H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 16:30 UTC

Lucie Safarova vs Petra Kvitova H2H: 0-10

Petra Kvitova holds a 10–0 lead over Lucie Safarova in their WTA head-to-head. Across 10 main-draw meetings, Petra Kvitova leads 5–0 on hard courts and 4–0 on grass. Most recently, Petra Kvitova won the 2017 Birmingham semifinal 6-1 1-0 RET.

CZE Age 39 Left-Handed 177 cm / 5'10"
H2H
0 10
10 main draw meetings
CZE Age 36 Left-Handed 182 cm / 6'0"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Jun 24, 2017* Birmingham WTA 250 SF Grass Petra Kvitova #16 6-1 1-0 (ret.) Lucie Safarova #41 Match data
Jun 16, 2016* Birmingham WTA 250 R32 Grass Petra Kvitova #11 6-3 6-2 Lucie Safarova #28 Match data
Oct 25, 2015 WTA Finals WTA Finals RR Hard Petra Kvitova #5 7-5 7-5 Lucie Safarova #9 Match data
Aug 30, 2015* New Haven WTA 500 F Hard Petra Kvitova #5 6-7(6) 6-2 6-2 Lucie Safarova #6 Match data
Jul 6, 2014* Wimbledon Grand Slam SF Grass Petra Kvitova #6 7-6(6) 6-1 Lucie Safarova #23 Match data
Jun 19, 2014* Eastbourne WTA 500 R32 Grass Petra Kvitova #6 6-1 5-7 7-6(4) Lucie Safarova #23 Match data
May 9, 2014* Madrid WTA 1000 R16 Clay Petra Kvitova #6 6-4 6-3 Lucie Safarova #25 Match data
Feb 14, 2014* Doha WTA 1000 R16 Hard Petra Kvitova #6 7-6(2) 5-7 6-2 Lucie Safarova #28 Match data
Jan 11, 2014* Sydney WTA 500 QF Hard Petra Kvitova #6 7-6(4) 6-2 Lucie Safarova #27 Match data
Aug 25, 2012* New Haven WTA 500 QF Hard Petra Kvitova #5 6-3 6-3 Lucie Safarova #17 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Lucie Safarova #1,269 #5 4,055 1,929 351 270 56.5% 0 0 0 2 5 7
Petra Kvitova #450 #2 7,690 2,073 501 258 66.0% 2 10 2 14 3 31

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Lucie Safarova Petra Kvitova
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 2007 0–1 0.0% #150 1,485 0 0
18 2005 15–9 62.5% #47 1,665 0 2 2008 13–14 48.1% #50 1,607 0 0
19 2006 21–21 50.0% #42 1,625 0 3 2009 18–16 52.9% #61 1,700 0 1
20 2007 28–16 63.6% #23 1,778 0 3 2010 17–20 45.9% #34 1,699 0 1
21 2008 15–19 44.1% #63 1,640 0 4 2011 50–11 82.0% #2 2,058 1 7
22 2009 32–23 58.2% #41 1,768 0 4 2012 38–15 71.7% #8 1,961 1 9
23 2010 27–23 54.0% #33 1,722 0 4 2013 49–22 69.0% #6 1,966 1 11
24 2011 34–23 59.6% #25 1,797 0 4 2014 41–17 70.7% #4 1,989 2 14
25 2012 27–22 55.1% #17 1,771 0 4 2015 35–16 68.6% #6 1,907 2 17
26 2013 26–22 54.2% #29 1,797 0 5 2016 41–19 68.3% #11 1,966 2 19
27 2014 36–23 61.0% #16 1,858 0 5 2017 18–10 64.3% #29 1,894 2 20
28 2015 31–21 59.6% #9 1,829 0 6 2018 42–17 71.2% #7 1,887 2 25
29 2016 14–18 43.8% #62 1,696 0 7 2019 33–16 67.3% #7 1,897 2 27
30 2017 35–19 64.8% #30 1,791 0 7 2020 20–7 74.1% #8 1,947 2 27
31 2018 10–11 47.6% #105 1,754 0 7 2021 28–17 62.2% #17 1,881 2 28
32 2022 28–19 59.6% #16 1,920 2 29
33 2023 29–13 69.0% #14 1,931 2 31
35 2025 1–8 11.1% 1,773 2 31