H2H data updated: 2026-09-14 00:00 UTC

Madison Keys vs Anastasia Pavlyuchenkova H2H: 2-3

Anastasia Pavlyuchenkova holds a 3–2 lead over Madison Keys in their WTA head-to-head. Across 5 main-draw meetings, Anastasia Pavlyuchenkova leads 2–1 on clay, while they are tied 1–1 on hard courts. Most recently, Anastasia Pavlyuchenkova won the 2021 Indian Wells Open second round 6-3 6-1.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Madison Keys
United States Age 31 Right-Handed 178 cm / 5'10"
H2H
2 – 3
5 main-draw meetings
Anastasia Pavlyuchenkova
Russia Age 35 Right-Handed 177 cm / 5'10"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Anastasia Pavlyuchenkova #13 6-3 6-1 Madison Keys #50 Match data Oct 9, 2021* R64 Indian Wells Open WTA 1000 Hard
Anastasia Pavlyuchenkova #41 7-5 6-2 Madison Keys #23 Match data May 1, 2021* R64 Madrid Open WTA 1000 Clay
Madison Keys #14 6-4 6-1 Anastasia Pavlyuchenkova #29 Match data May 16, 2018* R64 Italian Open Premier 5 → modern equivalent WTA 1000 Clay
Anastasia Pavlyuchenkova #27 7-6(7) 5-7 6-4 Madison Keys #13 Match data Apr 26, 2018* R32 Porsche Tennis Grand Prix Premier → modern equivalent WTA 500 Clay
Madison Keys #12 7-6(3) 1-6 6-0 Anastasia Pavlyuchenkova #19 Match data Jul 30, 2016* QF Canadian Open Premier 5 → modern equivalent WTA 1000 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Madison Keys #24 #5 5,004 2,134 374 217 63.3% 1 1 0 7 2 11
Anastasia Pavlyuchenkova #445 #11 3,590 1,944 422 328 56.3% 0 0 0 2 10 12

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Madison Keys Anastasia Pavlyuchenkova
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
14 2009 1–1 50.0% #616 1,512 0 0 2006 0–1 0.0% #377 1,497 0 0
15 — — — — — — — 2007 0–1 0.0% #286 1,494 0 0
16 2011 1–2 33.3% #273 1,516 0 0 2008 10–8 55.6% #45 1,593 0 0
17 2012 1–4 20.0% #137 1,514 0 0 2009 24–20 54.5% #40 1,702 0 0
18 2013 24–17 58.5% #38 1,725 0 0 2010 39–21 65.0% #21 1,824 0 2
19 2014 27–21 56.2% #30 1,743 0 1 2011 37–21 63.8% #16 1,813 0 3
20 2015 31–19 62.0% #18 1,810 0 1 2012 21–23 47.7% #36 1,712 0 3
21 2016 46–18 71.9% #8 1,943 0 2 2013 33–22 60.0% #26 1,798 0 5
22 2017 17–10 63.0% #19 1,902 0 3 2014 26–20 56.5% #24 1,764 0 7
23 2018 28–16 63.6% #17 1,907 0 3 2015 34–21 61.8% #28 1,868 0 8
24 2019 27–13 67.5% #13 1,913 0 5 2016 26–25 51.0% #27 1,749 0 8
25 2020 8–5 61.5% #16 1,869 0 5 2017 41–23 64.1% #15 1,832 0 11
26 2021 11–15 42.3% #56 1,733 0 5 2018 21–21 50.0% #42 1,806 0 12
27 2022 30–19 61.2% #11 1,865 0 6 2019 22–21 51.2% #31 1,797 0 12
28 2023 29–16 64.4% #12 1,907 0 7 2020 9–8 52.9% #38 1,802 0 12
29 2024 25–12 67.6% #21 1,945 0 8 2021 27–19 58.7% #11 1,835 0 12
