H2H data updated: 2026-07-25 23:01 UTC
Lucie Safarova vs Maret Ani H2H: 1-0
Lucie Safarova holds a 1–0 lead over Maret Ani in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Lucie Safarova leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Lucie Safarova won the 2008 Beijing Olympics second round 6-4 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
CZE
Age 39
Left-Handed
177 cm / 5'10"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
EST
Age 44
Right-Handed
175 cm / 5'9"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 12, 2008* | Beijing Olympics | Olympics | R64 | Hard | Lucie Safarova | 6-4 6-2 | Maret Ani | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lucie Safarova | #1,269 | #5 | 4,055 | 1,931 | 354 | 273 | 56.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 5 | 7 |
| Maret Ani | #988 | #63 | 688 | 1,617 | 22 | 42 | 34.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Lucie Safarova | Maret Ani | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | 2005 | 15–9 | 62.5% | #47 | 1,664 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 2006 | 21–21 | 50.0% | #42 | 1,625 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 2007 | 28–16 | 63.6% | #23 | 1,779 | 0 | 3 | 2002 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #183 | 1,496 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2008 | 17–20 | 45.9% | #63 | 1,652 | 0 | 4 | 2003 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #133 | 1,504 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2009 | 32–23 | 58.2% | #41 | 1,772 | 0 | 4 | 2004 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #183 | 1,493 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2010 | 27–23 | 54.0% | #33 | 1,741 | 0 | 4 | 2005 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #84 | 1,516 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2011 | 34–23 | 59.6% | #25 | 1,798 | 0 | 4 | 2006 | 9–16 | 36.0% | #150 | 1,524 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2012 | 27–23 | 54.0% | #17 | 1,749 | 0 | 4 | 2007 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #99 | 1,520 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2013 | 26–22 | 54.2% | #29 | 1,792 | 0 | 5 | 2008 | 4–10 | 28.6% | #119 | 1,462 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2014 | 36–23 | 61.0% | #16 | 1,859 | 0 | 5 | 2009 | 4–8 | 33.3% | #164 | 1,452 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2015 | 31–21 | 59.6% | #9 | 1,831 | 0 | 6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 2016 | 15–19 | 44.1% | #62 | 1,698 | 0 | 7 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 2017 | 35–19 | 64.8% | #30 | 1,798 | 0 | 7 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 2018 | 10–11 | 47.6% | #105 | 1,759 | 0 | 7 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |