H2H data updated: 2026-09-14 00:00 UTC

Madison Brengle vs Tatiana Perebiynis H2H: 0-1

Tatiana Perebiynis holds a 1–0 lead over Madison Brengle in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Tatiana Perebiynis leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Tatiana Perebiynis won the 2008 Australian Open first round 7-5 6-2.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Madison Brengle
United States Age 36 Right-Handed 168 cm / 5'6"
H2H
0 – 1
1 main-draw meetings
Tatiana Perebiynis
UKR Age 43 Right-Handed 173 cm / 5'8"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Tatiana Perebiynis #93 7-5 6-2 Madison Brengle #228 Match data Jan 16, 2008* R128 Australian Open Grand Slam Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Madison Brengle #212 #35 1,324 1,722 94 152 38.2% 0 0 0 0 0 0
Tatiana Perebiynis #1,227 #55 768 1,615 40 71 36.0% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Madison Brengle Tatiana Perebiynis
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 2007 1–3 25.0% #229 1,501 0 0 2000 0–1 0.0% #192 1,488 0 0
18 2008 0–3 0.0% #220 1,457 0 0 2001 2–4 33.3% #138 1,499 0 0
19 2009 1–2 33.3% #165 1,457 0 0 2002 5–7 41.7% #119 1,517 0 0
20 2010 0–1 0.0% #188 1,447 0 0 2003 7–10 41.2% #78 1,554 0 0
21 2011 1–1 50.0% #197 1,460 0 0 2004 10–15 40.0% #91 1,576 0 0
22 2012 0–1 0.0% #191 1,444 0 0 2005 3–14 17.6% #214 1,458 0 0
23 — — — — — — — 2006 2–2 50.0% #161 1,484 0 0
24 2014 4–4 50.0% #95 1,474 0 0 2007 2–4 33.3% #97 1,484 0 0
25 2015 25–26 49.0% #40 1,622 0 0 2008 9–13 40.9% #90 1,572 0 0
26 2016 16–23 41.0% #73 1,591 0 0 2009 0–1 0.0% #867 1,557 0 0
27 2017 10–18 35.7% #83 1,654 0 0 — — — — — — —
28 2018 3–11 21.4% #88 1,604 0 0 — — — — — — —
29 2019 7–11 38.9% #95 1,601 0 0 — — — — — — —
30 2020 2–4 33.3% #82 1,644 0 0 — — — — — — —
31 2021 6–14 30.0% #59 1,645 0 0 — — — — — — —
32 2022 12–16 42.9% #57 1,630 0 0 — — — — — — —
33 2023 6–14 30.0% #151 1,583 0 0 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Madison Brengle Tatiana Perebiynis
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
17 2007 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 2000 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 2008 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 2001 1 3 4 25.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — —
19 2009 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 2002 3 2 5 60.0% 2 4 6 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
20 2010 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 2003 3 4 7 42.9% 1 3 4 25.0% 3 2 5 60.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
21 2011 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 2004 6 7 13 46.2% 2 6 8 25.0% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — —
22 2012 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 2005 2 6 8 25.0% 1 6 7 14.3% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — —
23 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2006 1 1 2 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — —
24 2014 4 4 8 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 2007 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
25 2015 19 16 35 54.3% 6 8 14 42.9% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 2008 4 8 12 33.3% 4 4 8 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
26 2016 10 16 26 38.5% 1 4 5 20.0% 5 3 8 62.5% — — — — 2009 — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
27 2017 6 14 20 30.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 2018 1 7 8 12.5% 1 3 4 25.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 2019 4 7 11 36.4% 2 3 5 40.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 2020 2 3 5 40.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 2021 2 8 10 20.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 2022 10 10 20 50.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2023 4 9 13 30.8% 1 2 3 33.3% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 65 103 168 38.7% 17 31 48 35.4% 12 18 30 40.0% — — — — — 21 34 55 38.2% 12 26 38 31.6% 7 10 17 41.2% 0 1 1 0.0%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 225/246 of Madison Brengle's and 43/92 of Tatiana Perebiynis's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Madison Brengle Tatiana Perebiynis
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
17 2007 4/4 0.8 3.0 60.2% 57.4% 40.8% 48.9% 50.7% 50.5% 41.0% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
18 2008 2/3 0.0 3.0 66.3% 49.4% 35.3% 12.5% 63.6% 45.2% 37.3% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
19 2009 3/3 0.0 3.7 61.8% 56.2% 38.6% 41.1% 37.6% 49.3% 43.5% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
20 2010 1/1 1.0 7.0 53.7% 44.4% 38.7% 50.0% 50.0% 41.8% 47.2% 2003 5/17 2.4 4.0 59.0% 64.6% 48.9% 53.1% 38.0% 57.9% 39.3%
21 2011 2/2 0.5 3.5 63.9% 56.3% 44.7% 38.9% 40.0% 52.0% 35.6% 2004 5/25 4.2 2.6 58.3% 62.4% 33.5% 35.0% 33.7% 50.6% 45.1%
22 2012 1/1 5.0 8.0 65.2% 61.3% 35.0% 30.0% 83.3% 52.2% 41.7% 2005 6/17 2.8 6.7 57.0% 63.0% 42.3% 52.1% 45.0% 53.7% 38.5%
23 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2006 2/4 2.5 2.5 56.9% 63.0% 40.8% 31.4% 30.4% 53.1% 33.4%
24 2014 7/8 0.7 3.0 66.2% 62.5% 42.8% 49.4% 47.3% 55.7% 44.3% 2007 5/6 3.0 2.6 62.0% 62.8% 38.1% 50.6% 38.7% 53.5% 38.3%
25 2015 35/51 1.7 1.9 66.0% 61.5% 48.8% 42.8% 46.6% 57.2% 41.3% 2008 19/22 2.7 2.5 60.7% 62.2% 43.8% 47.5% 52.7% 55.1% 41.2%
26 2016 37/39 0.9 2.2 68.5% 56.8% 45.7% 46.0% 54.9% 53.2% 43.1% 2009 1/1 3.0 4.0 66.7% 57.4% 63.0% 37.5% 50.0% 59.3% 39.1%
27 2017 28/28 0.1 2.5 73.3% 54.5% 39.2% 43.7% 45.2% 50.6% 44.1% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
28 2018 14/14 0.4 2.7 66.6% 50.4% 43.5% 42.0% 45.0% 48.4% 43.5% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
29 2019 18/18 0.2 2.2 73.8% 51.9% 37.5% 39.8% 54.6% 48.3% 47.2% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
30 2020 6/6 0.2 3.7 72.6% 50.8% 44.5% 45.3% 38.1% 49.0% 48.3% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
31 2021 20/20 0.0 3.1 74.5% 55.6% 39.8% 42.5% 48.0% 51.4% 44.1% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
32 2022 27/28 0.4 2.9 73.1% 55.8% 39.7% 41.5% 47.1% 51.3% 44.0% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
33 2023 20/20 0.3 2.7 75.1% 54.6% 41.7% 40.9% 51.5% 51.4% 43.0% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
Career — 225/246 0.6 2.6 70.3% 55.9% 42.5% 42.8% 49.0% 52.0% 43.5% — 43/111 2.9 3.3 59.8% 62.6% 42.6% 46.7% 45.0% 54.5% 40.3%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Madison Brengle Tatiana Perebiynis
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
17 2007 1502 111.1 0.00 +0.02 0.829 46.5% +16 — — 25.0% -1.75 — — — -0.27 2000 1489 98.7 — — — — — — — 0.0% -3.00 — 0–1 — -0.04
18 2008 1458 92.5 -3.04 -1.39 0.681 41.4% — — — 14.3% -2.14 0–1 — — +0.40 2001 1499 106.2 — — — — +10 — — 41.2% -0.65 2–3 (40%) 0–2 — -0.42
19 2009 1457 101.5 -2.95 -0.91 0.858 46.1% — — — 33.3% -1.17 — 0–1 — +0.06 2002 1517 113.5 — — — — +21 +3 — 48.3% +0.21 1–4 (20%) 1–1 — +0.04
20 2010 1447 99.2 -3.58 -2.65 0.810 44.2% — — — 0.0% -3.00 — — — 0.00 2003 1555 113.5 +0.84 -2.26 0.935 48.2% -9 -59 +76 44.4% -0.14 2–2 (50%) 1–3 (25%) 99.1 +0.33
21 2011 1460 101.5 -2.09 -1.94 0.741 44.6% — — — 50.0% -1.25 — 1–0 — +0.03 2004 1577 115.8 -1.40 +0.18 0.913 47.3% -12 -88 +27 46.4% -0.41 0–6 (0%) 3–5 (38%) 92.3 +0.62
22 2012 1444 99.4 -2.21 +0.67 0.871 47.4% — — — 33.3% -1.00 0–1 1–0 — +0.16 2005 1458 105.0 -1.09 -2.12 0.832 46.3% +71 -37 — 28.6% -1.57 2–6 (25%) 1–2 (33%) 96.1 +0.30
23 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2006 1484 101.4 -0.56 -1.98 0.711 43.3% — — — 40.0% -1.00 2–0 — — +0.18
24 2014 1474 113.6 -0.29 +1.12 1.002 50.0% +31 — — 42.9% -0.64 0–2 1–1 — +0.14 2007 1484 108.5 -1.64 -2.19 0.822 46.3% +53 — — 35.7% -1.21 1–1 — — +0.65
25 2015 1622 128.8 -0.60 -0.18 0.964 49.3% +5 -83 — 48.7% -0.07 7–8 (47%) 6–6 (50%) 100.8 +0.20 2008 1573 124.1 +0.92 -0.90 0.917 48.5% -27 -48 — 40.4% -0.77 2–1 (67%) 1–2 (33%) 102.3 -0.70
26 2016 1592 127.1 -1.99 +0.54 0.921 48.3% +5 -75 +29 42.4% -0.75 7–6 (54%) 3–2 (60%) 103.3 -1.69 2009 1558 99.3 +0.80 -1.09 0.960 48.6% — — — 33.3% -1.00 0–1 — — +0.07
27 2017 1654 130.5 -4.01 +1.14 0.892 47.3% -26 -55 -1 38.2% -0.78 6–6 (50%) 3–2 (60%) 102.1 -1.74 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 2018 1605 118.6 -4.52 +0.81 0.843 45.8% -20 -29 — 33.3% -1.36 2–5 (29%) 0–2 — -1.35 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 2019 1602 115.2 -5.23 +2.99 0.913 47.8% -46 -26 — 42.1% -0.68 0–2 2–1 (67%) — -0.29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 2020 1644 121.9 -2.92 +1.95 0.947 48.8% -1 — — 42.9% -1.07 0–2 2–0 — -0.11 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 2021 1645 119.5 -3.17 +0.46 0.907 47.7% +15 -91 +14 34.8% -1.00 2–4 (33%) 0–2 — -0.62 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 2022 1631 135.0 -3.81 +1.21 0.902 47.6% +61 -46 -100 42.6% -0.72 3–3 (50%) 2–1 (67%) 101.1 -0.90 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2023 1583 118.6 -4.39 -0.51 0.886 47.1% +13 +7 -81 34.9% -1.26 0–5 (0%) 4–4 (50%) 95.1 -0.79 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 2025 1572 102.9 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
36 2026 1521 97.2 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1723 129.4 -2.95 +0.67 0.906 47.8% +6 -59 -14 40.6% -0.76 27–45 (38%) 25–22 (53%) 98.9 -2.77 — 1615 118.0 -0.01 -1.31 0.886 47.5% +6 -47 +54 40.6% -0.67 12–24 (33%) 7–16 (30%) 89.7 +0.94

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.