H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 22:32 UTC
Madison Keys vs Patty Schnyder H2H: 0-1
Patty Schnyder holds a 1–0 lead over Madison Keys in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Patty Schnyder leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Patty Schnyder won the 2011 Miami first round 3-6 6-1 7-6(2).
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
USA
Age 31
Right-Handed
178 cm / 5'10"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
SUI
Age 47
Left-Handed
168 cm / 5'6"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 22, 2011* | Miami | WTA 1000 | R128 | Hard | Patty Schnyder | 3-6 6-1 7-6(2) | Madison Keys | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Madison Keys | #23 | #5 | 4,999 | 2,136 | 363 | 211 | 63.2% | 1 | 1 | 0 | 6 | 3 | 11 |
| Patty Schnyder | #278 | #7 | 3,050 | 1,987 | 492 | 346 | 58.7% | 0 | 2 | 0 | 3 | 6 | 11 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Madison Keys | Patty Schnyder | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 14 | 2009 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #616 | 1,512 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 16 | 2011 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #273 | 1,516 | 0 | 0 | 1995 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #143 | 1,526 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | 2012 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #137 | 1,514 | 0 | 0 | 1996 | 7–9 | 43.8% | #64 | 1,587 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 2013 | 24–17 | 58.5% | #38 | 1,726 | 0 | 0 | 1997 | 21–24 | 46.7% | #26 | 1,710 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 2014 | 27–21 | 56.2% | #30 | 1,742 | 0 | 1 | 1998 | 51–19 | 72.9% | #11 | 1,910 | 0 | 5 |
| 20 | 2015 | 31–19 | 62.0% | #18 | 1,802 | 0 | 1 | 1999 | 29–23 | 55.8% | #21 | 1,793 | 0 | 6 |
| 21 | 2016 | 41–16 | 71.9% | #8 | 1,915 | 0 | 2 | 2000 | 31–25 | 55.4% | #25 | 1,751 | 0 | 6 |
| 22 | 2017 | 17–10 | 63.0% | #19 | 1,892 | 0 | 3 | 2001 | 24–24 | 50.0% | #37 | 1,734 | 0 | 7 |
| 23 | 2018 | 28–15 | 65.1% | #17 | 1,899 | 0 | 3 | 2002 | 34–24 | 58.6% | #15 | 1,848 | 0 | 8 |
| 24 | 2019 | 27–13 | 67.5% | #13 | 1,910 | 0 | 5 | 2003 | 28–23 | 54.9% | #23 | 1,818 | 0 | 8 |
| 25 | 2020 | 8–5 | 61.5% | #16 | 1,866 | 0 | 5 | 2004 | 31–22 | 58.5% | #14 | 1,793 | 0 | 8 |
| 26 | 2021 | 11–15 | 42.3% | #56 | 1,731 | 0 | 5 | 2005 | 58–25 | 69.9% | #7 | 1,928 | 0 | 10 |
| 27 | 2022 | 30–19 | 61.2% | #11 | 1,863 | 0 | 6 | 2006 | 47–25 | 65.3% | #9 | 1,898 | 0 | 10 |
| 28 | 2023 | 29–17 | 63.0% | #12 | 1,879 | 0 | 7 | 2007 | 45–26 | 63.4% | #16 | 1,879 | 0 | 10 |
| 29 | 2024 | 25–12 | 67.6% | #21 | 1,950 | 0 | 8 | 2008 | 33–21 | 61.1% | #14 | 1,827 | 0 | 11 |
| 30 | 2025 | 37–15 | 71.2% | #7 | 1,964 | 1 | 10 | 2009 | 21–22 | 48.8% | #42 | 1,755 | 0 | 11 |
| 31 | 2026 | 25–10 | 71.4% | #23 | 2,020 | 1 | 11 | 2010 | 26–19 | 57.8% | #44 | 1,799 | 0 | 11 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2011 | 3–9 | 25.0% | #55 | 1,667 | 0 | 11 |
| 37 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2016 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #324 | 1,631 | 0 | 11 |
| 38 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2017 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #148 | 1,627 | 0 | 11 |
| 39 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2018 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #278 | 1,597 | 0 | 11 |