H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 10:32 UTC
Maddison Inglis vs Danka Kovinic H2H: 1-0
Maddison Inglis holds a 1–0 lead over Danka Kovinic in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Maddison Inglis leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Maddison Inglis won the 2022 Adelaide 2 third round 6-4 1-6 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
AUS
Age 28
Right-Handed
171 cm / 5'7"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
MNE
Age 31
Right-Handed
169 cm / 5'7"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 12, 2022* | Adelaide 2 | WTA 250 | R32 | Hard | Maddison Inglis | 6-4 1-6 6-2 | Danka Kovinic | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Maddison Inglis | #151 | #112 | 654 | 1,674 | 10 | 25 | 28.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Danka Kovinic | #1,327 | #46 | 1,312 | 1,755 | 85 | 121 | 41.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Maddison Inglis | Danka Kovinic | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | 2016 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #551 | 1,483 | 0 | 0 | 2013 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #168 | 1,511 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2014 | 6–12 | 33.3% | #109 | 1,460 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2015 | 16–13 | 55.2% | #57 | 1,623 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2016 | 18–22 | 45.0% | #71 | 1,575 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2020 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #130 | 1,444 | 0 | 0 | 2017 | 3–16 | 15.8% | #121 | 1,454 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2021 | 4–8 | 33.3% | #141 | 1,473 | 0 | 0 | 2018 | 3–5 | 37.5% | #154 | 1,518 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2022 | 3–5 | 37.5% | #180 | 1,484 | 0 | 0 | 2019 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #85 | 1,567 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2020 | 5–7 | 41.7% | #77 | 1,632 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2021 | 12–17 | 41.4% | #96 | 1,583 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2025 | 0–6 | 0.0% | #164 | 1,582 | 0 | 0 | 2022 | 9–11 | 45.0% | #60 | 1,687 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2026 | 3–2 | 60.0% | #151 | 1,595 | 0 | 0 | 2023 | 9–12 | 42.9% | #150 | 1,617 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2026 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #1327 | 1,543 | 0 | 0 |