H2H data updated: 2026-09-01 00:00 UTC

Madison Brengle vs Annika Beck H2H: 1-0

Madison Brengle holds a 1–0 lead over Annika Beck in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Madison Brengle leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Madison Brengle won the 2017 Acapulco first round 4-6 6-3 6-2.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Madison Brengle
United States Age 36 Right-Handed 168 cm / 5'6"
H2H
1 – 0
1 main draw meetings
Annika Beck
Germany Age 32 Right-Handed 170 cm / 5'7"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Madison Brengle #92 4-6 6-3 6-2 Annika Beck #61 Match data Mar 1, 2017* R32 Acapulco International → modern equivalent WTA 250 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Madison Brengle #212 #35 1,324 1,722 94 152 38.2% 0 0 0 0 0 0
Annika Beck #903 #37 1,455 1,730 90 115 43.9% 0 0 0 0 2 2

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Madison Brengle Annika Beck
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 2007 1–3 25.0% #229 1,501 0 0 — — — — — — —
18 2008 0–3 0.0% #220 1,457 0 0 2012 2–5 28.6% #78 1,483 0 0
19 2009 1–2 33.3% #165 1,457 0 0 2013 20–24 45.5% #58 1,608 0 0
20 2010 0–1 0.0% #188 1,447 0 0 2014 20–22 47.6% #53 1,664 0 1
21 2011 1–1 50.0% #197 1,460 0 0 2015 20–20 50.0% #58 1,649 0 2
22 2012 0–1 0.0% #191 1,444 0 0 2016 21–27 43.8% #51 1,659 0 2
23 — — — — — — — 2017 7–17 29.2% #178 1,496 0 2
24 2014 4–4 50.0% #95 1,474 0 0 — — — — — — —
25 2015 25–26 49.0% #40 1,622 0 0 — — — — — — —
26 2016 16–23 41.0% #73 1,591 0 0 — — — — — — —
27 2017 10–18 35.7% #83 1,654 0 0 — — — — — — —
28 2018 3–11 21.4% #88 1,604 0 0 — — — — — — —
29 2019 7–11 38.9% #95 1,601 0 0 — — — — — — —
30 2020 2–4 33.3% #82 1,644 0 0 — — — — — — —
31 2021 6–14 30.0% #59 1,645 0 0 — — — — — — —
32 2022 12–16 42.9% #57 1,630 0 0 — — — — — — —
33 2023 6–14 30.0% #151 1,583 0 0 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Madison Brengle Annika Beck
Yr HardClayGrass Yr HardClayGrass
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
17 2007 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 2008 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2012 2 3 5 40.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
19 2009 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2013 9 15 24 37.5% 10 7 17 58.8% 1 2 3 33.3%
20 2010 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 2014 16 13 29 55.2% 2 7 9 22.2% 2 2 4 50.0%
21 2011 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — 2015 10 12 22 45.5% 8 6 14 57.1% 2 2 4 50.0%
22 2012 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 2016 9 18 27 33.3% 10 8 18 55.6% 2 1 3 66.7%
23 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2017 5 10 15 33.3% 2 6 8 25.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
24 2014 4 4 8 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
25 2015 19 16 35 54.3% 6 8 14 42.9% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — —
26 2016 10 16 26 38.5% 1 4 5 20.0% 5 3 8 62.5% — — — — — — — — — — — — —
27 2017 6 14 20 30.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 2018 1 7 8 12.5% 1 3 4 25.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 2019 4 7 11 36.4% 2 3 5 40.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 2020 2 3 5 40.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 2021 2 8 10 20.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 2022 10 10 20 50.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2023 4 9 13 30.8% 1 2 3 33.3% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 65 103 168 38.7% 17 31 48 35.4% 12 18 30 40.0% — 51 71 122 41.8% 32 35 67 47.8% 7 9 16 43.8%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 225/246 of Madison Brengle's and 186/205 of Annika Beck's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Madison Brengle Annika Beck
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
17 2007 4/4 0.8 3.0 60.2% 57.4% 40.8% 48.9% 50.7% 50.5% 41.0% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
18 2008 2/3 0.0 3.0 66.3% 49.4% 35.3% 12.5% 63.6% 45.2% 37.3% 2012 6/7 0.8 6.0 66.0% 59.3% 35.3% 52.6% 51.1% 51.3% 41.7%
19 2009 3/3 0.0 3.7 61.8% 56.2% 38.6% 41.1% 37.6% 49.3% 43.5% 2013 40/44 0.8 4.2 68.6% 57.1% 38.8% 47.7% 46.3% 51.5% 46.6%
20 2010 1/1 1.0 7.0 53.7% 44.4% 38.7% 50.0% 50.0% 41.8% 47.2% 2014 40/42 0.7 3.4 74.1% 55.2% 37.4% 49.6% 53.2% 51.1% 48.4%
21 2011 2/2 0.5 3.5 63.9% 56.3% 44.7% 38.9% 40.0% 52.0% 35.6% 2015 30/40 0.8 3.5 77.3% 55.7% 45.9% 50.5% 54.6% 53.3% 47.3%
