H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC

Lucie Safarova vs Nadia Petrova H2H: 1-5

Nadia Petrova holds a 5–1 lead over Lucie Safarova in their WTA head-to-head. Across 6 main-draw meetings, Nadia Petrova leads 2–1 on clay and 2–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Nadia Petrova won the 2012 US Open third round 6-4 7-5.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Lucie Safarova
CZE Age 39 Left-Handed 177 cm / 5'10"
H2H
1 – 5
6 main draw meetings
Nadia Petrova
RUS Age 44 Right-Handed 178 cm / 5'10"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Sep 2, 2012* US Open Grand Slam R32 Hard Nadia Petrova #22 6-4 7-5 Lucie Safarova #17 Match data
Aug 18, 2010* Montreal WTA 1000 R64 Hard Nadia Petrova #21 7-5 4-6 6-3 Lucie Safarova #25 Match data
May 15, 2010* Madrid WTA 1000 QF Clay Lucie Safarova #30 6-1 1-6 6-4 Nadia Petrova #18 Match data
Feb 11, 2007* Paris WTA 500 F Carpet Nadia Petrova #7 4-6 6-1 6-4 Lucie Safarova #32 Match data
Apr 14, 2006* Charleston WTA 1000 R16 Clay Nadia Petrova #7 6-1 6-3 Lucie Safarova #27 Match data
Apr 8, 2006* Amelia Island WTA 500 SF Clay Nadia Petrova #7 6-3 6-2 Lucie Safarova #34 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Lucie Safarova #1,269 #5 4,055 1,929 351 270 56.5% 0 0 0 2 5 7
Nadia Petrova #578 #3 3,882 2,077 441 276 61.5% 0 3 1 7 2 13

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Lucie Safarova Nadia Petrova
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 — — — — — — — 1998 2–2 50.0% #145 1,536 0 0
17 — — — — — — — 1999 3–5 37.5% #93 1,568 0 0
18 2005 15–9 62.5% #47 1,665 0 2 2000 12–15 44.4% #60 1,624 0 0
19 2006 21–21 50.0% #42 1,625 0 3 2001 20–21 48.8% #39 1,682 0 0
20 2007 28–16 63.6% #23 1,778 0 3 2002 7–5 58.3% #112 1,758 0 0
21 2008 15–19 44.1% #63 1,640 0 4 2003 36–20 64.3% #12 1,924 0 0
22 2009 32–23 58.2% #41 1,768 0 4 2004 39–24 61.9% #12 1,880 0 0
23 2010 27–23 54.0% #33 1,722 0 4 2005 56–25 69.1% #9 1,945 0 1
24 2011 34–23 59.6% #25 1,797 0 4 2006 48–19 71.6% #6 1,990 0 6
25 2012 27–22 55.1% #17 1,771 0 4 2007 37–18 67.3% #14 1,931 0 7
26 2013 26–22 54.2% #29 1,797 0 5 2008 47–24 66.2% #11 1,923 0 9
27 2014 36–23 61.0% #16 1,858 0 5 2009 30–21 58.8% #20 1,821 0 9
28 2015 31–21 59.6% #9 1,829 0 6 2010 32–20 61.5% #15 1,828 0 9
29 2016 14–18 43.8% #62 1,696 0 7 2011 25–21 54.3% #29 1,781 0 10
30 2017 35–19 64.8% #30 1,791 0 7 2012 37–18 67.3% #12 1,917 0 13
31 2018 10–11 47.6% #105 1,754 0 7 2013 9–13 40.9% #104 1,718 0 13
32 — — — — — — — 2014 1–5 16.7% #362 1,648 0 13