58/59 4.6 4.0 62.9% 70.3% 48.6% 61.4% 45.7% 62.3% 41.7% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
28 2015 47/52 5.4 3.6 64.5% 72.2% 55.2% 59.9% 43.2% 66.2% 41.1% 2004 2/6 2.0 1.5 63.2% 61.3% 52.4% 33.9% 32.2% 58.1% 45.8%
29 2016 29/34 4.8 3.9 62.8% 72.1% 47.2% 54.8% 40.2% 62.5% 39.9% 2005 8/40 0.9 4.8 56.4% 67.1% 38.3% 66.7% 44.7% 54.3% 50.0%
30 2017 53/54 6.1 3.9 61.7% 71.2% 47.6% 59.4% 46.6% 62.4% 42.8% 2006 22/27 0.9 3.6 60.2% 56.2% 39.8% 45.2% 36.4% 49.5% 41.6%
31 2018 21/21 3.7 3.7 64.1% 68.1% 49.9% 54.0% 42.6% 61.7% 39.4% 2007 2/2 0.5 3.5 74.4% 52.8% 40.9% 51.9% 76.7% 49.8% 45.6%
Career — 526/627 4.3 4.1 62.2% 69.5% 48.1% 57.6% 44.6% 61.4% 41.0% — 34/208 0.9 3.8 60.3% 58.9% 40.2% 50.0% 40.5% 51.1% 44.0%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Lucie Safarova Kveta Peschke
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1993 1510 110.8 — — — — — — — 42.9% -0.14 0–1 — — -0.41
18 2005 1664 122.6 -0.20 -3.35 0.726 43.4% -80 -54 -11 58.3% +0.52 7–5 (58%) 3–3 (50%) 103.2 -0.78 1994 1508 108.8 — — — — — — — 0.0% -2.50 — 0–1 — -0.17
19 2006 1625 126.1 +0.16 -2.92 0.922 48.5% -75 +74 — 47.4% -0.12 8–5 (62%) 5–5 (50%) 102.2 -1.14 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 2007 1779 146.9 +4.80 -0.13 1.112 51.9% -65 +16 -63 62.4% +0.75 6–9 (40%) 7–8 (47%) 96.2 -1.99 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
21 2008 1653 117.3 +0.42 -2.52 0.932 48.4% +26 +9 — 45.5% -0.10 6–3 (67%) 2–4 (33%) 100.0 +1.17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
22 2009 1772 143.9 +5.70 -1.16 1.115 51.8% +20 -73 — 58.5% +0.50 5–12 (29%) 9–7 (56%) 97.7 -0.32 1998 1568 122.5 — — — — -52 +106 — 48.1% -0.17 5–5 (50%) 1–3 (25%) 100.6 +0.78
23 2010 1742 141.4 +3.21 -2.15 0.974 49.4% -24 +77 -109 53.1% +0.25 13–8 (62%) 6–9 (40%) 100.0 -2.46 1999 1704 141.0 — — — — -52 -7 — 42.9% -0.50 6–4 (60%) 3–1 (75%) 107.3 -0.83
24 2011 1799 143.2 +5.52 -2.69 1.049 50.8% +15 -4 -201 54.2% +0.32 20–10 (67%) 7–11 (39%) 102.4 -0.94 2000 1791 137.4 — — — — -59 -53 — 49.4% -0.48 8–3 (73%) 4–3 (57%) 107.0 -2.20
25 2012 1749 143.1 +4.49 -1.12 1.036 50.7% 0 +128 -149 49.5% +0.03 6–5 (55%) 9–6 (60%) 101.5 +0.27 2001 1711 130.0 — — — — +7 -42 — 45.7% -0.29 6–6 (50%) 2–6 (25%) 96.6 -1.12
26 2013 1793 131.9 +3.17 -1.51 0.995 49.7% -13 +15 -193 55.2% +0.13 8–12 (40%) 11–6 (65%) 98.2 +0.73 2002 1674 121.8 — — — — +8 — -162 39.4% -0.39 2–5 (29%) — — -1.13
27 2014 1860 152.7 +5.54 -0.04 1.107 51.8% -25 -11 -144 58.6% +0.66 14–13 (52%) 9–13 (41%) 99.4 -2.02 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 2015 1831 150.7 +6.98 +0.95 1.214 53.0% -25 +69 -92 59.2% +0.63 7–11 (39%) 14–18 (44%) 93.5 -0.85 2004 1675 115.7 +1.25 +0.61 1.094 51.2% +20 -45 — 50.0% +0.36 1–1 1–1 — -0.08
29 2016 1699 127.4 +3.91 -1.84 1.063 50.8% -25 +208 +26 47.2% -0.12 5–6 (45%) 7–5 (58%) 100.1 +0.56 2005 1770 145.7 +0.02 +2.42 1.095 52.3% -32 -63 -203 54.8% +0.31 4–9 (31%) 6–3 (67%) 97.6 -2.24
30 2017 1797 139.6 +4.59 -0.45 1.139 52.5% +18 +47 0 62.4% +0.96 13–8 (62%) 10–11 (48%) 100.1 +0.88 2006 1595 110.3 -4.62 -1.44 0.822 45.7% -4 +15 +34 35.1% -1.07 1–6 (14%) 1–4 (20%) 91.9 +1.43
31 2018 1758 134.2 +2.91 -1.66 1.027 50.2% +1 +52 +77 52.0% +0.08 2–6 (25%) 1–4 (20%) 90.8 -1.01 2007 1601 103.8 -0.67 +2.50 0.908 47.7% — — — 40.0% -0.80 1–0 — — 0.00
37 2024 1732 98.6 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1931 145.7 +4.38 -1.15 1.062 51.0% -13 +46 -65 55.2% +0.37 120–113 (52%) 100–110 (48%) 97.0 -1.27 — 1806 139.1 -2.95 -0.18 0.901 47.7% -26 -3 -117 46.1% -0.32 34–40 (46%) 18–22 (45%) 98.4 -2.90

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.