22 2012 1/1 5.0 8.0 65.2% 61.3% 35.0% 30.0% 83.3% 52.2% 41.7% 2016 46/48 0.7 2.6 72.1% 56.3% 40.6% 48.1% 55.2% 51.9% 46.6%
23 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2017 24/24 0.3 2.8 72.3% 50.1% 42.2% 42.9% 47.1% 48.2% 42.5%
24 2014 7/8 0.7 3.0 66.2% 62.5% 42.8% 49.4% 47.3% 55.7% 44.3% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
25 2015 35/51 1.7 1.9 66.0% 61.5% 48.8% 42.8% 46.6% 57.2% 41.3% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
26 2016 37/39 0.9 2.2 68.5% 56.8% 45.7% 46.0% 54.9% 53.2% 43.1% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
27 2017 28/28 0.1 2.5 73.3% 54.5% 39.2% 43.7% 45.2% 50.6% 44.1% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
28 2018 14/14 0.4 2.7 66.6% 50.4% 43.5% 42.0% 45.0% 48.4% 43.5% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
29 2019 18/18 0.2 2.2 73.8% 51.9% 37.5% 39.8% 54.6% 48.3% 47.2% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
30 2020 6/6 0.2 3.7 72.6% 50.8% 44.5% 45.3% 38.1% 49.0% 48.3% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
31 2021 20/20 0.0 3.1 74.5% 55.6% 39.8% 42.5% 48.0% 51.4% 44.1% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
32 2022 27/28 0.4 2.9 73.1% 55.8% 39.7% 41.5% 47.1% 51.3% 44.0% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
33 2023 20/20 0.3 2.7 75.1% 54.6% 41.7% 40.9% 51.5% 51.4% 43.0% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
Career — 225/246 0.6 2.6 70.3% 55.9% 42.5% 42.8% 49.0% 52.0% 43.5% — 186/205 0.7 3.4 72.5% 55.4% 40.4% 48.2% 51.6% 51.4% 46.4%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Madison Brengle Annika Beck
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
17 2007 1502 111.1 0.00 +0.02 0.829 46.5% +16 — — 25.0% -1.75 — — — -0.27 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 2008 1458 92.5 -3.04 -1.39 0.681 41.4% — — — 14.3% -2.14 0–1 — — +0.40 2012 1483 99.9 -3.28 -1.53 0.857 46.7% +35 — — 38.9% -0.67 1–3 (25%) 2–0 — +0.20
19 2009 1457 101.5 -2.95 -0.91 0.858 46.1% — — — 33.3% -1.17 — 0–1 — +0.06 2013 1609 119.0 -3.11 +1.67 0.961 49.0% -53 +29 -80 45.6% -0.32 8–9 (47%) 5–7 (42%) — -0.05
20 2010 1447 99.2 -3.58 -2.65 0.810 44.2% — — — 0.0% -3.00 — — — 0.00 2014 1664 130.7 -3.80 +3.73 0.990 49.7% +27 -111 -85 44.7% -0.23 8–4 (67%) 4–7 (36%) — -1.22
21 2011 1460 101.5 -2.09 -1.94 0.741 44.6% — — — 50.0% -1.25 — 1–0 — +0.03 2015 1650 124.8 -3.30 +3.51 1.013 50.5% -24 -25 -40 52.1% +0.40 5–11 (31%) 1–2 (33%) — +0.47
22 2012 1444 99.4 -2.21 +0.67 0.871 47.4% — — — 33.3% -1.00 0–1 1–0 — +0.16 2016 1659 128.1 -3.44 +2.56 0.968 49.3% -63 +23 -17 44.3% -0.28 5–5 (50%) 3–4 (43%) — -0.82
23 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2017 1497 103.0 -5.41 -0.54 0.820 45.6% +38 +82 — 28.0% -1.94 2–2 (50%) 1–0 — -0.41
24 2014 1474 113.6 -0.29 +1.12 1.002 50.0% +31 — — 42.9% -0.64 0–2 1–1 — +0.14 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
25 2015 1622 128.8 -0.60 -0.18 0.964 49.3% +5 -83 — 48.7% -0.07 7–8 (47%) 6–6 (50%) — +0.20 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
26 2016 1592 127.1 -1.99 +0.54 0.921 48.3% +5 -75 +29 42.4% -0.75 7–6 (54%) 3–2 (60%) — -1.69 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
27 2017 1654 130.5 -3.99 +1.18 0.892 47.3% -26 -55 -1 38.2% -0.78 6–6 (50%) 3–2 (60%) — -1.74 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 2018 1605 118.6 -4.52 +0.81 0.843 45.8% -20 -29 — 33.3% -1.36 2–5 (29%) 0–2 — -1.35 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 2019 1602 115.2 -5.23 +2.99 0.913 47.8% -46 -26 — 42.1% -0.68 0–2 2–1 (67%) — -0.29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 2020 1644 121.9 -2.92 +1.95 0.947 48.8% -1 — — 42.9% -1.07 0–2 2–0 — -0.11 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 2021 1645 119.5 -3.17 +0.46 0.907 47.7% +15 -91 +14 34.8% -1.00 2–4 (33%) 0–2 — -0.62 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 2022 1631 135.0 -3.81 +1.21 0.902 47.6% +61 -46 -100 42.6% -0.72 3–3 (50%) 2–1 (67%) — -0.90 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2023 1583 118.6 -4.39 -0.51 0.886 47.1% +13 +7 -81 34.9% -1.26 0–5 (0%) 4–4 (50%) — -0.79 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 2025 1572 102.9 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
36 2026 1529 97.4 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1723 129.6 -2.94 +0.67 0.906 47.8% +6 -59 -14 40.6% -0.76 27–45 (38%) 25–22 (53%) 98.9 -2.77 — 1731 124.6 -3.67 +2.24 0.954 48.9% -16 +3 -57 44.3% -0.33 29–34 (46%) 16–20 (44%) 99.1 -0.89

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.