H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC

Lucie Safarova vs Virginie Razzano H2H: 3-0

Lucie Safarova holds a 3–0 lead over Virginie Razzano in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Lucie Safarova leads 2–0 on clay and 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Lucie Safarova won the 2014 Charleston third round 2-6 6-4 6-4.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Lucie Safarova
CZE Age 39 Left-Handed 177 cm / 5'10"
H2H
3 – 0
3 main draw meetings
Virginie Razzano
FRA Age 43 Right-Handed 174 cm / 5'9"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Apr 3, 2014* Charleston WTA 500 R32 Clay Lucie Safarova #26 2-6 6-4 6-4 Virginie Razzano #79 Match data
May 7, 2008* Berlin WTA 1000 R64 Clay Lucie Safarova #42 6-4 7-5 Virginie Razzano #28 Match data
Aug 16, 2006* Montreal WTA 1000 R64 Hard Lucie Safarova #38 7-5 6-4 Virginie Razzano #106 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Lucie Safarova #1,269 #5 4,055 1,929 351 270 56.5% 0 0 0 2 5 7
Virginie Razzano #1,226 #16 2,420 1,876 200 216 48.1% 0 0 0 2 0 2

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Lucie Safarova Virginie Razzano
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 — — — — — — — 1999 0–1 0.0% #344 1,483 0 0
17 — — — — — — — 2000 3–4 42.9% #143 1,507 0 0
18 2005 15–9 62.5% #47 1,665 0 2 2001 10–12 45.5% #87 1,589 0 0
19 2006 21–21 50.0% #42 1,625 0 3 2002 11–12 47.8% #76 1,662 0 0
20 2007 28–16 63.6% #23 1,778 0 3 2003 15–20 42.9% #72 1,613 0 0
21 2008 15–19 44.1% #63 1,640 0 4 2004 7–8 46.7% #60 1,604 0 0
22 2009 32–23 58.2% #41 1,768 0 4 2005 16–22 42.1% #51 1,608 0 0
23 2010 27–23 54.0% #33 1,722 0 4 2006 10–18 35.7% #88 1,595 0 0
24 2011 34–23 59.6% #25 1,797 0 4 2007 34–20 63.0% #28 1,805 0 2
25 2012 27–22 55.1% #17 1,771 0 4 2008 14–20 41.2% #58 1,633 0 2
26 2013 26–22 54.2% #29 1,797 0 5 2009 31–20 60.8% #19 1,801 0 2
27 2014 36–23 61.0% #16 1,858 0 5 2010 9–15 37.5% #113 1,660 0 2
28 2015 31–21 59.6% #9 1,829 0 6 2011 13–13 50.0% #83 1,681 0 2
29 2016 14–18 43.8% #62 1,696 0 7 2012 5–9 35.7% #160 1,633 0 2
30 2017 35–19 64.8% #30 1,791 0 7 2013 9–8 52.9% #99 1,683 0 2
31 2018 10–11 47.6% #105 1,754 0 7 2014 4–8 33.3% #165 1,621 0 2
32 — — — — — — — 2015 4–2 66.7% #200 1,657 0 2
33 — — — — — — — 2016 5–4 55.6% #169 1,647 0 2