H2H data updated: 2026-09-13 00:00 UTC

Madison Keys vs Lesia Tsurenko H2H: 3-0

Madison Keys holds a 3–0 lead over Lesia Tsurenko in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Madison Keys leads 2–0 on hard courts and 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Madison Keys won the 2017 Stanford quarterfinal 6-4 6-3.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Madison Keys
United States Age 31 Right-Handed 178 cm / 5'10"
H2H
3 – 0
3 main-draw meetings
Lesia Tsurenko
Ukraine Age 37 Right-Handed 174 cm / 5'9"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Madison Keys #21 6-4 6-3 Lesia Tsurenko #32 Match data Aug 5, 2017* QF Stanford Premier → modern equivalent WTA 500 Hard
Madison Keys #35 6-3 7-5 Lesia Tsurenko #90 Match data Jan 21, 2015* R128 Australian Open Grand Slam Hard
Madison Keys #53 3-6 6-3 7-6(3) Lesia Tsurenko #76 Match data Jun 12, 2013* R64 Birmingham International → modern equivalent WTA 250 Grass

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Madison Keys #24 #5 5,004 2,134 374 217 63.3% 1 1 0 7 2 11
Lesia Tsurenko #386 #23 2,030 1,898 180 202 47.1% 0 0 0 0 4 4

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Madison Keys Lesia Tsurenko
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
14 2009 1–1 50.0% #616 1,512 0 0 — — — — — — —
16 2011 1–2 33.3% #273 1,516 0 0 — — — — — — —
17 2012 1–4 20.0% #137 1,514 0 0 — — — — — — —
18 2013 24–17 58.5% #38 1,725 0 0 — — — — — — —
19 2014 27–21 56.2% #30 1,743 0 1 — — — — — — —
20 2015 31–19 62.0% #18 1,810 0 1 2009 0–1 0.0% #284 1,483 0 0
21 2016 46–18 71.9% #8 1,943 0 2 2010 1–3 25.0% #155 1,468 0 0
22 2017 17–10 63.0% #19 1,902 0 3 2011 3–7 30.0% #113 1,467 0 0
23 2018 28–16 63.6% #17 1,907 0 3 2012 7–12 36.8% #116 1,484 0 0
24 2019 27–13 67.5% #13 1,913 0 5 2013 11–18 37.9% #68 1,505 0 0
25 2020 8–5 61.5% #16 1,869 0 5 2014 4–8 33.3% #92 1,510 0 0
26 2021 11–15 42.3% #56 1,733 0 5 2015 22–17 56.4% #33 1,720 0 1
27 2022 30–19 61.2% #11 1,865 0 6 2016 19–20 48.7% #57 1,724 0 2
28 2023 29–16 64.4% #12 1,907 0 7 2017 22–24 47.8% #42 1,688 0 3
29 2024 25–12 67.6% #21 1,945 0 8 2018 26–19 57.8% #27 1,808 0 4
30 2025 37–15 71.2% #7 1,964 1 10 2019 14–14 50.0% #73 1,735 0 4
31 2026 31–14 68.9% #24 1,982 1 11 2020 1–3 25.0% #146 1,766 0 4
32 — — — — — — — 2021 6–10 37.5% #118 1,746 0 4
33 — — — — — — — 2022 10–11 47.6% #137 1,765 0 4
34 — — — — — — — 2023 24–15 61.5% #31 1,870 0 4
35 — — — — — — — 2024 10–20 33.3% #115 1,697 0 4

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Madison Keys Lesia Tsurenko
Yr HardClayGrass Yr HardClayGrass
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
14 2009 — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
