H2H data updated: 2026-09-12 00:00 UTC

Madison Keys vs Magda Linette H2H: 3-0

Madison Keys holds a 3–0 lead over Magda Linette in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Madison Keys leads 2–0 on clay and 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Madison Keys won the 2024 Strasbourg Open quarterfinal 6-1 6-3.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Madison Keys
United States Age 31 Right-Handed 178 cm / 5'10"
H2H
3 – 0
3 main-draw meetings
Magda Linette
Poland Age 34 Right-Handed 171 cm / 5'7"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Madison Keys #16 6-1 6-3 Magda Linette #50 Match data May 24, 2024* QF Strasbourg Open WTA 500 Clay
Madison Keys #22 6-2 3-6 6-1 Magda Linette #19 Match data Apr 7, 2023* R16 Charleston Open WTA 500 Clay
Madison Keys #15 6-3 6-3 Magda Linette #57 Match data Oct 19, 2022* R64 Guadalajara Open WTA 1000 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Madison Keys #24 #5 5,004 2,134 374 217 63.3% 1 1 0 7 2 11
Magda Linette #82 #19 1,921 1,863 221 234 48.6% 0 0 0 0 4 4

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Madison Keys Magda Linette
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
14 2009 1–1 50.0% #616 1,512 0 0 — — — — — — —
16 2011 1–2 33.3% #273 1,516 0 0 — — — — — — —
17 2012 1–4 20.0% #137 1,514 0 0 — — — — — — —
18 2013 24–17 58.5% #38 1,725 0 0 — — — — — — —
19 2014 27–21 56.2% #30 1,743 0 1 — — — — — — —
20 2015 31–19 62.0% #18 1,810 0 1 — — — — — — —
21 2016 46–18 71.9% #8 1,943 0 2 2013 4–2 66.7% #123 1,535 0 0
22 2017 17–10 63.0% #19 1,902 0 3 2014 2–4 33.3% #133 1,517 0 0
23 2018 28–16 63.6% #17 1,907 0 3 2015 9–11 45.0% #90 1,576 0 0
24 2019 27–13 67.5% #13 1,913 0 5 2016 10–16 38.5% #96 1,583 0 0
25 2020 8–5 61.5% #16 1,869 0 5 2017 17–23 42.5% #72 1,727 0 0
26 2021 11–15 42.3% #56 1,733 0 5 2018 15–18 45.5% #81 1,601 0 0
27 2022 30–19 61.2% #11 1,865 0 6 2019 24–18 57.1% #43 1,781 0 2
28 2023 29–16 64.4% #12 1,907 0 7 2020 11–11 50.0% #40 1,722 0 3
29 2024 25–12 67.6% #21 1,945 0 8 2021 16–17 48.5% #57 1,763 0 3
30 2025 37–15 71.2% #7 1,964 1 10 2022 23–22 51.1% #48 1,719 0 3
31 2026 31–14 68.9% #24 1,982 1 11 2023 24–24 50.0% #24 1,732 0 3
32 — — — — — — — 2024 28–26 51.9% #38 1,830 0 4
33 — — — — — — — 2025 19–24 44.2% #54 1,742 0 4
34 — — — — — — — 2026 19–18 51.4% #82 1,743 0 4

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Madison Keys Magda Linette
Yr HardClayGrass Yr HardClayGrass
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
14 2009 — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
16 2011 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 2012 1 4 5 20.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 2013 14 11 25 56.0% 5 4 9 55.6% 5 2 7 71.4% — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 2014 14 14 28 50.0% 5 5 10 50.0% 8 2 10 80.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 2015 18 12 30 60.0% 9 5 14 64.3% 4 2 6 66.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — —
21 2016 28 13 41 68.3% 10 4 14 71.4% 8 1 9 88.9% 2013 3 1 4 75.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
22 2017 15 5 20 75.0% 1 4 5 20.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 2014 2 4 6 33.3% — — — — — — — —
23 2018 16 10 26 61.5% 10 5 15 66.7% 2 1 3 66.7% 2015 8 8 16 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3%
24 2019 16 9 25 64.0% 10 3 13 76.9% 1 1 2 50.0% 2016 10 12 22 45.5% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 3 3 0.0%
25 2020 8 4 12 66.7% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2017 10 15 25 40.0% 6 5 11 54.5% 1 3 4 25.0%
26 2021 3 9 12 25.0% 3 4 7 42.9% 5 2 7 71.4% 2018 13 11 24 54.2% 2 5 7 28.6% 0 2 2 0.0%
27 2022 25 14 39 64.1% 4 4 8 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 2019 20 11 31 64.5% 2 5 7 28.6% 2 2 4 50.0%
28 2023 14 12 26 53.8% 6 3 9 66.7% 9 1 10 90.0% 2020 9 8 17 52.9% 2 3 5 40.0% — — — —
29 2024 7 6 13 53.8% 13 4 17 76.5% 5 2 7 71.4% 2021 9 10 19 47.4% 5 6 11 45.5% 2 1 3 66.7%
30 2025 24 8 32 75.0% 9 4 13 69.2% 4 3 7 57.1% 2022 13 14 27 48.1% 6 4 10 60.0% 4 4 8 50.0%
31 2026 14 9 23 60.9% 7 3 10 70.0% 10 2 12 83.3% 2023 16 16 32 50.0% 4 5 9 44.4% 4 3 7 57.1%
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2024 11 16 27 40.7% 16 7 23 69.6% 1 3 4 25.0%
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2025 13 17 30 43.3% 3 4 7 42.9% 3 3 6 50.0%
34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2026 13 13 26 50.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 3 2 5 60.0%
Career — 218 142 360 60.6% 93 54 147 63.3% 63 21 84 75.0% — 150 156 306 49.0% 50 50 100 50.0% 21 28 49 42.9%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 543/591 of Madison Keys's and 421/457 of Magda Linette's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Madison Keys Magda Linette
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
14 2009 2/2 3.0 2.0 47.5% 66.4% 55.5% 44.4% 41.7% 60.1% 39.4% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
16 2011 3/3 5.0 6.3 55.4% 67.2% 46.9% 60.5% 44.8% 58.2% 44.8% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
17 2012 5/5 2.0 3.4 58.1% 56.5% 44.8% 38.4% 32.9% 51.2% 36.0% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
18 2013 39/41 5.4 2.1 59.6% 70.0% 48.7% 65.0% 45.9% 61.4% 42.4% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
19 2014 45/48 4.8 1.9 60.0% 69.4% 50.0% 50.9% 48.7% 61.9% 43.5% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
20 2015 38/50 7.3 2.2 62.2% 71.5% 51.3% 61.5% 48.1% 64.1% 41.2% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
