Maddison Inglis
all rivalries →| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Iga Swiatek | 0 | 2 | 2 | Jan 26, 2026 | H2H |
| Sofia Kenin | 0 | 2 | 2 | Mar 6, 2025 | H2H |
| Sorana Cirstea | 0 | 1 | 1 | Jun 9, 2026 | H2H |
| Naomi Osaka | 1 | 0 | 1 | Jan 24, 2026 | H2H |
| Laura Siegemund | 1 | 0 | 1 | Jan 22, 2026 | H2H |
H2H data updated: 2026-09-13 00:00 UTC
Maddison Inglis vs Kamilla Rakhimova H2H: 1-0
Maddison Inglis holds a 1–0 lead over Kamilla Rakhimova in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Maddison Inglis leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Maddison Inglis won the 2021 Phillip Island Trophy first round 6-3 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
H2H
1
–
0
1 main-draw meetings
H2H Match Log
| Player | Score | Player | Match Data | Date | Round | Tournament | Category | Surface |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Maddison Inglis | 7-5 6-3 | Kamilla Rakhimova | Match data | Jun 7, 2025 | Q1 | Queen's Club Championships | WTA 500 | Grass |
| Maddison Inglis | 6-3 6-3 | Kamilla Rakhimova | Match data | Feb 15, 2021* | R64 | Phillip Island Trophy | WTA 250 | Hard |
1 qualifying meeting shown in the table; qualifying is excluded from the H2H score. Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories | Finals | 500 including documented historical predecessor categories | 250 including documented historical predecessor categories | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Maddison Inglis | #134 | #112 | 654 | 1,674 | 10 | 25 | 28.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Kamilla Rakhimova | #92 | #60 | 1,023 | 1,750 | 58 | 87 | 40.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Maddison Inglis | Kamilla Rakhimova | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2019 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #193 | 1,467 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 2016 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #551 | 1,483 | 0 | 0 | 2020 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #155 | 1,463 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2021 | 5–10 | 33.3% | #120 | 1,546 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2022 | 8–12 | 40.0% | #94 | 1,526 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2023 | 9–14 | 39.1% | #99 | 1,614 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2020 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #130 | 1,444 | 0 | 0 | 2024 | 15–15 | 50.0% | #60 | 1,703 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2021 | 4–8 | 33.3% | #141 | 1,473 | 0 | 0 | 2025 | 8–19 | 29.6% | #97 | 1,716 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2022 | 3–5 | 37.5% | #180 | 1,484 | 0 | 0 | 2026 | 12–15 | 44.4% | #92 | 1,725 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2025 | 0–6 | 0.0% | #164 | 1,581 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 2026 | 3–2 | 60.0% | #134 | 1,627 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Surface Results by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.
| Age | Maddison Inglis | Kamilla Rakhimova | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | |||||||||||||||||||
| W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | |||
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2019 | — | — | — | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 2016 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2020 | — | — | — | — | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2021 | 3 | 6 | 9 | 33.3% | 2 | 4 | 6 | 33.3% | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2022 | 3 | 6 | 9 | 33.3% | 4 | 5 | 9 | 44.4% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% |
| 21 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2023 | 3 | 7 | 10 | 30.0% | 6 | 6 | 12 | 50.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% |
| 22 | 2020 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | 2024 | 9 | 11 | 20 | 45.0% | 6 | 4 | 10 | 60.0% | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 2021 | 3 | 6 | 9 | 33.3% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 2025 | 4 | 14 | 18 | 22.2% | 2 | 3 | 5 | 40.0% | 2 | 2 | 4 | 50.0% |
| 24 | 2022 | 3 | 4 | 7 | 42.9% | — | — | — | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 2026 | 8 | 9 | 17 | 47.1% | 2 | 4 | 6 | 33.3% | 2 | 2 | 4 | 50.0% |
| 27 | 2025 | 0 | 5 | 5 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 2026 | 3 | 1 | 4 | 75.0% | — | — | — | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Career | — | 9 | 19 | 28 | 32.1% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | 0 | 4 | 4 | 0.0% | — | 30 | 53 | 83 | 36.1% | 23 | 28 | 51 | 45.1% | 5 | 6 | 11 | 45.5% |
Performance Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 32/35 of Maddison Inglis's and 138/145 of Kamilla Rakhimova's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.
