H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Ludmila Cervanova vs Natalie Grandin H2H: 0-1
Natalie Grandin holds a 1–0 lead over Ludmila Cervanova in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Natalie Grandin leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Natalie Grandin won the 2005 Birmingham second round 6-1 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
SVK
Age 46
Right-Handed
171 cm / 5'7"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
RSA
Age 45
Left-Handed
175 cm / 5'9"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 8, 2005* | Birmingham | WTA 500 | R64 | Grass | Natalie Grandin | 6-1 6-4 | Ludmila Cervanova | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ludmila Cervanova | #889 | #58 | 578 | 1,694 | 76 | 96 | 44.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Natalie Grandin | #898 | #144 | 244 | 1,500 | 1 | 14 | 6.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Ludmila Cervanova | Natalie Grandin | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | 1998 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #135 | 1,509 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1999 | 5–9 | 35.7% | #102 | 1,530 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 2000 | 3–8 | 27.3% | #122 | 1,491 | 0 | 0 | 2001 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #264 | 1,457 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2001 | 11–16 | 40.7% | #92 | 1,532 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 2002 | 11–15 | 42.3% | #103 | 1,542 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 2003 | 20–14 | 58.8% | #64 | 1,642 | 0 | 0 | 2004 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #196 | 1,427 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2004 | 15–17 | 46.9% | #96 | 1,629 | 0 | 0 | 2005 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #163 | 1,435 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2005 | 7–15 | 31.8% | #119 | 1,486 | 0 | 0 | 2006 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #194 | 1,395 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2006 | 3–1 | 75.0% | #325 | 1,532 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2008 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #259 | 1,391 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2010 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #545 | 1,382 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2011 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #771 | 1,378 | 0 | 0 |