16 2011 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 2012 1 4 5 20.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 2013 14 11 25 56.0% 5 4 9 55.6% 5 2 7 71.4% — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 2014 14 14 28 50.0% 5 5 10 50.0% 8 2 10 80.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 2015 18 12 30 60.0% 9 5 14 64.3% 4 2 6 66.7% 2009 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
21 2016 28 13 41 68.3% 10 4 14 71.4% 8 1 9 88.9% 2010 0 1 1 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — —
22 2017 15 5 20 75.0% 1 4 5 20.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 2011 1 3 4 25.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
23 2018 16 10 26 61.5% 10 5 15 66.7% 2 1 3 66.7% 2012 4 7 11 36.4% 3 4 7 42.9% 0 1 1 0.0%
24 2019 16 9 25 64.0% 10 3 13 76.9% 1 1 2 50.0% 2013 7 10 17 41.2% 1 5 6 16.7% 3 3 6 50.0%
25 2020 8 4 12 66.7% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2014 3 6 9 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
26 2021 3 9 12 25.0% 3 4 7 42.9% 5 2 7 71.4% 2015 20 12 32 62.5% 1 2 3 33.3% 1 3 4 25.0%
27 2022 25 14 39 64.1% 4 4 8 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 2016 14 11 25 56.0% 4 6 10 40.0% 1 3 4 25.0%
28 2023 14 12 26 53.8% 6 3 9 66.7% 9 1 10 90.0% 2017 14 15 29 48.3% 3 5 8 37.5% 5 4 9 55.6%
29 2024 7 6 13 53.8% 13 4 17 76.5% 5 2 7 71.4% 2018 20 14 34 58.8% 3 3 6 50.0% 3 2 5 60.0%
30 2025 24 8 32 75.0% 9 4 13 69.2% 4 3 7 57.1% 2019 10 6 16 62.5% 2 4 6 33.3% 2 4 6 33.3%
31 2026 14 9 23 60.9% 7 3 10 70.0% 10 2 12 83.3% 2020 0 2 2 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2021 5 9 14 35.7% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2022 2 5 7 28.6% 3 3 6 50.0% 5 3 8 62.5%
34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2023 13 10 23 56.5% 8 4 12 66.7% 3 1 4 75.0%
35 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2024 9 15 24 37.5% 1 4 5 20.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
Career — 218 142 360 60.6% 93 54 147 63.3% 63 21 84 75.0% — 122 127 249 49.0% 34 48 82 41.5% 24 27 51 47.1%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 543/591 of Madison Keys's and 353/383 of Lesia Tsurenko's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Madison Keys Lesia Tsurenko
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
14 2009 2/2 3.0 2.0 47.5% 66.4% 55.5% 44.4% 41.7% 60.1% 39.4% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
16 2011 3/3 5.0 6.3 55.4% 67.2% 46.9% 60.5% 44.8% 58.2% 44.8% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
17 2012 5/5 2.0 3.4 58.1% 56.5% 44.8% 38.4% 32.9% 51.2% 36.0% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
18 2013 39/41 5.4 2.1 59.6% 70.0% 48.7% 65.0% 45.9% 61.4% 42.4% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
19 2014 45/48 4.8 1.9 60.0% 69.4% 50.0% 50.9% 48.7% 61.9% 43.5% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
20 2015 38/50 7.3 2.2 62.2% 71.5% 51.3% 61.5% 48.1% 64.1% 41.2% 2009 1/1 0.0 0.0 67.3% 54.3% 41.2% 55.6% 16.7% 50.0% 38.6%