21 2016 49/64 5.5 1.9 64.4% 70.5% 52.7% 60.1% 52.6% 64.1% 43.8% 2013 4/6 0.5 1.8 72.3% 53.8% 53.4% 29.2% 46.4% 54.1% 42.2%
22 2017 27/27 4.5 2.9 62.7% 69.2% 49.3% 59.9% 47.8% 62.0% 43.9% 2014 4/6 3.8 4.8 57.4% 64.6% 42.5% 71.4% 31.7% 55.7% 43.7%
23 2018 42/44 5.3 1.6 64.0% 71.2% 47.8% 57.5% 45.0% 62.8% 44.2% 2015 10/20 2.3 3.3 63.7% 62.2% 50.9% 51.9% 48.3% 58.0% 40.1%
24 2019 40/40 6.9 2.5 62.0% 71.3% 47.2% 59.7% 46.2% 62.0% 43.9% 2016 25/26 2.2 3.5 62.7% 62.0% 44.8% 47.4% 37.4% 55.3% 39.1%
25 2020 13/13 4.8 0.9 67.7% 72.9% 51.8% 55.6% 48.6% 66.2% 44.1% 2017 40/40 2.6 2.5 67.9% 63.5% 46.3% 43.8% 40.5% 57.7% 41.5%
26 2021 26/26 4.6 2.4 63.7% 66.7% 43.0% 58.2% 39.9% 58.2% 41.3% 2018 30/33 2.3 3.8 63.5% 62.1% 46.1% 50.1% 47.8% 55.9% 42.4%
27 2022 48/49 4.4 3.1 63.3% 67.9% 48.2% 54.1% 44.3% 60.8% 43.7% 2019 40/42 4.0 2.9 57.0% 66.2% 48.4% 55.6% 51.6% 58.7% 43.3%
28 2023 43/45 3.9 1.9 67.5% 68.3% 48.3% 60.2% 48.0% 62.0% 44.4% 2020 22/22 2.4 3.2 60.8% 65.8% 44.0% 49.4% 45.6% 57.5% 41.2%
29 2024 36/37 3.8 2.7 69.4% 66.5% 46.5% 60.4% 46.5% 60.6% 44.9% 2021 31/33 3.5 3.0 62.0% 68.2% 45.1% 51.6% 51.1% 59.3% 43.5%
30 2025 42/52 4.4 3.8 65.8% 66.8% 46.6% 57.8% 44.0% 59.9% 45.5% 2022 45/45 3.5 2.6 63.9% 65.5% 49.5% 52.4% 42.2% 59.7% 42.8%
31 2026 45/45 4.2 3.5 64.3% 71.5% 47.4% 56.1% 48.8% 63.0% 45.1% 2023 48/49 2.5 1.8 67.0% 62.0% 48.8% 45.6% 46.1% 57.4% 41.6%
32 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2024 52/54 3.3 1.9 61.7% 65.2% 47.9% 58.0% 46.4% 58.4% 41.7%
33 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2025 36/44 3.8 2.4 59.8% 63.1% 45.8% 55.3% 42.3% 55.8% 39.6%
34 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2026 34/37 3.3 2.1 57.6% 63.9% 46.1% 43.9% 40.4% 56.3% 39.6%
Career — 543/591 5.0 2.5 63.7% 69.3% 48.5% 58.1% 46.7% 61.8% 43.7% — 421/457 3.1 2.6 62.4% 64.2% 47.1% 50.6% 44.8% 57.6% 41.6%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Madison Keys Magda Linette
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
14 2009 1513 104.9 -0.92 -0.60 0.987 49.0% — — — 50.0% -0.75 — — — -0.15 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
16 2011 1517 113.3 -3.13 -0.25 1.071 51.6% +19 — — 50.0% +0.25 0–2 0–1 — -0.02 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 2012 1514 113.2 -0.48 -2.14 0.738 43.5% +13 — — 18.2% -2.09 1–0 0–1 — -0.51 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 2013 1726 137.3 +4.59 -0.90 1.100 51.9% -46 -118 -57 58.2% +0.62 4–5 (44%) 5–6 (45%) 99.0 +0.04 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 2014 1744 136.9 +5.12 +0.02 1.142 52.3% -64 -93 +79 56.9% +0.45 6–10 (38%) 7–8 (47%) 96.1 -0.67 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 2015 1811 145.8 +4.84 +0.40 1.147 52.7% -23 -103 +11 63.6% +1.03 7–8 (47%) 5–5 (50%) 96.8 +0.70 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
