H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 04:32 UTC
Maddison Inglis vs Danielle Collins H2H: 0-1
Danielle Collins holds a 1–0 lead over Maddison Inglis in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Danielle Collins leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Danielle Collins won the 2021 Palermo fourth round 6-4 6-1.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
AUS
Age 28
Right-Handed
171 cm / 5'7"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
USA
Age 32
Right-Handed
178 cm / 5'10"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 23, 2021* | Palermo | WTA 250 | R16 | Clay | Danielle Collins | 6-4 6-1 | Maddison Inglis | Match data |
| Jan 6, 2019 | Sydney | WTA 500 | Q1 | Hard | Danielle Collins | 7-6(3) 6-4 | Maddison Inglis | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Maddison Inglis | #151 | #112 | 654 | 1,674 | 10 | 25 | 28.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Danielle Collins | #343 | #7 | 3,702 | 2,073 | 169 | 115 | 59.5% | 0 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 4 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Maddison Inglis | Danielle Collins | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | 2016 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #551 | 1,483 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2014 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #915 | 1,498 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2020 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #130 | 1,444 | 0 | 0 | 2016 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #259 | 1,493 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2021 | 4–8 | 33.3% | #141 | 1,473 | 0 | 0 | 2017 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #177 | 1,484 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2022 | 3–5 | 37.5% | #180 | 1,484 | 0 | 0 | 2018 | 16–16 | 50.0% | #36 | 1,652 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2019 | 18–17 | 51.4% | #29 | 1,715 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2020 | 10–6 | 62.5% | #45 | 1,811 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2025 | 0–6 | 0.0% | #164 | 1,582 | 0 | 0 | 2021 | 37–15 | 71.2% | #29 | 1,889 | 0 | 2 |
| 28 | 2026 | 3–2 | 60.0% | #151 | 1,595 | 0 | 0 | 2022 | 20–11 | 64.5% | #14 | 1,894 | 0 | 2 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2023 | 18–18 | 50.0% | #52 | 1,853 | 0 | 2 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2024 | 35–15 | 70.0% | #11 | 1,937 | 0 | 4 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2025 | 15–14 | 51.7% | #64 | 1,855 | 0 | 4 |