30 2025 37–15 71.2% #7 1,964 1 10 2022 2–3 40.0% #367 1,793 0 12
31 2026 31–14 68.9% #24 1,982 1 11 2023 14–12 53.8% #58 1,814 0 12
32 — — — — — — — 2024 25–20 55.6% #30 1,846 0 12
33 — — — — — — — 2025 11–12 47.8% #47 1,811 0 12
34 — — — — — — — 2026 0–6 0.0% #445 1,727 0 12

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Madison Keys Anastasia Pavlyuchenkova
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
14 2009 — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — 2006 — — — — — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
15 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2007 — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
16 2011 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — 2008 4 4 8 50.0% 4 3 7 57.1% 2 1 3 66.7% — — — —
17 2012 1 4 5 20.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 2009 17 12 29 58.6% 4 5 9 44.4% 2 2 4 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
18 2013 14 11 25 56.0% 5 4 9 55.6% 5 2 7 71.4% — — — — 2010 31 14 45 68.9% 5 4 9 55.6% 2 2 4 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
19 2014 14 14 28 50.0% 5 5 10 50.0% 8 2 10 80.0% — — — — 2011 26 15 41 63.4% 10 4 14 71.4% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — —
20 2015 18 12 30 60.0% 9 5 14 64.3% 4 2 6 66.7% — — — — 2012 11 14 25 44.0% 7 7 14 50.0% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — —
21 2016 28 13 41 68.3% 10 4 14 71.4% 8 1 9 88.9% — — — — 2013 26 16 42 61.9% 7 4 11 63.6% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
22 2017 15 5 20 75.0% 1 4 5 20.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — 2014 16 13 29 55.2% 4 5 9 44.4% 1 2 3 33.3% 5 0 5 100.0%
23 2018 16 10 26 61.5% 10 5 15 66.7% 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — 2015 29 14 43 67.4% 3 5 8 37.5% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — —
24 2019 16 9 25 64.0% 10 3 13 76.9% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — 2016 18 18 36 50.0% 4 4 8 50.0% 4 3 7 57.1% — — — —
25 2020 8 4 12 66.7% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 2017 31 17 48 64.6% 8 3 11 72.7% 2 3 5 40.0% — — — —
26 2021 3 9 12 25.0% 3 4 7 42.9% 5 2 7 71.4% — — — — 2018 12 14 26 46.2% 8 4 12 66.7% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — —
27 2022 25 14 39 64.1% 4 4 8 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — 2019 21 16 37 56.8% 1 4 5 20.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
28 2023 14 12 26 53.8% 6 3 9 66.7% 9 1 10 90.0% — — — — 2020 6 4 10 60.0% 3 4 7 42.9% — — — — — — — —
29 2024 7 6 13 53.8% 13 4 17 76.5% 5 2 7 71.4% — — — — 2021 15 14 29 51.7% 10 3 13 76.9% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — —
30 2025 24 8 32 75.0% 9 4 13 69.2% 4 3 7 57.1% — — — — 2022 2 1 3 66.7% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — —
31 2026 14 9 23 60.9% 7 3 10 70.0% 10 2 12 83.3% — — — — 2023 6 8 14 42.9% 8 4 12 66.7% — — — — — — — —
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2024 21 13 34 61.8% 3 5 8 37.5% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — —
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2025 6 8 14 42.9% 1 3 4 25.0% 4 1 5 80.0% — — — —
34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2026 0 5 5 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
Career — 218 142 360 60.6% 93 54 147 63.3% 63 21 84 75.0% — — — — — 298 220 518 57.5% 90 74 164 54.9% 27 30 57 47.4% 7 4 11 63.6%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 543/591 of Madison Keys's and 675/751 of Anastasia Pavlyuchenkova's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Madison Keys Anastasia Pavlyuchenkova
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
14 2009 2/2 3.0 2.0 47.5% 66.4% 55.5% 44.4% 41.7% 60.1% 39.4% 2006 1/1 2.0 4.0 52.9% 63.0% 41.7% 42.9% 50.0% 52.9% 33.3%
15 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2007 1/1 0.0 3.0 55.6% 30.0% 25.0% 25.0% — 27.8% 14.3%
16 2011 3/3 5.0 6.3 55.4% 67.2% 46.9% 60.5% 44.8% 58.2% 44.8% 2008 14/18 1.9 3.1 57.9% 64.6% 45.1% 37.4% 48.4% 56.5% 45.9%
17 2012 5/5 2.0 3.4 58.1% 56.5% 44.8% 38.4% 32.9% 51.2% 36.0% 2009 43/44 2.0 5.1 58.9% 64.8% 43.9% 52.3% 46.7% 56.0% 44.0%
18 2013 39/41 5.4 2.1 59.6% 70.0% 48.7% 65.0% 45.9% 61.4% 42.4% 2010 54/60 2.6 5.3 59.2% 64.8% 45.4% 54.3% 46.6% 56.8% 46.4%
19 2014 45/48 4.8 1.9 60.0% 69.4% 50.0% 50.9% 48.7% 61.9% 43.5% 2011 55/58 3.0 6.1 60.1% 67.0% 46.1% 50.9% 53.5% 58.3% 46.3%
20 2015 38/50 7.3 2.2 62.2% 71.5% 51.3% 61.5% 48.1% 64.1% 41.2% 2012 40/44 2.4 5.6 59.2% 64.5% 41.9% 50.5% 46.8% 55.0% 42.7%
21 2016 49/64 5.5 1.9 64.4% 70.5% 52.7% 60.1% 52.6% 64.1% 43.8% 2013 47/55 2.9 5.4 56.6% 68.7% 46.2% 52.4% 48.3% 59.1% 44.5%
22 2017 27/27 4.5 2.9 62.7% 69.2% 49.3% 59.9% 47.8% 62.0% 43.9% 2014 38/46 3.9 7.4 56.4% 69.2% 39.6% 55.3% 52.4% 56.4% 42.7%
23 2018 42/44 5.3 1.6 64.0% 71.2% 47.8% 57.5% 45.0% 62.8% 44.2% 2015 38/55 2.3 5.4 65.0% 65.0% 49.8% 53.2% 46.1% 59.4% 40.5%
24 2019 40/40 6.9 2.5 62.0% 71.3% 47.2% 59.7% 46.2% 62.0% 43.9% 2016 42/51 2.8 4.0 62.7% 65.6% 43.7% 49.9% 53.7% 57.3% 45.0%
25 2020 13/13 4.8 0.9 67.7% 72.9% 51.8% 55.6% 48.6% 66.2% 44.1% 2017 64/64 3.0 4.5 62.3% 65.3% 46.2% 57.3% 45.7% 58.2% 45.1%
26 2021 26/26 4.6 2.4 63.7% 66.7% 43.0% 58.2% 39.9% 58.2% 41.3% 2018 40/42 2.6 4.3 65.0% 66.1% 43.9% 53.5% 44.9% 58.5% 42.8%