| Age | Maddison Inglis | Kamilla Rakhimova | ||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Sample | Aces/M | DFs/M | 1st Sv% | 1st Pts% | 2nd Pts% | BP Saved% | BP Conv% | Svc Pts% | Ret Pts% | Yr | Sample | Aces/M | DFs/M | 1st Sv% | 1st Pts% | 2nd Pts% | BP Saved% | BP Conv% | Svc Pts% | Ret Pts% | |
| 17 | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2019 | 1/1 | 1.0 | 4.0 | 56.3% | 50.0% | 46.4% | 37.5% | 50.0% | 48.4% | 37.0% |
| 18 | 2016 | 2/2 | 1.0 | 2.5 | 54.9% | 46.5% | 36.8% | 29.2% | 37.5% | 42.0% | 34.0% | 2020 | 2/2 | 0.5 | 2.5 | 60.6% | 61.5% | 64.2% | 65.2% | 47.6% | 61.6% | 44.4% |
| 19 | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2021 | 15/15 | 1.4 | 3.9 | 60.9% | 60.4% | 46.8% | 44.0% | 51.2% | 54.8% | 42.5% |
| 20 | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2022 | 19/20 | 1.1 | 4.3 | 57.3% | 63.3% | 44.4% | 43.3% | 47.1% | 55.4% | 41.5% |
| 21 | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2023 | 23/23 | 1.3 | 4.0 | 57.7% | 62.7% | 43.5% | 39.6% | 50.0% | 54.4% | 43.6% |
| 22 | 2020 | 2/2 | 0.5 | 3.0 | 71.5% | 51.6% | 41.5% | 45.8% | 52.5% | 48.6% | 39.3% | 2024 | 30/30 | 1.6 | 4.4 | 57.0% | 61.8% | 47.0% | 48.6% | 54.7% | 55.4% | 43.0% |
| 23 | 2021 | 12/12 | 2.0 | 2.8 | 62.7% | 59.4% | 45.8% | 48.3% | 28.1% | 54.2% | 39.6% | 2025 | 22/27 | 1.7 | 4.3 | 56.1% | 59.7% | 42.1% | 48.9% | 48.5% | 52.2% | 42.7% |
| 24 | 2022 | 8/8 | 2.6 | 3.6 | 66.2% | 60.4% | 40.2% | 48.3% | 61.8% | 54.1% | 42.3% | 2026 | 26/27 | 1.2 | 4.6 | 58.8% | 62.3% | 44.9% | 55.1% | 60.6% | 55.2% | 44.9% |
| 27 | 2025 | 4/6 | 2.3 | 4.0 | 59.3% | 53.7% | 47.4% | 40.7% | 25.8% | 51.4% | 36.5% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 2026 | 4/5 | 1.8 | 2.0 | 63.5% | 60.8% | 47.0% | 40.1% | 52.4% | 55.8% | 36.9% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Career | — | 32/35 | 2.0 | 3.0 | 63.3% | 57.8% | 43.9% | 45.0% | 41.4% | 52.9% | 39.2% | — | 138/145 | 1.4 | 4.2 | 57.8% | 61.7% | 45.1% | 47.3% | 52.5% | 54.6% | 43.1% |
Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.
