H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 04:32 UTC

Madison Keys vs Anastasia Pavlyuchenkova H2H: 2-3

Anastasia Pavlyuchenkova holds a 3–2 lead over Madison Keys in their WTA head-to-head. Across 5 main-draw meetings, Anastasia Pavlyuchenkova leads 2–1 on clay, while they are tied 1–1 on hard courts. Most recently, Anastasia Pavlyuchenkova won the 2021 Indian Wells second round 6-3 6-1.

USA Age 31 Right-Handed 178 cm / 5'10"
H2H
2 3
5 main draw meetings
RUS Age 35 Right-Handed 177 cm / 5'10"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Oct 9, 2021* Indian Wells WTA 1000 R64 Hard Anastasia Pavlyuchenkova #13 6-3 6-1 Madison Keys #50 Match data
May 1, 2021* Madrid WTA 1000 R64 Clay Anastasia Pavlyuchenkova #41 7-5 6-2 Madison Keys #23 Match data
May 16, 2018* Rome WTA 1000 R64 Clay Madison Keys #14 6-4 6-1 Anastasia Pavlyuchenkova #29 Match data
Apr 26, 2018* Stuttgart WTA 500 R32 Clay Anastasia Pavlyuchenkova #27 7-6(7) 5-7 6-4 Madison Keys #13 Match data
Jul 30, 2016* Montreal WTA 1000 QF Hard Madison Keys #12 7-6(3) 1-6 6-0 Anastasia Pavlyuchenkova #19 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Madison Keys #23 #5 4,999 2,136 363 211 63.2% 1 1 0 6 3 11
Anastasia Pavlyuchenkova #400 #11 3,590 1,936 415 324 56.2% 0 0 0 8 4 12

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Madison Keys Anastasia Pavlyuchenkova
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
14 2009 1–1 50.0% #616 1,512 0 0 2006 0–1 0.0% #377 1,497 0 0
15 2007 0–1 0.0% #286 1,494 0 0
16 2011 1–2 33.3% #273 1,516 0 0 2008 10–8 55.6% #45 1,592 0 0
17 2012 1–4 20.0% #137 1,514 0 0 2009 24–20 54.5% #40 1,701 0 0
18 2013 24–17 58.5% #38 1,726 0 0 2010 39–21 65.0% #21 1,822 0 2
19 2014 27–21 56.2% #30 1,742 0 1 2011 37–21 63.8% #16 1,830 0 3
20 2015 31–19 62.0% #18 1,802 0 1 2012 21–23 47.7% #36 1,716 0 3
21 2016 41–16 71.9% #8 1,915 0 2 2013 33–22 60.0% #26 1,799 0 5
22 2017 17–10 63.0% #19 1,892 0 3 2014 26–20 56.5% #24 1,763 0 7
23 2018 28–15 65.1% #17 1,899 0 3 2015 34–21 61.8% #28 1,867 0 8
24 2019 27–13 67.5% #13 1,910 0 5 2016 23–23 50.0% #27 1,744 0 8
25 2020 8–5 61.5% #16 1,866 0 5 2017 41–23 64.1% #15 1,832 0 11
26 2021 11–15 42.3% #56 1,731 0 5 2018 20–20 50.0% #42 1,805 0 12
27 2022 30–19 61.2% #11 1,863 0 6 2019 22–21 51.2% #31 1,796 0 12
28 2023 29–17 63.0% #12 1,879 0 7 2020 9–8 52.9% #38 1,800 0 12
29 2024 25–12 67.6% #21 1,950 0 8 2021 24–18 57.1% #11 1,826 0 12
30 2025 37–15 71.2% #7 1,964 1 10 2022 2–3 40.0% #367 1,786 0 12
31 2026 25–10 71.4% #23 2,020 1 11 2023 14–12 53.8% #58 1,812 0 12
32 2024 25–20 55.6% #30 1,839 0 12
33 2025 11–12 47.8% #47 1,808 0 12
34 2026 0–6 0.0% #400 1,725 0 12