H2H data updated: 2026-08-08 02:15 UTC
Madison Brengle vs Tamira Paszek H2H: 0-1
Tamira Paszek holds a 1–0 lead over Madison Brengle in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Tamira Paszek leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Tamira Paszek won the 2011 Washington fourth round 6-3 6-1.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
USA
Age 36
Right-Handed
168 cm / 5'6"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
AUT
Age 35
Right-Handed
165 cm / 5'5"
H2H Match Log
| Winner | Score | Loser | Match Data | Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tamira Paszek | 6-3 6-1 | Madison Brengle | Match data | Jul 25, 2011 | Washington | WTA 250 | R16 | Hard |
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Madison Brengle | #213 | #35 | 1,324 | 1,722 | 94 | 151 | 38.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Tamira Paszek | #446 | #299 | 230 | 1,782 | 100 | 129 | 43.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Madison Brengle | Tamira Paszek | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 14 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2005 | 1–1 | 50.0% | — | 1,512 | 0 | 0 |
| 15 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2006 | 6–2 | 75.0% | — | 1,599 | 0 | 1 |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2007 | 15–14 | 51.7% | — | 1,730 | 0 | 1 |
| 17 | 2007 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #229 | 1,501 | 0 | 0 | 2008 | 16–18 | 47.1% | — | 1,697 | 0 | 1 |
| 18 | 2008 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #220 | 1,457 | 0 | 0 | 2009 | 5–9 | 35.7% | — | 1,626 | 0 | 1 |
| 19 | 2009 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #165 | 1,457 | 0 | 0 | 2010 | 9–9 | 50.0% | — | 1,642 | 0 | 2 |
| 20 | 2010 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #188 | 1,447 | 0 | 0 | 2011 | 19–21 | 47.5% | — | 1,654 | 0 | 2 |
| 21 | 2011 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #197 | 1,460 | 0 | 0 | 2012 | 18–21 | 46.2% | — | 1,676 | 0 | 3 |
| 22 | 2012 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #191 | 1,444 | 0 | 0 | 2013 | 2–17 | 10.5% | — | 1,476 | 0 | 3 |
| 23 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2014 | 1–4 | 20.0% | — | 1,469 | 0 | 3 |
| 24 | 2014 | 4–4 | 50.0% | #95 | 1,503 | 0 | 0 | 2015 | 1–4 | 20.0% | — | 1,442 | 0 | 3 |
| 25 | 2015 | 25–26 | 49.0% | #40 | 1,626 | 0 | 0 | 2016 | 7–9 | 43.8% | — | 1,519 | 0 | 3 |
| 26 | 2016 | 16–22 | 42.1% | #73 | 1,604 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 2017 | 10–18 | 35.7% | #83 | 1,655 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 2018 | 3–11 | 21.4% | #88 | 1,606 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 2019 | 7–11 | 38.9% | #95 | 1,602 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 2020 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #82 | 1,642 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 2021 | 6–14 | 30.0% | #59 | 1,644 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 2022 | 12–16 | 42.9% | #57 | 1,630 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 33 | 2023 | 6–14 | 30.0% | #151 | 1,583 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |