H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 04:32 UTC
Madison Brengle vs Irina Falconi Hartman H2H: 1-0
Madison Brengle holds a 1–0 lead over Irina Falconi Hartman in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Madison Brengle leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Madison Brengle won the 2015 Australian Open second round 6-1 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
USA
Age 36
Right-Handed
168 cm / 5'6"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
USA
Right-Handed
163 cm / 5'4"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 22, 2015* | Australian Open | Grand Slam | R64 | Hard | Madison Brengle | 6-1 6-3 | Irina Falconi Hartman | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Madison Brengle | #210 | #35 | 1,324 | 1,740 | 94 | 151 | 38.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Irina Falconi Hartman | #1,008 | #63 | 1,005 | 1,614 | 42 | 72 | 36.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Madison Brengle | Irina Falconi Hartman | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 2007 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #229 | 1,502 | 0 | 0 | 2010 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #184 | 1,488 | 0 | 0 |
| 2008 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #220 | 1,457 | 0 | 0 | 2011 | 8–13 | 38.1% | #84 | 1,529 | 0 | 0 |
| 2009 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #165 | 1,456 | 0 | 0 | 2012 | 6–13 | 31.6% | #151 | 1,500 | 0 | 0 |
| 2010 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #188 | 1,447 | 0 | 0 | 2013 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #144 | 1,497 | 0 | 0 |
| 2011 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #197 | 1,459 | 0 | 0 | 2014 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #112 | 1,498 | 0 | 0 |
| 2012 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #191 | 1,444 | 0 | 0 | 2015 | 12–17 | 41.4% | #76 | 1,551 | 0 | 0 |
| 2014 | 4–4 | 50.0% | #95 | 1,503 | 0 | 0 | 2016 | 11–12 | 47.8% | #99 | 1,560 | 0 | 1 |
| 2015 | 25–26 | 49.0% | #40 | 1,627 | 0 | 0 | 2017 | 2–7 | 22.2% | #129 | 1,497 | 0 | 1 |
| 2016 | 16–22 | 42.1% | #73 | 1,602 | 0 | 0 | 2018 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #271 | 1,524 | 0 | 1 |
| 2017 | 10–18 | 35.7% | #83 | 1,656 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2018 | 3–11 | 21.4% | #88 | 1,606 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2019 | 7–11 | 38.9% | #95 | 1,601 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2020 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #82 | 1,641 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2021 | 6–14 | 30.0% | #59 | 1,645 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2022 | 12–16 | 42.9% | #57 | 1,637 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2023 | 6–14 | 30.0% | #151 | 1,586 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |