H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 16:32 UTC

Madison Brengle vs Venus Williams H2H: 0-1

Venus Williams holds a 1–0 lead over Madison Brengle in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Venus Williams leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Venus Williams won the 2015 Wimbledon first round 6-0 6-0.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Madison Brengle
USA Age 36 Right-Handed 168 cm / 5'6"
H2H
0 – 1
1 main draw meetings
Venus Williams
USA Age 46 Right-Handed 185 cm / 6'1"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Jul 1, 2015* Wimbledon Grand Slam R128 Grass Venus Williams #16 6-0 6-0 Madison Brengle #36 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Madison Brengle #210 #35 1,324 1,740 94 151 38.4% 0 0 0 0 0 0
Venus Williams #467 #1 7,452 2,362 768 288 72.7% 7 9 1 20 10 47

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Madison Brengle Venus Williams
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
14 — — — — — — — 1994 1–1 50.0% — 1,525 0 0
15 — — — — — — — 1995 2–3 40.0% #205 1,561 0 0
16 — — — — — — — 1996 2–5 28.6% #216 1,571 0 0
17 2007 1–3 25.0% #229 1,502 0 0 1997 20–13 60.6% #22 1,851 0 0
18 2008 0–3 0.0% #220 1,457 0 0 1998 50–13 79.4% #5 2,094 0 2
19 2009 1–2 33.3% #165 1,456 0 0 1999 57–11 83.8% #3 2,258 0 8
20 2010 0–1 0.0% #188 1,447 0 0 2000 35–4 89.7% #3 2,321 2 13
21 2011 1–1 50.0% #197 1,459 0 0 2001 46–6 88.5% #3 2,338 4 19
22 2012 0–1 0.0% #191 1,444 0 0 2002 63–9 87.5% #2 2,297 4 26
23 — — — — — — — 2003 24–5 82.8% #11 2,257 4 27
24 2014 4–4 50.0% #95 1,503 0 0 2004 40–13 75.5% #9 2,072 4 29
25 2015 25–26 49.0% #40 1,627 0 0 2005 34–10 77.3% #10 2,085 5 31
26 2016 16–22 42.1% #73 1,602 0 0 2006 13–6 68.4% #46 2,007 5 31
27 2017 10–18 35.7% #83 1,656 0 0 2007 46–10 82.1% #8 2,048 6 34
28 2018 3–11 21.4% #88 1,606 0 0 2008 37–10 78.7% #6 2,133 7 37
29 2019 7–11 38.9% #95 1,601 0 0 2009 38–16 70.4% #6 1,981 7 39
30 2020 2–4 33.3% #82 1,641 0 0 2010 38–7 84.4% #5 2,057 7 41
31 2021 6–14 30.0% #59 1,645 0 0 2011 8–4 66.7% #102 1,994 7 41
32 2022 12–16 42.9% #57 1,637 0 0 2012 22–8 73.3% #24 2,007 7 42
33 2023 6–14 30.0% #151 1,586 0 0 2013 15–11 57.7% #47 1,889 7 42
34 — — — — — — — 2014 33–15 68.8% #18 1,874 7 43
35 — — — — — — — 2015 39–14 73.6% #7 1,957 7 46
36 — — — — — — — 2016 24–14 63.2% #17 1,830 7 47
37 — — — — — — — 2017 38–15 71.7% #5 1,935 7 47
38 — — — — — — — 2018 15–11 57.7% #39 1,867 7 47
39 — — — — — — — 2019 20–15 57.1% #52 1,827 7 47
40 — — — — — — — 2020 1–8 11.1% #79 1,717 7 47
41 — — — — — — — 2021 3–9 25.0% #318 1,649 7 47
42 — — — — — — — 2022 0–4 0.0% #1000 1,603 7 47
43 — — — — — — — 2023 3–7 30.0% #412 1,594 7 47