21 2016 49/64 5.5 1.9 64.4% 70.5% 52.7% 60.1% 52.6% 64.1% 43.8% 2010 4/4 1.0 3.8 61.0% 59.3% 41.5% 45.5% 53.9% 52.3% 39.6%
22 2017 27/27 4.5 2.9 62.7% 69.2% 49.3% 59.9% 47.8% 62.0% 43.9% 2011 10/10 1.0 4.5 66.1% 57.8% 37.4% 47.0% 48.7% 50.7% 44.4%
23 2018 42/44 5.3 1.6 64.0% 71.2% 47.8% 57.5% 45.0% 62.8% 44.2% 2012 17/19 0.6 6.3 61.4% 56.3% 38.9% 40.3% 55.0% 49.7% 45.7%
24 2019 40/40 6.9 2.5 62.0% 71.3% 47.2% 59.7% 46.2% 62.0% 43.9% 2013 27/29 1.3 5.2 61.6% 59.8% 45.0% 44.2% 53.6% 54.0% 45.8%
25 2020 13/13 4.8 0.9 67.7% 72.9% 51.8% 55.6% 48.6% 66.2% 44.1% 2014 12/12 2.3 5.6 58.7% 59.9% 45.7% 52.5% 41.0% 54.5% 42.5%
26 2021 26/26 4.6 2.4 63.7% 66.7% 43.0% 58.2% 39.9% 58.2% 41.3% 2015 31/39 1.5 4.3 69.1% 63.2% 53.5% 55.0% 49.7% 59.5% 44.8%
27 2022 48/49 4.4 3.1 63.3% 67.9% 48.2% 54.1% 44.3% 60.8% 43.7% 2016 35/39 1.6 5.0 64.8% 60.5% 44.8% 50.5% 53.2% 54.9% 45.5%
28 2023 43/45 3.9 1.9 67.5% 68.3% 48.3% 60.2% 48.0% 62.0% 44.4% 2017 44/46 1.6 4.1 65.6% 61.5% 44.4% 49.1% 52.0% 55.6% 45.4%
29 2024 36/37 3.8 2.7 69.4% 66.5% 46.5% 60.4% 46.5% 60.6% 44.9% 2018 41/45 1.8 4.5 64.4% 61.8% 46.5% 54.0% 47.5% 56.2% 46.0%
30 2025 42/52 4.4 3.8 65.8% 66.8% 46.6% 57.8% 44.0% 59.9% 45.5% 2019 28/28 1.6 3.3 69.7% 59.1% 43.8% 51.0% 54.3% 54.4% 44.8%
31 2026 45/45 4.2 3.5 64.3% 71.5% 47.4% 56.1% 48.8% 63.0% 45.1% 2020 3/4 1.0 4.0 65.0% 53.6% 42.6% 35.2% 43.8% 50.0% 42.8%
32 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2021 16/16 0.0 3.0 65.8% 55.1% 43.1% 45.6% 55.2% 51.2% 49.3%
33 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2022 19/21 0.3 3.2 64.4% 53.7% 43.8% 49.8% 49.2% 49.9% 45.1%
34 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2023 37/40 0.1 3.1 66.2% 57.5% 43.0% 47.8% 54.7% 52.7% 50.3%
35 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2024 28/30 0.2 4.9 63.5% 55.1% 40.2% 47.0% 46.8% 49.5% 43.7%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Madison Keys Lesia Tsurenko
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
14 2009 1513 104.9 -0.92 -0.60 0.987 49.0% — — — 50.0% -0.75 — — — -0.15 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
16 2011 1517 113.3 -3.13 -0.25 1.071 51.6% +19 — — 50.0% +0.25 0–2 0–1 — -0.02 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 2012 1514 113.2 -0.48 -2.14 0.738 43.5% +13 — — 18.2% -2.09 1–0 0–1 — -0.51 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 2013 1726 137.3 +4.59 -0.90 1.100 51.9% -46 -118 -57 58.2% +0.62 4–5 (44%) 5–6 (45%) 99.0 +0.04 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 2014 1744 136.9 +5.12 +0.02 1.142 52.3% -64 -93 +79 56.9% +0.45 6–10 (38%) 7–8 (47%) 96.1 -0.67 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 2015 1811 145.8 +4.84 +0.40 1.147 52.7% -23 -103 +11 63.6% +1.03 7–8 (47%) 5–5 (50%) 96.8 +0.70 2009 1483 96.1 -0.16 -0.74 0.771 43.4% — — — 0.0% -3.50 — — — +0.15