21 2016 1943 152.0 +7.53 +1.31 1.219 53.7% -32 -117 -34 65.8% +1.11 17–6 (74%) 14–10 (58%) 107.1 -0.49 2013 1536 102.2 -1.11 -2.42 0.920 48.0% +21 — — 54.5% +0.09 1–0 1–0 — +0.79
22 2017 1903 141.2 +3.97 +1.46 1.155 52.9% +43 -160 — 62.5% +0.75 4–6 (40%) 4–2 (67%) 97.5 +0.26 2014 1518 109.9 -1.03 -1.10 0.986 49.6% +15 — — 42.9% -0.14 0–2 — — +0.11
23 2018 1908 147.8 +5.83 +1.52 1.190 53.3% +17 -74 -12 68.1% +1.16 5–6 (45%) 7–4 (64%) 100.2 +1.54 2015 1576 118.7 -0.76 -1.01 0.955 49.2% +15 — +23 50.0% -0.26 3–5 (38%) 5–2 (71%) 101.4 -0.29
24 2019 1913 148.9 +4.30 +0.69 1.158 52.9% +7 -4 — 66.3% +1.05 7–7 (50%) 8–5 (62%) 99.5 +0.99 2016 1583 116.6 -0.13 -2.61 0.875 48.3% +3 — -35 36.2% -1.00 5–3 (63%) 4–3 (57%) 104.7 -0.02
25 2020 1869 136.6 +5.26 +1.22 1.305 54.4% +23 — — 65.4% +1.46 1–1 1–1 — +0.59 2017 1728 126.9 +1.02 -1.27 0.983 49.5% +21 -159 -224 44.6% -0.31 6–9 (40%) 4–2 (67%) 101.3 +0.07
26 2021 1733 127.6 +1.29 -0.81 0.988 49.7% +11 +120 +234 43.6% -0.07 3–2 (60%) 0–5 (0%) 97.1 +1.25 2018 1601 117.5 -0.12 -0.67 0.960 49.1% +33 -43 — 46.2% -0.27 6–6 (50%) 3–5 (38%) 97.4 +0.76
27 2022 1866 154.5 +3.52 +1.76 1.116 52.1% +14 -43 — 61.1% +0.58 8–9 (47%) 11–3 (79%) 100.5 -1.43 2019 1782 135.1 +1.80 +0.35 1.048 51.1% +25 -283 -262 53.6% +0.20 9–6 (60%) 11–6 (65%) 108.4 -0.23
28 2023 1908 154.0 +4.44 +2.18 1.168 53.1% -24 -103 +181 65.3% +1.28 5–6 (45%) 5–5 (50%) 98.3 +0.85 2020 1723 127.0 +0.87 -1.08 0.968 49.2% +28 -204 — 50.0% +0.06 3–3 (50%) 3–2 (60%) 98.1 +0.72
29 2024 1945 153.9 +3.89 +2.77 1.137 52.5% -67 +54 +149 67.1% +1.18 5–3 (63%) 9–3 (75%) 105.9 +0.01 2021 1764 135.6 +2.54 +1.11 1.068 51.3% -9 -174 -225 52.7% 0.00 3–11 (21%) 4–1 (80%) 95.7 -1.54
30 2025 1964 160.3 +2.87 +2.39 1.133 52.4% +63 +39 +107 63.5% +0.80 16–6 (73%) 10–7 (59%) 107.8 -0.52 2022 1719 132.3 +2.26 -0.34 1.061 50.9% +7 -34 -131 49.5% +0.06 8–7 (53%) 10–6 (63%) 105.0 +0.37
31 2026 1982 152.9 +5.10 +2.77 1.218 53.6% -16 +39 +175 65.7% +1.21 8–8 (50%) 6–7 (46%) 93.5 +1.20 2023 1732 137.3 +0.60 -0.62 0.977 49.5% +15 -77 -90 46.8% -0.20 10–7 (59%) 6–10 (38%) 101.1 -0.04
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2024 1830 141.2 +1.60 -0.83 1.002 50.2% -97 +38 -210 52.8% +0.07 9–12 (43%) 9–6 (60%) 100.0 -1.33
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2025 1742 140.4 -0.56 -2.21 0.896 47.9% -16 +96 -155 44.8% -0.53 6–5 (55%) 7–2 (78%) 107.1 +0.26
34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2026 1743 135.6 -0.18 -1.88 0.907 48.0% -30 +88 -68 45.6% -0.20 13–3 (81%) 3–4 (43%) 108.6 -0.01
Career — 2135 155.9 +4.47 +1.22 1.145 52.6% -6 -39 +96 62.4% +0.87 97–85 (53%) 92–73 (56%) 101.0 +0.62 — 1863 136.6 +0.89 -0.87 0.980 49.6% -1 -62 -137 48.0% -0.17 82–79 (51%) 70–49 (59%) 109.8 -0.08

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.