H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC
Lucie Safarova vs Sandra Kloesel H2H: 1-0
Lucie Safarova holds a 1–0 lead over Sandra Kloesel in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Lucie Safarova leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Lucie Safarova won the 2008 Roland Garros first round 6-1 6-1.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
CZE
Age 39
Left-Handed
177 cm / 5'10"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
GER
Right-Handed
173 cm / 5'8"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 27, 2008* | Roland Garros | Grand Slam | R128 | Clay | Lucie Safarova | 6-1 6-1 | Sandra Kloesel | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lucie Safarova | #1,269 | #5 | 4,055 | 1,929 | 351 | 270 | 56.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 5 | 7 |
| Sandra Kloesel | #1,064 | #87 | 400 | 1,515 | 16 | 54 | 22.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Lucie Safarova | Sandra Kloesel | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 2005 | 15–9 | 62.5% | #47 | 1,665 | 0 | 2 | 1996 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #172 | 1,487 | 0 | 0 |
| 2006 | 21–21 | 50.0% | #42 | 1,625 | 0 | 3 | 1997 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #117 | 1,476 | 0 | 0 |
| 2007 | 28–16 | 63.6% | #23 | 1,778 | 0 | 3 | 1998 | 2–6 | 25.0% | #177 | 1,463 | 0 | 0 |
| 2008 | 15–19 | 44.1% | #63 | 1,640 | 0 | 4 | 1999 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #150 | 1,489 | 0 | 0 |
| 2009 | 32–23 | 58.2% | #41 | 1,768 | 0 | 4 | 2001 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #393 | 1,473 | 0 | 0 |
| 2010 | 27–23 | 54.0% | #33 | 1,722 | 0 | 4 | 2005 | 2–8 | 20.0% | #101 | 1,463 | 0 | 0 |
| 2011 | 34–23 | 59.6% | #25 | 1,797 | 0 | 4 | 2006 | 4–11 | 26.7% | #96 | 1,477 | 0 | 0 |
| 2012 | 27–22 | 55.1% | #17 | 1,771 | 0 | 4 | 2007 | 4–13 | 23.5% | #164 | 1,424 | 0 | 0 |
| 2013 | 26–22 | 54.2% | #29 | 1,797 | 0 | 5 | 2008 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #158 | 1,404 | 0 | 0 |
| 2014 | 36–23 | 61.0% | #16 | 1,858 | 0 | 5 | 2009 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #745 | 1,393 | 0 | 0 |
| 2015 | 31–21 | 59.6% | #9 | 1,829 | 0 | 6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2016 | 14–18 | 43.8% | #62 | 1,696 | 0 | 7 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2017 | 35–19 | 64.8% | #30 | 1,791 | 0 | 7 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2018 | 10–11 | 47.6% | #105 | 1,754 | 0 | 7 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |