H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC

Lucie Safarova vs Roberta Vinci H2H: 3-2

Lucie Safarova holds a 3–2 lead over Roberta Vinci in their WTA head-to-head. Across 5 main-draw meetings, Lucie Safarova leads 2–1 on hard courts, while they are tied 1–1 on clay. Most recently, Lucie Safarova won the 2015 Madrid fourth round 6-4 6-7(6) 6-0.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Lucie Safarova
CZE Age 39 Left-Handed 177 cm / 5'10"
H2H
3 – 2
5 main draw meetings
Roberta Vinci
ITA Age 43 Right-Handed 163 cm / 5'4"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
May 8, 2015* Madrid WTA 1000 R16 Clay Lucie Safarova #14 6-4 6-7(6) 6-0 Roberta Vinci #46 Match data
Sep 26, 2013* Tokyo WTA 1000 R32 Hard Lucie Safarova #35 7-5 6-4 Roberta Vinci #12 Match data
Aug 29, 2013* US Open Grand Slam R64 Hard Roberta Vinci #13 4-6 6-1 6-2 Lucie Safarova #41 Match data
Aug 11, 2012* Montreal WTA 1000 QF Hard Lucie Safarova #23 6-2 6-2 Roberta Vinci #28 Match data
Feb 26, 2009* Acapulco WTA 250 R32 Clay Roberta Vinci #70 6-4 6-4 Lucie Safarova #47 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Lucie Safarova #1,269 #5 4,055 1,929 351 270 56.5% 0 0 0 2 5 7
Roberta Vinci #193 #7 3,615 1,923 320 287 52.7% 0 0 0 2 8 10

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Lucie Safarova Roberta Vinci
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
18 2005 15–9 62.5% #47 1,665 0 2 2001 1–2 33.3% #168 1,485 0 0
19 2006 21–21 50.0% #42 1,625 0 3 2002 3–5 37.5% #184 1,478 0 0
20 2007 28–16 63.6% #23 1,778 0 3 2003 2–2 50.0% #119 1,503 0 0
21 2008 15–19 44.1% #63 1,640 0 4 2004 4–8 33.3% #116 1,507 0 0
22 2009 32–23 58.2% #41 1,768 0 4 2005 15–17 46.9% #41 1,623 0 0
23 2010 27–23 54.0% #33 1,722 0 4 2006 10–16 38.5% #85 1,576 0 0
24 2011 34–23 59.6% #25 1,797 0 4 2007 11–17 39.3% #73 1,561 0 1
25 2012 27–22 55.1% #17 1,771 0 4 2008 5–6 45.5% #84 1,585 0 1
26 2013 26–22 54.2% #29 1,797 0 5 2009 23–23 50.0% #63 1,663 0 2
27 2014 36–23 61.0% #16 1,858 0 5 2010 28–20 58.3% #38 1,817 0 3
28 2015 31–21 59.6% #9 1,829 0 6 2011 37–24 60.7% #23 1,774 0 6
29 2016 14–18 43.8% #62 1,696 0 7 2012 44–27 62.0% #16 1,834 0 7
30 2017 35–19 64.8% #30 1,791 0 7 2013 46–23 66.7% #14 1,853 0 9
31 2018 10–11 47.6% #105 1,754 0 7 2014 21–26 44.7% #47 1,712 0 9
32 — — — — — — — 2015 31–26 54.4% #15 1,765 0 9
33 — — — — — — — 2016 28–22 56.0% #18 1,733 0 10
34 — — — — — — — 2017 10–20 33.3% #116 1,610 0 10
35 — — — — — — — 2018 1–3 25.0% #193 1,628 0 10