H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 04:32 UTC
Madison Keys vs Sara Errani H2H: 0-1
Sara Errani holds a 1–0 lead over Madison Keys in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Sara Errani leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Sara Errani won the 2014 Roland Garros first round 7-5 3-6 6-1.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
USA
Age 31
Right-Handed
178 cm / 5'10"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
ITA
Age 39
Right-Handed
164 cm / 5'5"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 28, 2014* | Roland Garros | Grand Slam | R128 | Clay | Sara Errani | 7-5 3-6 6-1 | Madison Keys | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Madison Keys | #23 | #5 | 4,999 | 2,136 | 363 | 211 | 63.2% | 1 | 1 | 0 | 6 | 3 | 11 |
| Sara Errani | #461 | #5 | 5,835 | 2,024 | 384 | 299 | 56.2% | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 8 | 9 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Madison Keys | Sara Errani | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 14 | 2009 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #616 | 1,512 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 16 | 2011 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #273 | 1,516 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 2012 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #137 | 1,514 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 2013 | 24–17 | 58.5% | #38 | 1,726 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 2014 | 27–21 | 56.2% | #30 | 1,742 | 0 | 1 | 2006 | 3–3 | 50.0% | #174 | 1,529 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2015 | 31–19 | 62.0% | #18 | 1,802 | 0 | 1 | 2007 | 10–7 | 58.8% | #69 | 1,615 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2016 | 41–16 | 71.9% | #8 | 1,915 | 0 | 2 | 2008 | 29–21 | 58.0% | #42 | 1,747 | 0 | 2 |
| 22 | 2017 | 17–10 | 63.0% | #19 | 1,892 | 0 | 3 | 2009 | 25–27 | 48.1% | #47 | 1,656 | 0 | 2 |
| 23 | 2018 | 28–15 | 65.1% | #17 | 1,899 | 0 | 3 | 2010 | 36–29 | 55.4% | #43 | 1,720 | 0 | 2 |
| 24 | 2019 | 27–13 | 67.5% | #13 | 1,910 | 0 | 5 | 2011 | 30–26 | 53.6% | #45 | 1,671 | 0 | 2 |
| 25 | 2020 | 8–5 | 61.5% | #16 | 1,866 | 0 | 5 | 2012 | 53–19 | 73.6% | #6 | 1,901 | 0 | 6 |
| 26 | 2021 | 11–15 | 42.3% | #56 | 1,731 | 0 | 5 | 2013 | 46–22 | 67.6% | #7 | 1,894 | 0 | 7 |
| 27 | 2022 | 30–19 | 61.2% | #11 | 1,863 | 0 | 6 | 2014 | 35–23 | 60.3% | #14 | 1,773 | 0 | 7 |
| 28 | 2023 | 29–17 | 63.0% | #12 | 1,879 | 0 | 7 | 2015 | 46–26 | 63.9% | #20 | 1,752 | 0 | 8 |
| 29 | 2024 | 25–12 | 67.6% | #21 | 1,950 | 0 | 8 | 2016 | 18–21 | 46.2% | #49 | 1,625 | 0 | 9 |
| 30 | 2025 | 37–15 | 71.2% | #7 | 1,964 | 1 | 10 | 2017 | 17–15 | 53.1% | #144 | 1,650 | 0 | 9 |
| 31 | 2026 | 25–10 | 71.4% | #23 | 2,020 | 1 | 11 | 2018 | 6–8 | 42.9% | #112 | 1,765 | 0 | 9 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2019 | 3–7 | 30.0% | #198 | 1,567 | 0 | 9 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2020 | 4–3 | 57.1% | #131 | 1,604 | 0 | 9 |
| 34 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2021 | 8–11 | 42.1% | #121 | 1,579 | 0 | 9 |
| 35 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2022 | 2–6 | 25.0% | #109 | 1,597 | 0 | 9 |
| 36 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2023 | 3–10 | 23.1% | #105 | 1,550 | 0 | 9 |
| 37 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2024 | 10–13 | 43.5% | #105 | 1,699 | 0 | 9 |
| 38 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2025 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #461 | 1,594 | 0 | 9 |