21 2016 1943 152.0 +7.53 +1.31 1.219 53.7% -32 -117 -34 65.8% +1.11 17–6 (74%) 14–10 (58%) 107.1 -0.49 2010 1468 101.2 -1.44 -1.76 0.831 46.3% — +62 — 25.0% -1.88 — 1–0 — +0.08
22 2017 1903 141.2 +3.97 +1.46 1.155 52.9% +43 -160 — 62.5% +0.75 4–6 (40%) 4–2 (67%) 97.5 +0.26 2011 1468 104.4 -3.16 -0.61 0.900 47.5% +23 +64 — 23.5% -1.41 1–0 0–2 — -0.34
23 2018 1908 147.8 +5.83 +1.52 1.190 53.3% +17 -74 -12 68.1% +1.16 5–6 (45%) 7–4 (64%) 100.2 +1.54 2012 1485 109.3 -4.45 +0.03 0.909 47.7% 0 +73 — 40.9% -0.71 4–4 (50%) 3–1 (75%) 102.4 +0.05
24 2019 1913 148.9 +4.30 +0.69 1.158 52.9% +7 -4 — 66.3% +1.05 7–7 (50%) 8–5 (62%) 99.5 +0.99 2013 1505 119.0 -1.69 +1.15 0.995 49.9% +10 -7 +46 40.6% -0.36 4–6 (40%) 1–4 (20%) 97.5 +0.31
25 2020 1869 136.6 +5.26 +1.22 1.305 54.4% +23 — — 65.4% +1.46 1–1 1–1 — +0.59 2014 1510 105.5 -1.40 -0.49 0.933 48.6% -11 — — 36.7% -0.70 3–3 (50%) 2–2 (50%) 100.7 +0.32
26 2021 1733 127.6 +1.29 -0.81 0.988 49.7% +11 +120 +234 43.6% -0.07 3–2 (60%) 0–5 (0%) 97.1 +1.25 2015 1721 139.7 +1.11 +2.63 1.105 52.2% +8 — -177 59.3% +0.80 5–6 (45%) 6–5 (55%) 102.2 +0.25
27 2022 1866 154.5 +3.52 +1.76 1.116 52.1% +14 -43 — 61.1% +0.58 8–9 (47%) 11–3 (79%) 100.5 -1.43 2016 1725 125.5 -0.94 +1.32 1.009 50.2% +25 -190 -217 50.6% +0.07 7–3 (70%) 3–6 (33%) 103.6 +1.38
28 2023 1908 154.0 +4.44 +2.18 1.168 53.1% -24 -103 +181 65.3% +1.28 5–6 (45%) 5–5 (50%) 98.3 +0.85 2017 1689 134.1 -0.08 +2.63 1.024 50.6% +20 -134 -107 47.9% -0.10 5–7 (42%) 7–6 (54%) 100.9 -1.57
29 2024 1945 153.9 +3.89 +2.77 1.137 52.5% -67 +54 +149 67.1% +1.18 5–3 (63%) 9–3 (75%) 105.9 +0.01 2018 1808 142.9 -0.18 +2.84 1.051 51.2% +2 -219 -158 60.4% +0.77 8–3 (73%) 5–3 (63%) 106.6 +0.69
30 2025 1964 160.3 +2.87 +2.39 1.133 52.4% +63 +39 +107 63.5% +0.80 16–6 (73%) 10–7 (59%) 107.8 -0.52 2019 1736 136.2 -1.34 +1.80 0.981 49.5% +99 -130 -117 46.6% -0.22 3–1 (75%) 1–3 (25%) 100.6 -0.24
31 2026 1982 152.9 +5.09 +2.77 1.218 53.6% -16 +39 +175 65.7% +1.21 8–8 (50%) 6–7 (46%) 93.5 +1.20 2020 1767 118.5 +0.32 +2.54 0.856 46.8% — — — 42.9% -1.14 0–1 — — -0.91
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2021 1746 128.4 -2.98 +2.74 1.009 50.1% +22 — — 43.8% -0.44 0–4 (0%) 1–1 — -0.04
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2022 1766 127.9 -3.73 +2.57 0.901 47.5% -41 -82 -3 57.5% +0.18 5–3 (63%) 2–2 (50%) 102.9 -1.59
34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2023 1870 139.4 -2.54 +6.34 1.063 51.5% -23 -32 -93 62.0% +0.68 7–2 (78%) 3–1 (75%) 107.3 -1.77
35 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2024 1697 119.9 -5.55 +0.83 0.866 46.6% +16 +33 — 41.4% -0.93 4–4 (50%) 1–0 — +0.10
Career — 2135 155.9 +4.46 +1.22 1.145 52.6% -6 -39 +96 62.4% +0.87 97–85 (53%) 92–73 (56%) 101.0 +0.62 — 1898 136.0 -1.67 +2.21 0.991 49.8% +13 -65 -90 49.5% -0.03 56–47 (54%) 36–36 (50%) 105.0 -0.84

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.