| Age | Maddison Inglis | Kamilla Rakhimova | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2019 | 1468 | 96.2 | +0.09 | -1.64 | 0.718 | 43.2% | — | — | — | 0.0% | -2.50 | — | — | — | +0.23 |
| 18 | 2016 | 1484 | 102.2 | -2.40 | -1.06 | 0.587 | 38.5% | — | — | — | 0.0% | -3.50 | — | — | — | -0.15 | 2020 | 1464 | 104.2 | -0.25 | +2.31 | 1.155 | 52.9% | — | — | — | 50.0% | +0.50 | — | 0–1 | — | -0.09 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2021 | 1546 | 116.6 | -0.82 | -0.58 | 0.940 | 48.7% | -5 | -10 | — | 41.0% | -0.33 | 3–6 (33%) | 1–2 (33%) | — | +0.57 |
| 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2022 | 1527 | 113.4 | -1.03 | -0.83 | 0.931 | 48.5% | -18 | -37 | — | 40.4% | -0.66 | 4–3 (57%) | 4–1 (80%) | 105.7 | +0.10 |
| 21 | 2019 | 1477 | 102.4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2023 | 1615 | 114.7 | -1.15 | +0.12 | 0.956 | 48.9% | -31 | -44 | — | 42.6% | -0.54 | 3–5 (38%) | 6–4 (60%) | 101.1 | -0.10 |
| 22 | 2020 | 1445 | 97.5 | -1.27 | +0.38 | 0.766 | 44.5% | — | — | — | 20.0% | -2.20 | 0–1 | — | — | -0.11 | 2024 | 1704 | 124.4 | -1.36 | +0.06 | 0.964 | 49.4% | -15 | -64 | — | 42.9% | -0.67 | 6–3 (67%) | 2–8 (20%) | 100.1 | +0.26 |
| 23 | 2021 | 1474 | 111.4 | -2.32 | -2.08 | 0.865 | 46.8% | +4 | — | — | 33.3% | -1.44 | 2–1 (67%) | — | — | +0.33 | 2025 | 1716 | 126.6 | -3.08 | -0.92 | 0.892 | 47.5% | -19 | -74 | -59 | 33.3% | -1.03 | 4–5 (44%) | 0–3 (0%) | 97.5 | -1.33 |
| 24 | 2022 | 1485 | 99.8 | -2.83 | -0.47 | 0.921 | 48.4% | +26 | — | — | 42.9% | -1.10 | 2–3 (40%) | 1–0 | — | +0.75 | 2026 | 1726 | 140.9 | -0.89 | +2.03 | 1.002 | 50.1% | +28 | -110 | -65 | 46.2% | 0.00 | 5–6 (45%) | 2–4 (33%) | 100.1 | -1.03 |
| 25 | 2023 | 1475 | 90.8 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | 2024 | 1455 | 100.1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 2025 | 1582 | 115.3 | -2.30 | -1.96 | 0.751 | 43.7% | -5 | — | — | 14.3% | -2.00 | 0–2 | 1–2 (33%) | — | +0.01 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 2026 | 1628 | 113.3 | +0.91 | +0.33 | 0.836 | 46.3% | +32 | — | — | 45.5% | -0.82 | 2–1 (67%) | 2–2 (50%) | 101.4 | -0.15 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Career | — | 1674 | 109.6 | -1.98 | -1.14 | 0.832 | 46.1% | +13 | — | — | 31.7% | -1.51 | 6–8 (43%) | 4–4 (50%) | 99.4 | +2.00 | — | 1751 | 126.7 | -1.38 | +0.11 | 0.951 | 48.9% | -8 | -54 | -62 | 40.9% | -0.54 | 25–28 (47%) | 15–23 (39%) | 100.1 | -0.96 |
Career Rivalries
Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.
Kamilla Rakhimova
all rivalries →| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Camila Osorio | 0 | 5 | 5 | Sep 10, 2025 | H2H |
| Aryna Sabalenka | 0 | 4 | 4 | Sep 4, 2026 | H2H |
| Maria Sakkari | 0 | 4 | 4 | Aug 15, 2026 | H2H |
| Katerina Siniakova | 2 | 1 | 3 | Aug 4, 2026 | H2H |
| Ann Li | 0 | 3 | 3 | Apr 15, 2026 | H2H |