27 2022 48/49 4.4 3.1 63.3% 67.9% 48.2% 54.1% 44.3% 60.8% 43.7% 2019 43/43 2.3 4.7 62.3% 64.5% 43.4% 52.8% 52.7% 56.5% 44.2%
28 2023 43/45 3.9 1.9 67.5% 68.3% 48.3% 60.2% 48.0% 62.0% 44.4% 2020 17/17 2.6 4.9 68.4% 63.0% 42.0% 43.8% 46.7% 56.8% 44.8%
29 2024 36/37 3.8 2.7 69.4% 66.5% 46.5% 60.4% 46.5% 60.6% 44.9% 2021 40/46 2.5 3.5 67.9% 64.9% 45.5% 51.1% 50.1% 58.6% 44.6%
30 2025 42/52 4.4 3.8 65.8% 66.8% 46.6% 57.8% 44.0% 59.9% 45.5% 2022 5/5 1.6 4.0 76.0% 63.4% 43.9% 59.5% 62.2% 57.8% 47.5%
31 2026 45/45 4.2 3.5 64.3% 71.5% 47.4% 56.1% 48.8% 63.0% 45.1% 2023 26/26 3.0 4.8 62.0% 65.2% 45.9% 57.5% 47.3% 57.1% 45.2%
32 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2024 44/45 3.3 4.0 61.4% 66.7% 49.9% 53.6% 49.7% 60.5% 43.2%
33 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2025 18/24 3.3 4.9 60.8% 65.5% 42.7% 48.1% 49.6% 56.0% 39.6%
34 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2026 5/6 2.8 5.0 55.8% 63.4% 35.4% 43.7% 16.8% 51.0% 34.4%
Career — 543/591 5.0 2.5 63.7% 69.3% 48.5% 58.1% 46.7% 61.8% 43.7% — 675/751 2.7 5.0 61.4% 65.7% 44.9% 52.4% 48.6% 57.5% 44.0%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Madison Keys Anastasia Pavlyuchenkova
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
14 2009 1513 104.9 -0.92 -0.60 0.987 49.0% — — — 50.0% -0.75 — — — -0.15 2006 1497 106.7 -0.12 +2.94 0.708 42.6% — — — 0.0% -3.00 — — — -0.15
15 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2007 1495 95.3 -1.54 +1.90 0.198 21.9% — — — 0.0% -5.50 — — — -0.22
16 2011 1517 113.3 -3.13 -0.25 1.071 51.6% +19 — — 50.0% +0.25 0–2 0–1 — -0.02 2008 1594 123.9 +0.60 +1.13 1.055 51.1% -34 -21 +41 55.0% +0.70 2–2 (50%) 2–3 (40%) 100.0 -0.10
17 2012 1514 113.2 -0.48 -2.14 0.738 43.5% +13 — — 18.2% -2.09 1–0 0–1 — -0.51 2009 1703 137.4 +0.76 +0.27 1.001 50.1% +30 -139 -61 55.8% +0.34 4–7 (36%) 6–5 (55%) 96.6 +1.57
18 2013 1726 137.3 +4.59 -0.90 1.100 51.9% -46 -118 -57 58.2% +0.62 4–5 (44%) 5–6 (45%) 99.0 +0.04 2010 1824 147.5 +0.89 +3.14 1.073 51.5% +11 -209 -176 60.6% +0.69 12–5 (71%) 6–3 (67%) 108.5 -0.83
19 2014 1744 136.9 +5.12 +0.02 1.142 52.3% -64 -93 +79 56.9% +0.45 6–10 (38%) 7–8 (47%) 96.1 -0.67 2011 1813 146.7 +2.42 +2.57 1.110 52.3% -13 -37 -201 62.8% +0.83 11–14 (44%) 8–7 (53%) 95.3 -0.73
20 2015 1811 145.8 +4.84 +0.40 1.147 52.7% -23 -103 +11 63.6% +1.03 7–8 (47%) 5–5 (50%) 96.8 +0.70 2012 1713 124.6 -0.76 -0.32 0.950 49.0% -8 +17 -68 45.2% -0.40 7–4 (64%) 2–3 (40%) 101.2 +0.72
21 2016 1943 152.0 +7.53 +1.31 1.219 53.7% -32 -117 -34 65.8% +1.11 17–6 (74%) 14–10 (58%) 107.1 -0.49 2013 1799 143.5 +3.24 +0.98 1.086 51.6% +2 -43 — 58.4% +0.54 10–9 (53%) 9–7 (56%) 100.1 -0.38
22 2017 1903 141.2 +3.97 +1.46 1.155 52.9% +43 -160 — 62.5% +0.75 4–6 (40%) 4–2 (67%) 97.5 +0.26 2014 1764 137.7 +1.25 -0.29 0.980 49.9% +33 -44 -144 54.8% +0.26 13–7 (65%) 8–5 (62%) 104.1 +0.90
23 2018 1908 147.8 +5.83 +1.52 1.190 53.3% +17 -74 -12 68.1% +1.16 5–6 (45%) 7–4 (64%) 100.2 +1.54 2015 1869 139.6 +1.52 -0.40 0.997 49.9% +23 -165 -236 54.6% +0.17 14–3 (82%) 9–8 (53%) 108.8 -1.25
24 2019 1913 148.9 +4.30 +0.69 1.158 52.9% +7 -4 — 66.3% +1.05 7–7 (50%) 8–5 (62%) 99.5 +0.99 2016 1750 138.9 +1.58 +1.71 1.055 51.0% -10 -52 -71 49.5% +0.19 7–8 (47%) 7–7 (50%) 96.0 -0.64
25 2020 1869 136.6 +5.26 +1.22 1.305 54.4% +23 — — 65.4% +1.46 1–1 1–1 — +0.59 2017 1833 151.2 +2.14 +2.10 1.077 51.6% +42 -19 -187 58.9% +0.68 16–9 (64%) 7–10 (41%) 101.9 -0.09
26 2021 1733 127.6 +1.29 -0.81 0.988 49.7% +11 +120 +234 43.6% -0.07 3–2 (60%) 0–5 (0%) 97.1 +1.25 2018 1806 145.1 +1.80 +0.68 1.031 50.5% +1 +47 -166 49.5% +0.06 7–10 (41%) 8–5 (62%) 98.9 -1.51
27 2022 1866 154.5 +3.52 +1.76 1.116 52.1% +14 -43 — 61.1% +0.58 8–9 (47%) 11–3 (79%) 100.5 -1.43 2019 1797 148.1 +0.11 +1.68 1.017 50.5% +27 -20 — 51.5% +0.15 7–10 (41%) 5–3 (63%) 96.0 -0.49
28 2023 1908 154.0 +4.44 +2.18 1.168 53.1% -24 -103 +181 65.3% +1.28 5–6 (45%) 5–5 (50%) 98.3 +0.85 2020 1803 141.4 +0.01 +2.18 1.037 50.4% +63 -58 — 50.0% +0.20 4–2 (67%) 4–5 (44%) 102.3 -0.92
29 2024 1945 153.9 +3.89 +2.77 1.137 52.5% -67 +54 +149 67.1% +1.18 5–3 (63%) 9–3 (75%) 105.9 +0.01 2021 1835 148.9 +1.86 +2.03 1.077 51.4% -27 +92 -189 58.1% +0.77 6–7 (46%) 4–9 (31%) 94.1 -0.77
30 2025 1964 160.3 +2.87 +2.39 1.133 52.4% +63 +39 +107 63.5% +0.80 16–6 (73%) 10–7 (59%) 107.8 -0.52 2022 1793 111.4 +0.38 +1.45 1.125 52.8% +16 — — 53.8% +0.69 0–3 (0%) — — +0.51
31 2026 1982 152.9 +5.10 +2.77 1.218 53.6% -16 +39 +175 65.7% +1.21 8–8 (50%) 6–7 (46%) 93.5 +1.19 2023 1815 138.1 +0.92 +1.92 1.054 51.1% -40 +71 — 50.8% +0.34 6–3 (67%) 3–4 (43%) 101.6 -0.81
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2024 1846 155.5 +3.69 +0.67 1.095 51.8% +87 -44 -230 56.0% +0.51 6–8 (43%) 7–2 (78%) 100.6 -0.60
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2025 1811 137.4 -0.74 -2.12 0.901 47.9% +27 -60 -83 46.3% -0.35 5–3 (63%) 6–4 (60%) 104.0 -0.66
34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2026 1728 114.6 -1.24 -1.82 0.702 43.0% +26 — — 7.7% -2.46 0–1 0–1 — -0.26
Career — 2135 155.9 +4.47 +1.22 1.145 52.6% -6 -39 +96 62.4% +0.87 97–85 (53%) 92–73 (56%) 101.0 +0.62 — 1944 149.9 +1.44 +1.21 1.037 50.8% +15 -30 -132 54.5% +0.35 137–115 (54%) 101–91 (53%) 100.2 -0.90

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.